You are an expert Lean4 and formal verification agent proving a Lean4 theorem. Your output **must** strictly adhere to the specified format.

### Input Information
You will receive the following components, relevant to the target theorem:
* <used_lib_defs>...</used_lib_defs>: Imported library definitions directly used by the theorem.
* <used_repo_defs>...</used_repo_defs>: Definitions from the local project (but outside the current file), directly or transitively used by the theorem.
* <lib_lemmas>...</lib_lemmas>: Imported library lemmas/theorems that may assist the proof.
* <repo_lemmas>...</repo_lemmas>: Lemmas/theorems defined in the local project outside this file.
* <local_ctx>...</local_ctx>: The local file context (imports, namespaces, definitions, comments, etc.) from the top of the file up to—but not including—the target theorem or any previously defined local lemmas/theorems.
* <target_theorem>...</target_theorem>: The target theorem statement, ending with `:=`.

**Notes**
1. Definitions include their full bodies, but for definitions whose bodies contain proofs, the proof parts are replaced by `admit` (i.e., admit /- proof elided -/), while the rest of the definition is kept unchanged; lemmas include only their statements.
2. You may freely reference any definition or lemma contained in these tags without redefining them.
3. The tags for used definitions and helpful lemmas (used_lib_defs, used_repo_defs, lib_lemmas, repo_lemmas) may be omitted if empty.

### Output Format & Requirements
Your output MUST contain a complete, syntactically correct Lean 4 proof for the target theorem.

**Strict Output Structure:**
<reasoning> 
...
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
-- each lemma is a full Lean 4 declaration with a complete proof
...
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
-- Lean 4 proof body of the target theorem
...
</lean4_proof>

**Requirements:**
1. <reasoning> and <lean4_invented_lemmas> are OPTIONAL. Include them only if they aid proof construction.
2. <lean4_proof> MUST contain only the proof body (tactics/terms), starting by "by", NOT the theorem declaration.
3. <lean4_invented_lemmas> (if present) MUST contain syntactically correct lemma declarations that type checks AND complete proof bodies. Defining a lemma using `axiom` is NOT allowed.
4. <reasoning> contains high-level proof planning.
5. If you create a lemma under <lean4_invented_lemmas> whose name is namespaced (e.g., X.Y.Z), you MUST always refer to it using its fully qualified name. Do NOT rely on shortened names. For example, write rw [X.Y.Z], not rw [Z] for invented lemmas.
6. All Lean 4 code MUST be syntactically correct. No `sorry`, `admit`, or non-Lean text. Comments allowed using `--` or `/- ... -/`.
7. Follow the tags and structure EXACTLY. No extra text before, between, or after the sections.
8. Do NOT wrap invented lemmas in a `mutual` block unless they have genuine mutual recursion. Declare each lemma independently.

### Examples are provided here (example input are under "User Prompt", and example assistant response are under "Agent Response"):
Example 1 ------------------- 
User Prompt:
<used_lib_defs>
structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
  /-- Construct a `BitVec w` from a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  ofFin ::

  /-- Interpret a bitvector as a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  toFin : Fin (hPow 2 w)
</used_lib_defs>

<repo_lemmas>
theorem List.getElem_append_left{α : Type u_1} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {i : Nat} (hn : i < l₁.length) :\n(l₁ ++ l₂)[i] = l₁[i]
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Computability.NFA
import Mathlib.Data.FinEnum
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Blase.AutoStructs.ForLean

open Set
open Mathlib
open SetRel

-- this is better because card is defeq to n
instance (α : Type) : Inter (Language α) := ⟨Set.inter⟩
instance (α : Type) : Union (Language α) := ⟨Set.union⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width.
-/
structure BitVecs (n : Nat) where
  w : Nat
  bvs : List.Vector (BitVec w) n

def BitVecs.cast (bvs : BitVecs n) (h : n = n') : BitVecs n' :=
  { w := bvs.w, bvs := h ▸ bvs.bvs }

abbrev BitVecs.empty : BitVecs n := ⟨0, List.Vector.replicate n .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.singleton {w : Nat} (bv : BitVec w) : BitVecs 1 := ⟨w, bv ::ᵥ .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.pair {w : Nat} (bv1 bv2 : BitVec w) : BitVecs 2 := ⟨w, bv1 ::ᵥ bv2 ::ᵥ .nil⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width, encoded as a list of
bit vectors of width `n`. The width of the encoded bit vectors is the length of
the list.
-/
abbrev BitVecs' (n : Nat) := List (BitVec n)

@[simps]
def dec (bvs' : BitVecs' n) : BitVecs n where
  w := bvs'.length
  bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k => BitVec.ofFn fun i => bvs'[i].getLsbD k

@[simp]
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma dec_snoc n (bvs' : BitVecs' n) (a : BitVec n) :
  dec (bvs' ++ [a]) =
    { w := bvs'.length + 1
      bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k =>
        BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k) } :=
</target_theorem>

Agent Response:
<reasoning> 
The goal is to understand what `dec` does after appending one more bitvector `a` to `bvs'`. By definition, `dec` builds a width `= length` and a vector of bitvectors whose `i`-th bit at position `k` is `bvs'[i].getLsbD k`. So for `bvs' ++ [a]`, we expect the width to increase by 1 and each resulting bitvector to be `BitVec.cons` of the new bit coming from `a`.

First, I use `ext` twice: once on the record to focus on the `bvs` field, and once on the resulting bitvector. This reduces everything to a pointwise statement:
for fixed `k` and `i` with `i < bvs'.length + 1`,
the bit `(bvs' ++ [a])[i].getLsbD k` should match the bit at index `i` of `BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k)`.

At this point I need a clean description of indexing into `BitVec.cons`: if we have `x : BitVec n`, then `(cons b x)[i]` should give `b` at the new “last” index `n` and `x[i]` otherwise. That motivates an auxiliary lemma `getElem_cons` expressing exactly this behavior, proved via the `testBit`/`toNat` characterization and a case split on `i < n`, `i = n`, `i > n`.

Using `getElem_cons`, the RHS becomes an `if` on whether `i = bvs'.length`. So I split into cases:
- If `i = bvs'.length`, then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i]` is the appended `a`, so both sides reduce to `a.getLsbD k`.
- If `i ≠ bvs'.length`, the bound `i < bvs'.length + 1` forces `i < bvs'.length`. Then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i] = bvs'[i]` by `List.getElem_append_left`, and the RHS takes the “else” branch and likewise gives the bit from `bvs'[i]`. In both subcases, `simp` (plus the definition of `dec`) finishes.

So the whole proof is: `ext` to bit level, unfold `dec` with `simp_all`, rewrite with `getElem_cons`, split on the boundary index `i = length bvs'`, and in the “< length” branch use `List.getElem_append_left` and bounds to line up both sides.
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
@[grind =]
theorem getElem_cons {b : Bool} {n} {x : BitVec n} {i : Nat} (h : i < n + 1) :
    (cons b x)[i] = if h : i = n then b else x[i] := by
  simp only [BitVec.getElem_eq_testBit_toNat, BitVec.toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
  rw [Nat.testBit_shiftLeft]
  rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i n with i_lt_n | i_eq_n | n_lt_i
  · have p1 : ¬(n ≤ i) := by omega
    have p2 : i ≠ n := by omega
    simp [p1, p2]
  · simp only [i_eq_n, ge_iff_le, Nat.le_refl, decide_true, Nat.sub_self, Nat.testBit_zero,
    Bool.true_and, BitVec.testBit_toNat, BitVec.getLsbD_of_ge, Bool.or_false]
    cases b <;> trivial
  · have p1 : i ≠ n := by omega
    have p2 : i - n ≠ 0 := by omega
    simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_toNat]
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
by
  ext k i hi <;> simp_all
  rw [getElem_cons]
  split
  next heq => simp_all
  next h =>
    have hlt : i < List.length bvs' := by simp at hi; omega
    rw [List.getElem_append_left hlt]
    simp
</lean4_proof>

### Your task:
<used_lib_defs>
Fin in Init.Prelude
Subspace in Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
Set in Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
Set.Ico in Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
Submodule in Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Defs
Submodule.span in Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Defs
Polynomial.C in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
Nat in Init.Prelude
Fintype in Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Defs
Fintype.card in Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
algebraMap in Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
Nat.succ in Init.Prelude
Polynomial.eval in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
IsLinearMap in Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Defs
RingHom in Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
RingHom.id in Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
Finset in Mathlib.Data.Finset.Defs
Finset.univ in Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Defs
Polynomial.rootMultiplicity in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
DecidableEq in Init.Prelude
CommRing in Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
Polynomial.algEquivOfCompEqX in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
Polynomial in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
Polynomial.X in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
</used_lib_defs>

<used_repo_defs>
noncomputable def W (i : Fin r) : L[X] :=
  ∏ u : U 𝔽q β i, (X - C u.val)

def U (i : Fin r) : Subspace 𝔽q L := Submodule.span 𝔽q (β '' (Set.Ico 0 i))

noncomputable def normalizedW (i : Fin r) : L[X] :=
  C (1 / (W 𝔽q β i).eval (β i)) * W 𝔽q β i

def getBit (k n : Nat) : Nat := (n >>> k) &&& 1

@[elab_as_elim] def Fin.succRecOnSameFinType {motive : Fin r → Sort _}
    (zero : motive (0 : Fin r))
    (succ : ∀ i : Fin r, i + 1 < r → motive i → motive (i + 1)) : ∀ (i : Fin r), motive i
  | ⟨0, _⟩ => by admit /- proof elided -/
  | ⟨Nat.succ i_val, h⟩ => by admit /- proof elided -/

@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquivAevalXSubC {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (t : R) : R[X] ≃ₐ[R] R[X] :=
</used_repo_defs>

<lib_lemmas>
Fintype.card_pos in Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
Polynomial.C_1 in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
Polynomial.C_comp in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
Polynomial.C_mul in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
Polynomial.C_pow in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
Polynomial.X_comp in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
Polynomial.comp_X in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
Polynomial.mul_comp in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
Polynomial.prod_comp in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
Polynomial.sub_comp in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
inv_eq_one_div in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
map_pow in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
mul_assoc in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
mul_comm in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
mul_inv_cancel₀ in Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
mul_one in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
mul_pow in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
mul_pow_sub_one in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
mul_sub in Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
one_div in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
one_mul in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
one_pow in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
Fin.eta in Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas
Fin.mk_eq_mk in Mathlib.Data.Fin.Basic
Nat.succ_eq_add_one in Init.Data.Nat.Basic
Polynomial.eval_X in Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
div_one in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
</lib_lemmas>

<repo_lemmas>
lemma Xⱼ_zero_eq_one (ℓ : ℕ) (h_ℓ : ℓ ≤ r) :
  Xⱼ 𝔽q β ℓ h_ℓ ⟨0, by exact Nat.two_pow_pos ℓ⟩ = 1

omit hF₂ in
theorem W_linear_comp_decomposition (i : Fin r) (h_i_add_1 : i + 1 < r) :
    ∀ p: L[X], (W 𝔽q β (i + 1)).comp p =
      ((W 𝔽q β i).comp p) ^ Fintype.card 𝔽q -
        C (eval (β i) (W 𝔽q β i)) ^ (Fintype.card 𝔽q - 1) * ((W 𝔽q β i).comp p)

theorem W_linearity (i : Fin r)
    : IsLinearMap 𝔽q (f := fun inner_p ↦ (W 𝔽q β i).comp inner_p)

omit hF₂ in
lemma inductive_linear_map_W (i : Fin r) (h_i_add_1 : i + 1 < r)
    (h_prev_linear_map : IsLinearMap 𝔽q (f := fun inner_p ↦ (W 𝔽q β i).comp inner_p))
    : IsLinearMap 𝔽q (f := fun inner_p ↦ (W 𝔽q β (i + 1)).comp inner_p)

omit h_Fq_char_prime hF₂ in
lemma inductive_rec_form_W_comp (i : Fin r) (h_i_add_1 : i + 1 < r)
    (h_prev_linear_map : IsLinearMap (R := 𝔽q) (M := L[X]) (M₂ := L[X])
      (f := fun inner_p ↦ (W 𝔽q β i).comp inner_p))
    : ∀ p: L[X], (W 𝔽q β (i + 1)).comp p =
      ((W 𝔽q β i).comp p) ^ Fintype.card 𝔽q -
        C (eval (β i) (W 𝔽q β i)) ^ (Fintype.card 𝔽q - 1) * ((W 𝔽q β i).comp p)

lemma Wᵢ_eval_βᵢ_neq_zero
    (i : Fin r): (W 𝔽q β i).eval (β i) ≠ 0

lemma βᵢ_not_in_Uᵢ (i : Fin r) :
    β i ∉ U 𝔽q β i

lemma W_prod_comp_decomposition
    (i : Fin r) (hi : i > 0) :
    (W 𝔽q β i) = ∏ c: 𝔽q, (W 𝔽q β (i-1)).comp (X - C (c • β (i-1)))

lemma W_splits (i : Fin r) : (W 𝔽q β i).Splits (RingHom.id L)

omit h_Fq_char_prime hF₂ in
lemma rootMultiplicity_prod_W_comp_X_sub_C
    (i : Fin r) (h_i_add_1 : i + 1 < r) (a : L) :
    rootMultiplicity a ((univ : Finset 𝔽q).prod (fun c => (W 𝔽q β i).comp (X - C (c • β i)))) =
    if a ∈ (U 𝔽q β (i+1) : Set L) then 1 else 0

omit [DecidableEq L] h_Fq_char_prime hF₂ hβ_lin_indep in
lemma Prod_W_comp_X_sub_C_ne_zero (i : Fin r) :
    (univ : Finset 𝔽q).prod (fun c => (W 𝔽q β i).comp (X - C (c • β i))) ≠ 0

omit [DecidableEq L] [Fintype 𝔽q] hβ_lin_indep in
lemma W_ne_zero (i : Fin r) : (W 𝔽q β i) ≠ 0

lemma roots_comp_X_sub_C (p : L[X]) (a : L) :
    (p.comp (X - C a)).roots = p.roots.map (fun r => r + a)

lemma rootMultiplicity_comp_X_sub_C (p : L[X]) (a x : L) :
    rootMultiplicity x (p.comp (X - C a)) = rootMultiplicity (x - a) p

omit [Fintype L] [DecidableEq L] in
lemma comp_X_sub_C_eq_zero_iff (p : L[X]) (a : L) :
  p.comp (X - C a) = 0 ↔ p = 0

lemma rootMultiplicity_W (i : Fin r) (a : L) :
    rootMultiplicity a (W 𝔽q β i) = if a ∈ (U 𝔽q β i : Set L) then 1 else 0

lemma roots_W (i : Fin r) : -- converts root Multiset into (univ: Uᵢ.val.map)
  (W 𝔽q β i).roots = (univ : Finset (U 𝔽q β i)).val.map (fun u => u.val)

omit [Fintype L] [DecidableEq L] [Fintype 𝔽q] h_Fq_char_prime hβ_lin_indep in
theorem root_U_lift_up (i : Fin r) (h_i_add_1 : i + 1 < r) (a : L) (x : 𝔽q) :
  a - x • β i ∈ (U 𝔽q β i) → a ∈ (U 𝔽q β (i+1))

omit [Fintype L] [DecidableEq L] [Fintype 𝔽q] h_Fq_char_prime in
theorem root_U_lift_down
  (i : Fin r) (h_i_add_1 : i + 1 < r) (a : L) :
  a ∈ (U 𝔽q β (i+1)) → ∃! x: 𝔽q, a - x • β i ∈ (U 𝔽q β i)

lemma W_monic (i : Fin r) : (W 𝔽q β i).Monic

lemma comp_sub_C_of_linear_eval (p : L[X])
  (h_lin : IsLinearMap 𝔽q (f := fun inner_p ↦ p.comp inner_p)) (a : L) :
    p.comp (X - C a) = p - C (eval a p)

theorem prod_poly_sub_C_eq_poly_pow_card_sub_poly_in_L
  (p : L[X]) :
  (∏ c ∈ (Finset.univ : Finset Fq), (p - Polynomial.C (algebraMap Fq L c))) =
    p^(Fintype.card Fq) - p

theorem prod_X_sub_C_eq_X_pow_card_sub_X_in_L :
  (∏ c ∈ (Finset.univ : Finset Fq), (Polynomial.X - Polynomial.C (algebraMap Fq L c))) =
    Polynomial.X^(Fintype.card Fq) - Polynomial.X

theorem prod_X_sub_C_eq_X_pow_card_sub_X :
  (∏ c ∈ (Finset.univ : Finset Fq), (Polynomial.X - Polynomial.C c)) =
    Polynomial.X^(Fintype.card Fq) - Polynomial.X

omit [DecidableEq L] [Fintype 𝔽q] hβ_lin_indep in
lemma W₀_eq_X : W 𝔽q β 0 = X

lemma Fin.val_add_one' (a : Fin r) (h_a_add_1 : a + 1 < r) : (a + 1).val = a.val + 1
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import ArkLib.Data.FieldTheory.AdditiveNTT.NovelPolynomialBasis

import Mathlib.Tactic

import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs

import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Defs

open Polynomial AdditiveNTT Module

namespace AdditiveNTT

variable {r : ℕ} [NeZero r]

variable {L : Type u} [Field L] [Fintype L] [DecidableEq L]

variable (𝔽q : Type u) [Field 𝔽q] [Fintype 𝔽q] [DecidableEq 𝔽q]
  [h_Fq_char_prime : Fact (Nat.Prime (ringChar 𝔽q))] [hF₂ : Fact (Fintype.card 𝔽q = 2)]

variable [Algebra 𝔽q L]

variable (β : Fin r → L) [hβ_lin_indep : Fact (LinearIndependent 𝔽q β)]
  [h_β₀_eq_1 : Fact (β 0 = 1)]

variable {ℓ R_rate : ℕ} (h_ℓ_add_R_rate : ℓ + R_rate < r)-- ℓ ∈ {1, ..., r-1}

section IntermediateStructures

noncomputable def qMap (i : Fin r) : L[X] :=
  let constMultiplier := ((W 𝔽q β i).eval (β i))^(Fintype.card 𝔽q)
    / ((W 𝔽q β (i + 1)).eval (β (i + 1)))
  C constMultiplier * ∏ c: 𝔽q, (X - C (algebraMap 𝔽q L c))

noncomputable def qCompositionChain (i : Fin r) : L[X] :=
  match i with
  | ⟨0, _⟩ => X
  | ⟨k + 1, h_k_add_1⟩ => (qMap 𝔽q β ⟨k, by admit /- proof elided -/
  ⟩).comp (qCompositionChain ⟨k, by admit /- proof elided -/
  ⟩)
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma normalizedW_eq_qMap_composition (ℓ R_rate : ℕ) (i : Fin r) :
    normalizedW 𝔽q β i = qCompositionChain 𝔽q β (ℓ:=ℓ) (R_rate:=R_rate) i :=
</target_theorem>

