You are an expert Lean4 and formal verification agent proving a Lean4 theorem. Your output **must** strictly adhere to the specified format.

### Input Information
You will receive the following components, relevant to the target theorem:
* <used_lib_defs>...</used_lib_defs>: Imported library definitions directly used by the theorem.
* <used_repo_defs>...</used_repo_defs>: Definitions from the local project (but outside the current file), directly or transitively used by the theorem.
* <lib_lemmas>...</lib_lemmas>: Imported library lemmas/theorems that may assist the proof.
* <repo_lemmas>...</repo_lemmas>: Lemmas/theorems defined in the local project outside this file.
* <local_ctx>...</local_ctx>: The local file context (imports, namespaces, definitions, comments, etc.) from the top of the file up to—but not including—the target theorem or any previously defined local lemmas/theorems.
* <target_theorem>...</target_theorem>: The target theorem statement, ending with `:=`.

**Notes**
1. Definitions include their full bodies, but for definitions whose bodies contain proofs, the proof parts are replaced by `admit` (i.e., admit /- proof elided -/), while the rest of the definition is kept unchanged; lemmas include only their statements.
2. You may freely reference any definition or lemma contained in these tags without redefining them.
3. The tags for used definitions and helpful lemmas (used_lib_defs, used_repo_defs, lib_lemmas, repo_lemmas) may be omitted if empty.

### Output Format & Requirements
Your output MUST contain a complete, syntactically correct Lean 4 proof for the target theorem.

**Strict Output Structure:**
<reasoning> 
...
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
-- each lemma is a full Lean 4 declaration with a complete proof
...
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
-- Lean 4 proof body of the target theorem
...
</lean4_proof>

**Requirements:**
1. <reasoning> and <lean4_invented_lemmas> are OPTIONAL. Include them only if they aid proof construction.
2. <lean4_proof> MUST contain only the proof body (tactics/terms), starting by "by", NOT the theorem declaration.
3. <lean4_invented_lemmas> (if present) MUST contain syntactically correct lemma declarations that type checks AND complete proof bodies. Defining a lemma using `axiom` is NOT allowed.
4. <reasoning> contains high-level proof planning.
5. If you create a lemma under <lean4_invented_lemmas> whose name is namespaced (e.g., X.Y.Z), you MUST always refer to it using its fully qualified name. Do NOT rely on shortened names. For example, write rw [X.Y.Z], not rw [Z] for invented lemmas.
6. All Lean 4 code MUST be syntactically correct. No `sorry`, `admit`, or non-Lean text. Comments allowed using `--` or `/- ... -/`.
7. Follow the tags and structure EXACTLY. No extra text before, between, or after the sections.
8. Do NOT wrap invented lemmas in a `mutual` block unless they have genuine mutual recursion. Declare each lemma independently.

### Examples are provided here (example input are under "User Prompt", and example assistant response are under "Agent Response"):
Example 1 ------------------- 
User Prompt:
<used_lib_defs>
structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
  /-- Construct a `BitVec w` from a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  ofFin ::

  /-- Interpret a bitvector as a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  toFin : Fin (hPow 2 w)
</used_lib_defs>

<repo_lemmas>
theorem List.getElem_append_left{α : Type u_1} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {i : Nat} (hn : i < l₁.length) :\n(l₁ ++ l₂)[i] = l₁[i]
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Computability.NFA
import Mathlib.Data.FinEnum
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Blase.AutoStructs.ForLean

open Set
open Mathlib
open SetRel

-- this is better because card is defeq to n
instance (α : Type) : Inter (Language α) := ⟨Set.inter⟩
instance (α : Type) : Union (Language α) := ⟨Set.union⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width.
-/
structure BitVecs (n : Nat) where
  w : Nat
  bvs : List.Vector (BitVec w) n

def BitVecs.cast (bvs : BitVecs n) (h : n = n') : BitVecs n' :=
  { w := bvs.w, bvs := h ▸ bvs.bvs }

abbrev BitVecs.empty : BitVecs n := ⟨0, List.Vector.replicate n .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.singleton {w : Nat} (bv : BitVec w) : BitVecs 1 := ⟨w, bv ::ᵥ .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.pair {w : Nat} (bv1 bv2 : BitVec w) : BitVecs 2 := ⟨w, bv1 ::ᵥ bv2 ::ᵥ .nil⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width, encoded as a list of
bit vectors of width `n`. The width of the encoded bit vectors is the length of
the list.
-/
abbrev BitVecs' (n : Nat) := List (BitVec n)

@[simps]
def dec (bvs' : BitVecs' n) : BitVecs n where
  w := bvs'.length
  bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k => BitVec.ofFn fun i => bvs'[i].getLsbD k

@[simp]
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma dec_snoc n (bvs' : BitVecs' n) (a : BitVec n) :
  dec (bvs' ++ [a]) =
    { w := bvs'.length + 1
      bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k =>
        BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k) } :=
</target_theorem>

Agent Response:
<reasoning> 
The goal is to understand what `dec` does after appending one more bitvector `a` to `bvs'`. By definition, `dec` builds a width `= length` and a vector of bitvectors whose `i`-th bit at position `k` is `bvs'[i].getLsbD k`. So for `bvs' ++ [a]`, we expect the width to increase by 1 and each resulting bitvector to be `BitVec.cons` of the new bit coming from `a`.

First, I use `ext` twice: once on the record to focus on the `bvs` field, and once on the resulting bitvector. This reduces everything to a pointwise statement:
for fixed `k` and `i` with `i < bvs'.length + 1`,
the bit `(bvs' ++ [a])[i].getLsbD k` should match the bit at index `i` of `BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k)`.

At this point I need a clean description of indexing into `BitVec.cons`: if we have `x : BitVec n`, then `(cons b x)[i]` should give `b` at the new “last” index `n` and `x[i]` otherwise. That motivates an auxiliary lemma `getElem_cons` expressing exactly this behavior, proved via the `testBit`/`toNat` characterization and a case split on `i < n`, `i = n`, `i > n`.

Using `getElem_cons`, the RHS becomes an `if` on whether `i = bvs'.length`. So I split into cases:
- If `i = bvs'.length`, then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i]` is the appended `a`, so both sides reduce to `a.getLsbD k`.
- If `i ≠ bvs'.length`, the bound `i < bvs'.length + 1` forces `i < bvs'.length`. Then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i] = bvs'[i]` by `List.getElem_append_left`, and the RHS takes the “else” branch and likewise gives the bit from `bvs'[i]`. In both subcases, `simp` (plus the definition of `dec`) finishes.

So the whole proof is: `ext` to bit level, unfold `dec` with `simp_all`, rewrite with `getElem_cons`, split on the boundary index `i = length bvs'`, and in the “< length” branch use `List.getElem_append_left` and bounds to line up both sides.
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
@[grind =]
theorem getElem_cons {b : Bool} {n} {x : BitVec n} {i : Nat} (h : i < n + 1) :
    (cons b x)[i] = if h : i = n then b else x[i] := by
  simp only [BitVec.getElem_eq_testBit_toNat, BitVec.toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
  rw [Nat.testBit_shiftLeft]
  rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i n with i_lt_n | i_eq_n | n_lt_i
  · have p1 : ¬(n ≤ i) := by omega
    have p2 : i ≠ n := by omega
    simp [p1, p2]
  · simp only [i_eq_n, ge_iff_le, Nat.le_refl, decide_true, Nat.sub_self, Nat.testBit_zero,
    Bool.true_and, BitVec.testBit_toNat, BitVec.getLsbD_of_ge, Bool.or_false]
    cases b <;> trivial
  · have p1 : i ≠ n := by omega
    have p2 : i - n ≠ 0 := by omega
    simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_toNat]
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
by
  ext k i hi <;> simp_all
  rw [getElem_cons]
  split
  next heq => simp_all
  next h =>
    have hlt : i < List.length bvs' := by simp at hi; omega
    rw [List.getElem_append_left hlt]
    simp
</lean4_proof>

### Your task:
<used_lib_defs>
inline in Init.Core
OptionT in Init.Control.Option
Nonempty in Init.Prelude
AddLECancellable in Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
Classical.arbitrary in Mathlib.Logic.Nonempty
ENNReal in Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
PMF in Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Basic
Option.elimM in Init.Data.Option.Basic
Vector in Init.Data.Vector.Basic
Vector.insertIdx in Init.Data.Vector.Basic
AddCommMonoid in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
ContinuousAdd in Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
Function.update in Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
Option in Init.Prelude
Summable in Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
T2Space in Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
TopologicalSpace in Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Basic
</used_lib_defs>

<used_repo_defs>
notation "[⊥" "|" oa "]" => probFailure oa

notation "[=" x "|" oa "]" => probOutput oa x

class HasEvalDist (m : Type u → Type v) [Monad m] where
  evalDist {α : Type u} (mx : m α) : SPMF α
  evalDist_pure {α : Type u} (x : α) : evalDist (pure x : m α) = pure x
  evalDist_bind {α β : Type u} (mx : m α) (my : α → m β) :
    evalDist (mx >>= my) = evalDist mx >>= fun x => evalDist (my x)

def OracleComp {ι : Type u} (spec : OracleSpec.{u,v} ι) :
    Type w → Type (max u (v + 1) w) :=
  OptionT (FreeMonad (OracleQuery.{u,v} spec))

inductive OracleQuery {ι : Type u} (spec : OracleSpec.{u,v} ι) : Type v → Type (max u v)
  | query (i : ι) (t : spec.domain i) : OracleQuery spec (spec.range i)

@[inline, reducible]
protected def domain (spec : OracleSpec ι) (i : ι) : Type v := (spec i).1

def OracleSpec (ι : Type u) : Type (max u (v + 1)) :=
  (i : ι) → Type v × Type v

@[inline, reducible]
protected def range (spec : OracleSpec ι) (i : ι) : Type w := (spec i).2

inductive FreeMonad (f : Type u → Type v) (α : Type w) : Type (max (u + 1) v w)
  | protected pure (x : α) : FreeMonad f α
  | roll {β : Type u} (x : f β) (r : β → FreeMonad f α) : FreeMonad f α

def cases {α} {motive : {n : ℕ} → Vector α n → Sort*} (v_empty : motive #v[])
  (v_insert : {n : ℕ} → (hd : α) → (tl : Vector α n) → motive (tl.insertIdx 0 hd)) {m : ℕ} :
    (v : Vector α m) → motive v := match hm : m with
  | 0 => fun v => match v with | ⟨⟨[]⟩, rfl⟩ => v_empty
  | n + 1 => fun v => match hv : v with
    | ⟨⟨hd :: tl⟩, hSize⟩ => by admit /- proof elided -/
</used_repo_defs>

<lib_lemmas>
PMF.coe_le_one in Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Basic
ENNReal.summable in Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
symm in Mathlib.Order.Defs.Unbundled
add_comm in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
PMF.apply_ne_top in Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Basic
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq in Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
AddLECancellable.add_tsub_assoc_of_le in Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Unbundled.Basic
ENNReal.addLECancellable_iff_ne in Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
ENNReal.div_self in Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Inv
ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div in Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Inv
ENNReal.mul_ne_top in Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
ENNReal.sub_mul in Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
ENNReal.tsum_mul_right in Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
le_of_le_of_eq in Init.Core
le_refl in Mathlib.Order.Defs.PartialOrder
one_mul in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
</lib_lemmas>

<repo_lemmas>
lemma tsum_option {α β : Type*} [AddCommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
    [ContinuousAdd α] [T2Space α]
    (f : Option β → α) (hf : Summable (Function.update f none 0)) :
    ∑' x : Option β, f x = f none + ∑' x : β, f (some x)
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import VCVio.OracleComp.Traversal

import VCVio.OracleComp.SimSemantics.SimulateQ

import Mathlib.Probability.Distributions.Uniform

import ToMathlib.General

open OracleSpec Option ENNReal BigOperators

namespace OracleComp

variable {ι : Type u} {spec : OracleSpec ι} {ι' : Type v} {spec' : OracleSpec ι'}
  {α β γ : Type w} [spec.FiniteRange] [spec'.FiniteRange]

section evalDist

end evalDist

noncomputable def probOutput (oa : OracleComp spec α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
  (evalDist oa).run (some x)

notation "[=" x "|" oa "]" => probOutput oa x

noncomputable def probFailure (oa : OracleComp spec α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
  (evalDist oa).run none

notation "[⊥" "|" oa "]" => probFailure oa

notation "[" p "|" oa "]" => probEvent oa p

section bounds

variable {oa : OracleComp spec α} {x : α} {p : α → Prop}

end bounds

section support

variable (oa : OracleComp spec α) (x : α) (p q : α → Prop)

variable {oa x p q}

end support

section sums

variable (oa : OracleComp spec α) (p : α → Prop)

end sums

section pure

variable (x : α)

end pure

section bind

variable (oa : OracleComp spec α) (ob : α → OracleComp spec β)
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma probFailure_bind_of_const [Nonempty α] (r : ℝ≥0∞) (h : ∀ x, [⊥ | ob x] = r) :
    [⊥ | oa >>= ob] = [⊥ | oa] + r - [⊥ | oa] * r :=
</target_theorem>

