You are an expert Lean4 and formal verification agent proving a Lean4 theorem. Your output **must** strictly adhere to the specified format.

### Input Information
You will receive the following components, relevant to the target theorem:
* <used_lib_defs>...</used_lib_defs>: Imported library definitions directly used by the theorem.
* <used_repo_defs>...</used_repo_defs>: Definitions from the local project (but outside the current file), directly or transitively used by the theorem.
* <lib_lemmas>...</lib_lemmas>: Imported library lemmas/theorems that may assist the proof.
* <repo_lemmas>...</repo_lemmas>: Lemmas/theorems defined in the local project outside this file.
* <local_ctx>...</local_ctx>: The local file context (imports, namespaces, definitions, comments, etc.) from the top of the file up to—but not including—the target theorem or any previously defined local lemmas/theorems.
* <target_theorem>...</target_theorem>: The target theorem statement, ending with `:=`.

**Notes**
1. Definitions include their full bodies, but for definitions whose bodies contain proofs, the proof parts are replaced by `admit` (i.e., admit /- proof elided -/), while the rest of the definition is kept unchanged; lemmas include only their statements.
2. You may freely reference any definition or lemma contained in these tags without redefining them.
3. The tags for used definitions and helpful lemmas (used_lib_defs, used_repo_defs, lib_lemmas, repo_lemmas) may be omitted if empty.

### Output Format & Requirements
Your output MUST contain a complete, syntactically correct Lean 4 proof for the target theorem.

**Strict Output Structure:**
<reasoning> 
...
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
-- each lemma is a full Lean 4 declaration with a complete proof
...
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
-- Lean 4 proof body of the target theorem
...
</lean4_proof>

**Requirements:**
1. <reasoning> and <lean4_invented_lemmas> are OPTIONAL. Include them only if they aid proof construction.
2. <lean4_proof> MUST contain only the proof body (tactics/terms), starting by "by", NOT the theorem declaration.
3. <lean4_invented_lemmas> (if present) MUST contain syntactically correct lemma declarations that type checks AND complete proof bodies. Defining a lemma using `axiom` is NOT allowed.
4. <reasoning> contains high-level proof planning.
5. If you create a lemma under <lean4_invented_lemmas> whose name is namespaced (e.g., X.Y.Z), you MUST always refer to it using its fully qualified name. Do NOT rely on shortened names. For example, write rw [X.Y.Z], not rw [Z] for invented lemmas.
6. All Lean 4 code MUST be syntactically correct. No `sorry`, `admit`, or non-Lean text. Comments allowed using `--` or `/- ... -/`.
7. Follow the tags and structure EXACTLY. No extra text before, between, or after the sections.
8. Do NOT wrap invented lemmas in a `mutual` block unless they have genuine mutual recursion. Declare each lemma independently.

### Examples are provided here (example input are under "User Prompt", and example assistant response are under "Agent Response"):
Example 1 ------------------- 
User Prompt:
<used_lib_defs>
structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
  /-- Construct a `BitVec w` from a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  ofFin ::

  /-- Interpret a bitvector as a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  toFin : Fin (hPow 2 w)
</used_lib_defs>

<repo_lemmas>
theorem List.getElem_append_left{α : Type u_1} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {i : Nat} (hn : i < l₁.length) :\n(l₁ ++ l₂)[i] = l₁[i]
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Computability.NFA
import Mathlib.Data.FinEnum
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Blase.AutoStructs.ForLean

open Set
open Mathlib
open SetRel

-- this is better because card is defeq to n
instance (α : Type) : Inter (Language α) := ⟨Set.inter⟩
instance (α : Type) : Union (Language α) := ⟨Set.union⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width.
-/
structure BitVecs (n : Nat) where
  w : Nat
  bvs : List.Vector (BitVec w) n

def BitVecs.cast (bvs : BitVecs n) (h : n = n') : BitVecs n' :=
  { w := bvs.w, bvs := h ▸ bvs.bvs }

abbrev BitVecs.empty : BitVecs n := ⟨0, List.Vector.replicate n .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.singleton {w : Nat} (bv : BitVec w) : BitVecs 1 := ⟨w, bv ::ᵥ .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.pair {w : Nat} (bv1 bv2 : BitVec w) : BitVecs 2 := ⟨w, bv1 ::ᵥ bv2 ::ᵥ .nil⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width, encoded as a list of
bit vectors of width `n`. The width of the encoded bit vectors is the length of
the list.
-/
abbrev BitVecs' (n : Nat) := List (BitVec n)

@[simps]
def dec (bvs' : BitVecs' n) : BitVecs n where
  w := bvs'.length
  bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k => BitVec.ofFn fun i => bvs'[i].getLsbD k

@[simp]
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma dec_snoc n (bvs' : BitVecs' n) (a : BitVec n) :
  dec (bvs' ++ [a]) =
    { w := bvs'.length + 1
      bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k =>
        BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k) } :=
</target_theorem>

Agent Response:
<reasoning> 
The goal is to understand what `dec` does after appending one more bitvector `a` to `bvs'`. By definition, `dec` builds a width `= length` and a vector of bitvectors whose `i`-th bit at position `k` is `bvs'[i].getLsbD k`. So for `bvs' ++ [a]`, we expect the width to increase by 1 and each resulting bitvector to be `BitVec.cons` of the new bit coming from `a`.

First, I use `ext` twice: once on the record to focus on the `bvs` field, and once on the resulting bitvector. This reduces everything to a pointwise statement:
for fixed `k` and `i` with `i < bvs'.length + 1`,
the bit `(bvs' ++ [a])[i].getLsbD k` should match the bit at index `i` of `BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k)`.

At this point I need a clean description of indexing into `BitVec.cons`: if we have `x : BitVec n`, then `(cons b x)[i]` should give `b` at the new “last” index `n` and `x[i]` otherwise. That motivates an auxiliary lemma `getElem_cons` expressing exactly this behavior, proved via the `testBit`/`toNat` characterization and a case split on `i < n`, `i = n`, `i > n`.

Using `getElem_cons`, the RHS becomes an `if` on whether `i = bvs'.length`. So I split into cases:
- If `i = bvs'.length`, then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i]` is the appended `a`, so both sides reduce to `a.getLsbD k`.
- If `i ≠ bvs'.length`, the bound `i < bvs'.length + 1` forces `i < bvs'.length`. Then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i] = bvs'[i]` by `List.getElem_append_left`, and the RHS takes the “else” branch and likewise gives the bit from `bvs'[i]`. In both subcases, `simp` (plus the definition of `dec`) finishes.

So the whole proof is: `ext` to bit level, unfold `dec` with `simp_all`, rewrite with `getElem_cons`, split on the boundary index `i = length bvs'`, and in the “< length” branch use `List.getElem_append_left` and bounds to line up both sides.
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
@[grind =]
theorem getElem_cons {b : Bool} {n} {x : BitVec n} {i : Nat} (h : i < n + 1) :
    (cons b x)[i] = if h : i = n then b else x[i] := by
  simp only [BitVec.getElem_eq_testBit_toNat, BitVec.toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
  rw [Nat.testBit_shiftLeft]
  rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i n with i_lt_n | i_eq_n | n_lt_i
  · have p1 : ¬(n ≤ i) := by omega
    have p2 : i ≠ n := by omega
    simp [p1, p2]
  · simp only [i_eq_n, ge_iff_le, Nat.le_refl, decide_true, Nat.sub_self, Nat.testBit_zero,
    Bool.true_and, BitVec.testBit_toNat, BitVec.getLsbD_of_ge, Bool.or_false]
    cases b <;> trivial
  · have p1 : i ≠ n := by omega
    have p2 : i - n ≠ 0 := by omega
    simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_toNat]
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
by
  ext k i hi <;> simp_all
  rw [getElem_cons]
  split
  next heq => simp_all
  next h =>
    have hlt : i < List.length bvs' := by simp at hi; omega
    rw [List.getElem_append_left hlt]
    simp
</lean4_proof>

### Your task:
<used_lib_defs>
Option in Init.Prelude
Option.merge in Init.Data.Option.Basic
id in Init.Prelude
Equivalence in Init.Core
Nat in Init.Prelude
m in QqTest.matching
List in Init.Prelude
Bool in Init.Prelude
</used_lib_defs>

<used_repo_defs>
macro "∃" xs:explicitBinders ", " b:term : term => do
  return ⟨← expandExplicitBinders ``BIBase.exists xs b⟩

scoped notation:40 x " ≡{" n "}≡ " y:41 => OFE.Dist n x y

syntax:max "<pers> " term:40 : term

macro:25 P:term:29 " ⊢ " Q:term:25 : term => ``(BIBase.Entails iprop($P) iprop($Q))

delab_rule BIBase.Entails
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``($(← unpackIprop P) ⊢ $(← unpackIprop Q))

macro:25 P:term:29 " ⊣⊢ " Q:term:29 : term => ``(BiEntails iprop($P) iprop($Q))

delab_rule BIBase.Entails
  | `($_ iprop(emp) $P) => do ``(⊢ $(← unpackIprop P))

delab_rule BIBase.BiEntails
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``($(← unpackIprop P) ⊣⊢ $(← unpackIprop Q))

syntax "⌜" term "⌝" : term

syntax:max "▷ " term:40 : term

syntax:max "<absorb> " term:40 : term

macro:max "iprop(" P:term " : " t:term ")" : term => `((iprop($P) : $t))

syntax:max "iprop(" term ")" : term

syntax:max "<affine> " term:40 : term

syntax:max "□ " term:40 : term

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(term($t))) => pure t
  | `(iprop($t))       => pure t

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(($P)))                  => ``((iprop($P)))
  | `(iprop(if $c then $t else $e)) => ``(if $c then iprop($t) else iprop($e))
  | `(iprop(($P : $t)))             => ``((iprop($P) : $t))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(emp))       => ``(BIBase.emp)
  | `(iprop(⌜$φ⌝))      => ``(BIBase.pure $φ)
  | `(iprop($P ∧ $Q))   => ``(BIBase.and iprop($P) iprop($Q))
  | `(iprop($P ∨ $Q))   => ``(BIBase.or iprop($P) iprop($Q))
  | `(iprop($P → $Q))   => ``(BIBase.imp iprop($P) iprop($Q))
  | `(iprop(∃ $xs, $Ψ)) => do expandExplicitBinders ``BIBase.exists xs (← ``(iprop($Ψ)))
  | `(iprop($P ∗ $Q))   => ``(BIBase.sep iprop($P) iprop($Q))
  | `(iprop($P -∗ $Q))  => ``(BIBase.wand iprop($P) iprop($Q))
  | `(iprop(<pers> $P)) => ``(BIBase.persistently iprop($P))
  | `(iprop(▷ $P))      => ``(BIBase.later iprop($P))

delab_rule BIBase.emp
  | `($_) => ``(iprop($(mkIdent `emp)))
delab_rule BIBase.pure
  | `($_ $φ) => ``(iprop(⌜$φ⌝))
delab_rule BIBase.and
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``(iprop($(← unpackIprop P) ∧ $(← unpackIprop Q)))
delab_rule BIBase.or
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``(iprop($(← unpackIprop P) ∨ $(← unpackIprop Q)))
delab_rule BIBase.imp
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``(iprop($(← unpackIprop P) → $(← unpackIprop Q)))
delab_rule BIBase.forall
  | `($_ fun $x:ident => iprop(∀ $y:ident $[$z:ident]*, $Ψ)) => do
    ``(iprop(∀ $x:ident $y:ident $[$z:ident]*, $Ψ))
  | `($_ fun $x:ident => $Ψ) => do ``(iprop(∀ $x:ident, $(← unpackIprop Ψ)))
delab_rule BIBase.exists
  | `($_ fun $x:ident => iprop(∃ $y:ident $[$z:ident]*, $Ψ)) => do
    ``(iprop(∃ $x:ident $y:ident $[$z:ident]*, $Ψ))
  | `($_ fun $x:ident => $Ψ) => do ``(iprop(∃ $x:ident, $(← unpackIprop Ψ)))
delab_rule BIBase.sep
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``(iprop($(← unpackIprop P) ∗ $(← unpackIprop Q)))
delab_rule BIBase.wand
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``(iprop($(← unpackIprop P) -∗ $(← unpackIprop Q)))
delab_rule BIBase.persistently
  | `($_ $P) => do ``(iprop(<pers> $(← unpackIprop P)))

delab_rule BIBase.pure
  | `($_ True) => ``(iprop($(mkIdent `True)))
  | `($_ False) => ``(iprop($(mkIdent `False)))
delab_rule BIBase.imp
  | `($_ $P iprop(False)) => do ``(iprop(¬$(← unpackIprop P)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(∀ _%$tk, $Ψ)) => ``(BIBase.forall (fun _%$tk => iprop($Ψ)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(∀ $x:ident, $Ψ)) => ``(BIBase.forall (fun $x => iprop($Ψ)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(∀ (_%$tk : $t), $Ψ)) => ``(BIBase.forall (fun (_%$tk : $t) => iprop($Ψ)))
  | `(iprop(∀ (_%$tk $xs* : $t), $Ψ)) =>
    ``(BIBase.forall (fun (_%$tk : $t) => iprop(∀ ($xs* : $t), $Ψ)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(∀ ($x:ident : $t), $Ψ)) => ``(BIBase.forall (fun ($x : $t) => iprop($Ψ)))
  | `(iprop(∀ ($x:ident $xs* : $t), $Ψ)) =>
    ``(BIBase.forall (fun ($x : $t) => iprop(∀ ($xs* : $t), $Ψ)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(∀ {_%$tk : $t}, $Ψ)) =>
    ``(BIBase.forall (fun {_%$tk : $t}  => iprop($Ψ)))
  | `(iprop(∀ {_%$tk $xs* : $t}, $Ψ)) =>
    ``(BIBase.forall (fun {_%$tk : $t}  => iprop(∀ {$xs* : $t}, $Ψ)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(∀ {$x:ident : $t}, $Ψ)) =>
    ``(BIBase.forall (fun ($x : $t) => iprop($Ψ)))
  | `(iprop(∀ {$x:ident $xs* : $t}, $Ψ)) =>
    ``(BIBase.forall (fun ($x : $t) => iprop(∀ {$xs* : $t}, $Ψ)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(∀ $x $y $xs*, $Ψ)) => ``(iprop(∀ $x, ∀ $y $xs*, $Ψ))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(True))  => ``(BIBase.pure True)
  | `(iprop(False)) => ``(BIBase.pure False)
  | `(iprop(¬$P))   => ``(iprop($P → False))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop($P ↔ $Q))   => ``(iff iprop($P) iprop($Q))
  | `(iprop($P ∗-∗ $Q)) => ``(wandIff iprop($P) iprop($Q))

delab_rule iff
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``(iprop($(← unpackIprop P) ↔ $(← unpackIprop Q)))
delab_rule wandIff
  | `($_ $P $Q) => do ``(iprop($(← unpackIprop P) ∗-∗ $(← unpackIprop Q)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(<affine> $P)) => ``(affinely iprop($P))
  | `(iprop(<absorb> $P)) => ``(absorbingly iprop($P))

delab_rule affinely
  | `($_ $P) => do ``(iprop(<affine> $(← unpackIprop P)))
delab_rule absorbingly
  | `($_ $P) => do ``(iprop(<absorb> $(← unpackIprop P)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(□ $P)) => ``(intuitionistically iprop($P))

delab_rule intuitionistically
  | `($_ $P) => do ``(iprop(□ $(← unpackIprop P)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(<pers>?$p $P))   => ``(persistentlyIf $p iprop($P))
  | `(iprop(<affine>?$p $P)) => ``(affinelyIf $p iprop($P))
  | `(iprop(<absorb>?$p $P)) => ``(absorbinglyIf $p iprop($P))
  | `(iprop(□?$p $P))        => ``(intuitionisticallyIf $p iprop($P))

delab_rule persistentlyIf
  | `($_ $p $P) => do ``(iprop(<pers>?$p $(← unpackIprop P)))
delab_rule affinelyIf
  | `($_ $p $P) => do ``(iprop(<affine>?$p $(← unpackIprop P)))
delab_rule absorbinglyIf
  | `($_ $p $P) => do ``(iprop(<absorb>?$p $(← unpackIprop P)))
delab_rule intuitionisticallyIf
  | `($_ $p $P) => do ``(iprop(□?$p $(← unpackIprop P)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(▷^[$n] $P))   => ``(laterN $n iprop($P))

delab_rule laterN
  | `($_ $n $P) => do ``(iprop(▷^[$n] $(← unpackIprop P)))

macro_rules
  | `(iprop(◇ $P)) => ``(except0 iprop($P))

delab_rule except0
  | `($_ $P) => do ``(iprop(◇ $(← unpackIprop P)))

class LawfulBigOp (f : PROP → PROP → PROP) (unit : outParam PROP)
    (eq : outParam (PROP → PROP → Prop)) where
  refl : eq a a
  symm : eq a b → eq b a
  trans : eq a b → eq b c → eq a c
  comm : eq (f a b) (f b a)
  assoc : eq (f (f a b) c) (f a (f b c))
  left_id : eq (f unit a) a
  congr_l : eq a a' → eq (f a b) (f a' b)

class BIBase (PROP : Type u) where
  Entails : PROP → PROP → Prop
  emp : PROP
  pure : Prop → PROP
  and : PROP → PROP → PROP
  or : PROP → PROP → PROP
  imp : PROP → PROP → PROP
  sForall : (PROP → Prop) → PROP
  sExists : (PROP → Prop) → PROP
  sep : PROP → PROP → PROP
  wand : PROP → PROP → PROP
  persistently : PROP → PROP
  later : PROP → PROP

class BI (PROP : Type _) extends COFE PROP, BI.BIBase PROP where
  Equiv P Q := P ⊣⊢ Q

  entails_preorder : Preorder Entails
  equiv_iff {P Q : PROP} : (P ≡ Q) ↔ P ⊣⊢ Q := by admit /- proof elided -/

def liftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (A : α → Prop) (B : β → Prop) : Prop :=
  (∀ a, A a → ∃ b, B b ∧ R a b) ∧ (∀ b, B b → ∃ a, A a ∧ R a b)

class Preorder (R : Relation α) extends Reflexive R, Transitive R

class Reflexive (R : Relation α) where
  refl {x : α} : R x x

abbrev Relation (α : Type _) := α → α → Prop

class Transitive (R : Relation α) where
  trans {x y z : α} : R x y → R y z → R x z

class NonExpansive₂ [OFE α] [OFE β] [OFE γ] (f : α → β → γ) where
  ne : ∀ ⦃n x₁ x₂⦄, x₁ ≡{n}≡ x₂ → ∀ ⦃y₁ y₂⦄, y₁ ≡{n}≡ y₂ → f x₁ y₁ ≡{n}≡ f x₂ y₂

instance OFE.ContractiveHom.fixpoint_ne [COFE α] [Inhabited α] :
    NonExpansive (ContractiveHom.fixpoint (α := α)) where
  ne n f1 f2 H := by admit /- proof elided -/

@[ext] structure ContractiveHom (α β : Type _) [OFE α] [OFE β] extends Hom α β where
  [contractive : Contractive f]
  ne := ne_of_contractive f

instance OFE.Option.some.ne [OFE α] : OFE.NonExpansive (some : α → Option α) := ⟨fun _ _ _ => id⟩

instance Option.merge_ne [OFE α] {op : α → α → α} [NonExpansive₂ op] :
    NonExpansive₂ (Option.merge op) where
  ne n x1 x2 Hx y1 y2 Hy := by admit /- proof elided -/

class NonExpansive [OFE α] [OFE β] (f : α → β) where
  ne : ∀ ⦃n x₁ x₂⦄, x₁ ≡{n}≡ x₂ → f x₁ ≡{n}≡ f x₂

instance COFE.OFunctor.constOF_RFunctor [CMRA B] : RFunctor (constOF B) where
  map f g := by admit /- proof elided -/

class IsCOFE (α : Type _) [OFE α] where
  compl : Chain α → α
  conv_compl {c : Chain α} : compl c ≡{n}≡ c n

structure Chain (α : Type _) [OFE α] where
  chain : Nat → α
  cauchy : n ≤ i → chain i ≡{n}≡ chain n

class BIAffine (PROP : Type _) [BI PROP] where
  affine (P : PROP) : Affine P

class Affine [BI PROP] (P : PROP) where
  affine : P ⊢ emp

class Absorbing [BI PROP] (P : PROP) where
  absorbing : <absorb> P ⊢ P

class inductive TCOr (T U : Sort _)
  | l [t : T] : TCOr T U
  | r [u : U] : TCOr T U

def intuitionistically [BIBase PROP] (P : PROP) : PROP := iprop(<affine> <pers> P)

def bigAnd [BIBase PROP] (Ps : List PROP) : PROP := bigOp and iprop(True) Ps

def bigOp (f : PROP → PROP → PROP) (unit : PROP) : List PROP → PROP
  | []      => unit
  | [P]     => P
  | P :: Ps => f P (bigOp f unit Ps)

def absorbingly [BIBase PROP] (P : PROP) : PROP := iprop(True ∗ P)

structure BiEntails [BIBase PROP] (P Q : PROP) where
  mp : P ⊢ Q
  mpr : Q ⊢ P

def persistentlyIf [BIBase PROP] (p : Bool) (P : PROP) : PROP := iprop(if p then <pers> P else P)

def intuitionisticallyIf [BIBase PROP] (p : Bool) (P : PROP) : PROP := iprop(if p then □ P else P)

def bigSep [BIBase PROP] (Ps : List PROP) : PROP := bigOp sep iprop(emp) Ps

def affinely    [BIBase PROP] (P : PROP) : PROP := iprop(emp ∧ P)

def bigOr [BIBase PROP] (Ps : List PROP) : PROP := bigOp or iprop(False) Ps

def absorbinglyIf [BIBase PROP] (p : Bool) (P : PROP) : PROP := iprop(if p then <absorb> P else P)

def affinelyIf [BIBase PROP] (p : Bool) (P : PROP) : PROP := iprop(if p then <affine> P else P)

def wandIff [BIBase PROP] (P Q : PROP) : PROP := iprop((P -∗ Q) ∧ (Q -∗ P))

scoped infix:40 " ≡ " => OFE.Equiv

scoped notation:40 x " ≡{" n "}≡ " y:41 => OFE.Dist n x y

infixr:25 " -c> " => ContractiveHom

notation:40 "[∧] " Ps:max => bigAnd Ps

notation:40 "[∨] " Ps:max => bigOr Ps

notation:40 "[∗] " Ps:max => bigSep Ps
</used_repo_defs>

<repo_lemmas>
theorem Dist.trans [OFE α] {n} {x : α} : x ≡{n}≡ y → y ≡{n}≡ z → x ≡{n}≡ z

theorem BIBase.BiEntails.trans [BI PROP] {P Q R : PROP} (h1 : P ⊣⊢ Q) (h2 : Q ⊣⊢ R) : P ⊣⊢ R

theorem BIBase.Entails.trans [BI PROP] {P Q R : PROP} (h1 : P ⊢ Q) (h2 : Q ⊢ R) : P ⊢ R

theorem Equiv.trans [OFE α] {x : α} : x ≡ y → y ≡ z → x ≡ z

theorem equiv_eqv [ofe : OFE α] : Equivalence ofe.Equiv

@[symm] theorem Dist.symm [OFE α] {n} {x : α} : x ≡{n}≡ y → y ≡{n}≡ x

@[simp, refl] theorem Dist.rfl [OFE α] {n} {x : α} : x ≡{n}≡ x

theorem DistLater.trans [OFE α] {n} {x : α} (h1 : DistLater n x y) (h2 : DistLater n y z) :
    DistLater n x z
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Iris.BI.Classes

import Iris.BI.Extensions

import Iris.BI.BI

import Iris.Std.Classes

import Iris.Std.Rewrite

import Iris.Std.TC

namespace Iris.BI

open Iris.Std BI
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
theorem wand_iff_exists_persistently [BI PROP] [BIAffine PROP] {P Q : PROP} :
    (P -∗ Q) ⊣⊢ ∃ R, R ∗ <pers> (P ∗ R → Q) :=
</target_theorem>

