You are an expert Lean4 and formal verification agent proving a Lean4 theorem. Your output **must** strictly adhere to the specified format.

### Input Information
You will receive the following components, relevant to the target theorem:
* <used_lib_defs>...</used_lib_defs>: Imported library definitions directly used by the theorem.
* <used_repo_defs>...</used_repo_defs>: Definitions from the local project (but outside the current file), directly or transitively used by the theorem.
* <lib_lemmas>...</lib_lemmas>: Imported library lemmas/theorems that may assist the proof.
* <repo_lemmas>...</repo_lemmas>: Lemmas/theorems defined in the local project outside this file.
* <local_ctx>...</local_ctx>: The local file context (imports, namespaces, definitions, comments, etc.) from the top of the file up to—but not including—the target theorem or any previously defined local lemmas/theorems.
* <target_theorem>...</target_theorem>: The target theorem statement, ending with `:=`.

**Notes**
1. Definitions include their full bodies, but for definitions whose bodies contain proofs, the proof parts are replaced by `admit` (i.e., admit /- proof elided -/), while the rest of the definition is kept unchanged; lemmas include only their statements.
2. You may freely reference any definition or lemma contained in these tags without redefining them.
3. The tags for used definitions and helpful lemmas (used_lib_defs, used_repo_defs, lib_lemmas, repo_lemmas) may be omitted if empty.

### Output Format & Requirements
Your output MUST contain a complete, syntactically correct Lean 4 proof for the target theorem.

**Strict Output Structure:**
<reasoning> 
...
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
-- each lemma is a full Lean 4 declaration with a complete proof
...
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
-- Lean 4 proof body of the target theorem
...
</lean4_proof>

**Requirements:**
1. <reasoning> and <lean4_invented_lemmas> are OPTIONAL. Include them only if they aid proof construction.
2. <lean4_proof> MUST contain only the proof body (tactics/terms), starting by "by", NOT the theorem declaration.
3. <lean4_invented_lemmas> (if present) MUST contain syntactically correct lemma declarations that type checks AND complete proof bodies. Defining a lemma using `axiom` is NOT allowed.
4. <reasoning> contains high-level proof planning.
5. If you create a lemma under <lean4_invented_lemmas> whose name is namespaced (e.g., X.Y.Z), you MUST always refer to it using its fully qualified name. Do NOT rely on shortened names. For example, write rw [X.Y.Z], not rw [Z] for invented lemmas.
6. All Lean 4 code MUST be syntactically correct. No `sorry`, `admit`, or non-Lean text. Comments allowed using `--` or `/- ... -/`.
7. Follow the tags and structure EXACTLY. No extra text before, between, or after the sections.
8. Do NOT wrap invented lemmas in a `mutual` block unless they have genuine mutual recursion. Declare each lemma independently.

### Examples are provided here (example input are under "User Prompt", and example assistant response are under "Agent Response"):
Example 1 ------------------- 
User Prompt:
<used_lib_defs>
structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
  /-- Construct a `BitVec w` from a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  ofFin ::

  /-- Interpret a bitvector as a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  toFin : Fin (hPow 2 w)
</used_lib_defs>

<repo_lemmas>
theorem List.getElem_append_left{α : Type u_1} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {i : Nat} (hn : i < l₁.length) :\n(l₁ ++ l₂)[i] = l₁[i]
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Computability.NFA
import Mathlib.Data.FinEnum
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Blase.AutoStructs.ForLean

open Set
open Mathlib
open SetRel

-- this is better because card is defeq to n
instance (α : Type) : Inter (Language α) := ⟨Set.inter⟩
instance (α : Type) : Union (Language α) := ⟨Set.union⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width.
-/
structure BitVecs (n : Nat) where
  w : Nat
  bvs : List.Vector (BitVec w) n

def BitVecs.cast (bvs : BitVecs n) (h : n = n') : BitVecs n' :=
  { w := bvs.w, bvs := h ▸ bvs.bvs }

abbrev BitVecs.empty : BitVecs n := ⟨0, List.Vector.replicate n .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.singleton {w : Nat} (bv : BitVec w) : BitVecs 1 := ⟨w, bv ::ᵥ .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.pair {w : Nat} (bv1 bv2 : BitVec w) : BitVecs 2 := ⟨w, bv1 ::ᵥ bv2 ::ᵥ .nil⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width, encoded as a list of
bit vectors of width `n`. The width of the encoded bit vectors is the length of
the list.
-/
abbrev BitVecs' (n : Nat) := List (BitVec n)

@[simps]
def dec (bvs' : BitVecs' n) : BitVecs n where
  w := bvs'.length
  bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k => BitVec.ofFn fun i => bvs'[i].getLsbD k

@[simp]
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma dec_snoc n (bvs' : BitVecs' n) (a : BitVec n) :
  dec (bvs' ++ [a]) =
    { w := bvs'.length + 1
      bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k =>
        BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k) } :=
</target_theorem>

Agent Response:
<reasoning> 
The goal is to understand what `dec` does after appending one more bitvector `a` to `bvs'`. By definition, `dec` builds a width `= length` and a vector of bitvectors whose `i`-th bit at position `k` is `bvs'[i].getLsbD k`. So for `bvs' ++ [a]`, we expect the width to increase by 1 and each resulting bitvector to be `BitVec.cons` of the new bit coming from `a`.

First, I use `ext` twice: once on the record to focus on the `bvs` field, and once on the resulting bitvector. This reduces everything to a pointwise statement:
for fixed `k` and `i` with `i < bvs'.length + 1`,
the bit `(bvs' ++ [a])[i].getLsbD k` should match the bit at index `i` of `BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k)`.

At this point I need a clean description of indexing into `BitVec.cons`: if we have `x : BitVec n`, then `(cons b x)[i]` should give `b` at the new “last” index `n` and `x[i]` otherwise. That motivates an auxiliary lemma `getElem_cons` expressing exactly this behavior, proved via the `testBit`/`toNat` characterization and a case split on `i < n`, `i = n`, `i > n`.

Using `getElem_cons`, the RHS becomes an `if` on whether `i = bvs'.length`. So I split into cases:
- If `i = bvs'.length`, then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i]` is the appended `a`, so both sides reduce to `a.getLsbD k`.
- If `i ≠ bvs'.length`, the bound `i < bvs'.length + 1` forces `i < bvs'.length`. Then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i] = bvs'[i]` by `List.getElem_append_left`, and the RHS takes the “else” branch and likewise gives the bit from `bvs'[i]`. In both subcases, `simp` (plus the definition of `dec`) finishes.

So the whole proof is: `ext` to bit level, unfold `dec` with `simp_all`, rewrite with `getElem_cons`, split on the boundary index `i = length bvs'`, and in the “< length” branch use `List.getElem_append_left` and bounds to line up both sides.
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
@[grind =]
theorem getElem_cons {b : Bool} {n} {x : BitVec n} {i : Nat} (h : i < n + 1) :
    (cons b x)[i] = if h : i = n then b else x[i] := by
  simp only [BitVec.getElem_eq_testBit_toNat, BitVec.toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
  rw [Nat.testBit_shiftLeft]
  rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i n with i_lt_n | i_eq_n | n_lt_i
  · have p1 : ¬(n ≤ i) := by omega
    have p2 : i ≠ n := by omega
    simp [p1, p2]
  · simp only [i_eq_n, ge_iff_le, Nat.le_refl, decide_true, Nat.sub_self, Nat.testBit_zero,
    Bool.true_and, BitVec.testBit_toNat, BitVec.getLsbD_of_ge, Bool.or_false]
    cases b <;> trivial
  · have p1 : i ≠ n := by omega
    have p2 : i - n ≠ 0 := by omega
    simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_toNat]
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
by
  ext k i hi <;> simp_all
  rw [getElem_cons]
  split
  next heq => simp_all
  next h =>
    have hlt : i < List.length bvs' := by simp at hi; omega
    rw [List.getElem_append_left hlt]
    simp
</lean4_proof>

### Your task:
<used_lib_defs>
String in Init.Prelude
Nat in Init.Prelude
Bool in Init.Prelude
Int in Init.Data.Int.Basic
Finmap in Mathlib.Data.Finmap
BEq in Init.Prelude
List in Init.Prelude
Repr in Init.Data.Repr
Vector in Init.Data.Vector.Basic
bool in Init.Control.Basic
ite in Init.Prelude
Computation in Mathlib.Data.Seq.Computation
Option in Init.Prelude
Max in Init.Prelude
Max.max in Init.Prelude
Finmap.singleton in Mathlib.Data.Finmap
move in Ssreflect.Basic
sby in Ssreflect.Done
t in Ssreflect.IntroPats
srw in Ssreflect.Rewrite
elim in Ssreflect.Elim
</used_lib_defs>

<used_repo_defs>
syntax "if " lang "then " lang "end " : lang

syntax " := " : bop

syntax "let" ident " := " lang " in" ppDedent(ppLine lang) : lang

syntax "fun" ident+ " => " lang : lang

macro "∃ʰ" xs:Lean.explicitBinders ", " b:term : term => Lean.expandExplicitBinders ``hexists xs b

syntax "⟨" term "⟩" : lang

syntax "⟨" term ":" term "⟩" : lang

macro_rules
  | `([lang| ()])                       => `(trm_val (val_unit))
  | `([lang| $n:num])                   => `(trm_val (val_int $n))
  | `([lang| $t1 $t2])                  => `(trm_app [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| if $t1 then $t2 else $t3]) => `(trm_if [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2] [lang| $t3])
  | `([lang| if $t1 then $t2 end])      => `(trm_if [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2] (trm_val val_unit))
  | `([lang| let $x := $t1:lang in $t2:lang])     =>
    `(trm_let $(%x) [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| ref $x := $t1:lang in $t2:lang])     =>
    `(trm_ref $(%x) [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| alloc $t1:lang as $x in $t2:lang])   =>
    `(trm_alloc $(%x) [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 ; $t2])                => `(trm_seq [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| fun_ $xs* => $t])             => do
    let xs <- xs.mapM fun x => `(term| $(%x))
    `(trm_funs [ $xs,* ] [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| fun $xs* => $t])             => do
    let xs <- xs.mapM fun x => `(term| $(%x))
    `(val_funs [ $xs,* ] [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| fix_ $f $xs* => $t])    => do
      let xs <- xs.mapM fun x => `(term| $(%x))
      `(trm_fixs $(%f) [ $xs,* ] [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| fix $f $xs* => $t])    => do
      let xs <- xs.mapM fun x => `(term| $(%x))
      `(val_fixs $(%f) [ $xs,* ] [lang| $t])
  
  | `([lang| free $t])                  => `(trm_val (val_prim val_free) [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| not $t])                   => `(trm_val (val_prim val_not) [lang| $t])
  
  | `([lang| !$t])                      => `(trm_val val_get [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| $t1 := $t2])               => `(trm_val val_set [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 + $t2])                => `(trm_val val_add [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 * $t2])                => `(trm_val val_mul [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 - $t2])                => `(trm_val val_sub [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 / $t2])                => `(trm_val val_div [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 < $t2])                => `(trm_val val_lt [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 > $t2])                => `(trm_val val_gt [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 <= $t2])               => `(trm_val val_le [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 >= $t2])               => `(trm_val val_ge [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| -$t])                      => `(trm_val val_opp [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| $t1 = $t2])                => `(trm_val val_eq [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 != $t2])               => `(trm_val val_neq [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 mod $t2])              => `(trm_val val_mod [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 ++ $t2])               => `(trm_val val_ptr_add [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| ($t)]) => `([lang| $t])
  | `([lang| ⟨$t : $tp⟩]) => `(trm_val (($t : $tp)))
  | `([lang| for $x in [$n1 : $n2] { $t } ]) =>
    `(trm_for $(%x) [lang| $n1] [lang| $n2] [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| while $c:lang { $t:lang } ]) =>
     `(trm_while [lang| $c] [lang| $t] )

macro_rules
  | `([lang| len $p])                => `(trm_val val_array_length [lang| $p])
  | `([lang| $arr[$i] ])              => `(trm_val val_array_get [lang| $arr] [lang| $i])
  
  | `([lang| $arr[$i] := $v])        => `(trm_app val_array_set [lang| $arr] [lang| $i] [lang| $v])
  | `([lang| mkarr $n:lang $v:lang]) => `(trm_val val_array_make [lang| $n] [lang| $v])

macro_rules | `($x ∗ $y)   => `(binop% HStar.hStar $x $y)

  inductive trm : Type where
    | trm_val   : val -> trm
    | trm_var   : var -> trm
    | trm_fun   : var -> trm -> trm
    | trm_fix   : var -> var -> trm -> trm
    | trm_app   : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_seq   : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_let   : var -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_if    : trm -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_for   : var -> trm -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_while : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_ref   : var → trm → trm → trm
    | trm_alloc : var → trm → trm → trm

  inductive val : Type where
    | val_unit   : val
    | val_bool   : Bool → val
    | val_int    : Int → val
    | val_real   : ℝ → val
    | val_loc    : loc → val
    | val_prim   : prim → val
    | val_fun    : var -> trm -> val
    | val_fix    : var -> var -> trm -> val
    | val_uninit : val
    | val_error : val

inductive prim where
  
  | val_get : prim
  | val_set : prim
  
  | val_neg : prim
  | val_opp : prim
  | val_eq : prim
  | val_add : prim
  | val_neq : prim
  | val_sub : prim
  | val_mul : prim
  | val_div : prim
  | val_mod : prim
  
  | val_le : prim
  | val_lt : prim
  | val_ge : prim
  | val_gt : prim
  | val_ptr_add : prim

abbrev var := String

abbrev loc := Nat

def hProp := heap -> Prop

abbrev heap := Heap.heap val

abbrev Heap.heap (val : Type) := Finmap (λ _ : loc ↦ val)

inductive eval : state → trm → (val → state → Prop) -> Prop where
  | eval_val : forall s v Q,
      Q v s ->
      eval s (trm_val v) Q
  | eval_fun : forall s x t1 Q,
      Q (val_fun x t1) s ->
      eval s (trm_fun x t1) Q
  | eval_fix : forall s f x t1 Q,
      Q (val_fix f x t1) s ->
      eval s (trm_fix f x t1) Q
  | eval_app_arg1 : forall s1 t1 t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t1 ->
      eval s1 t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 t2) Q) ->
      eval s1 (trm_app t1 t2) Q
  | eval_app_arg2 : forall s1 (v1 : val) t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t2 ->
      eval s1 t2 Q1 ->
      (forall v2 s2, Q1 v2 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 v2) Q) ->
      eval s1 (trm_app v1 t2) Q
  | eval_app_fun : forall s1 v1 (v2 :val) x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fun x t1 ->
      eval s1 (subst x v2 t1) Q ->
      eval s1 (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | eval_app_fix : forall s (v1 v2 : val) f x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fix f x t1 ->
      eval s (subst x v2 (subst f v1 t1)) Q ->
      eval s (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | eval_seq : forall Q1 s t1 t2 Q,
      eval s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 t2 Q) ->
      eval s (trm_seq t1 t2) Q
  | eval_let : forall Q1 s x t1 t2 Q,
      eval s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (subst x v1 t2) Q) ->
      eval s (trm_let x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_if : forall s (b : Bool) t1 t2 Q,
      eval s (if b then t1 else t2) Q ->
      eval s (trm_if (val_bool b) t1 t2) Q
  | eval_unop : forall op s v1 P Q,
      evalunop op v1 P ->
      purepostin s P Q ->
      eval s (trm_app op v1) Q
  | eval_binop : forall op s (v1 v2 : val) P Q,
      evalbinop op v1 v2 P ->
      purepostin s P Q ->
      eval s (trm_app (trm_app op v1) v2) Q
  | eval_ref : forall s x t1 t2 (Q Q₁ : val → state → Prop),
    eval s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v1 s1, Q₁ v1 s1 → ∀ p ∉ s1,
     eval (s1.insert p v1) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s.erase p)) →
    eval s (trm_ref x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_get : forall s p Q,
      p ∈ s ->
      Q (read_state p s) s ->
      eval s (trm_app val_get (val_loc p)) Q
  | eval_set : forall s p v Q,
      v = trm_val v' ->
      p ∈ s ->
      Q val_unit (Finmap.insert p v' s) ->
      eval s (trm_app (trm_app val_set (val_loc p)) v) Q
  | eval_alloc_arg : forall s Q₁ Q,
    ¬ trm_is_val t1 →
    eval s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v' s', Q₁ v' s' → eval s' (trm_alloc x v' t2) Q) →
    eval s (trm_alloc x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_alloc : forall (sa : state) (n : ℤ) Q,
    n ≥ 0 →
    (∀ (p : loc) (sb : state),
      sb = conseq (make_list n.natAbs val_uninit) p →
      p ≠ null →
      Finmap.Disjoint sa sb →
      eval (sb ∪ sa) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s \ sb)) →
    eval sa (trm_alloc x n t2) Q
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  | eval_for (n₁ n₂ : Int) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    eval s (if (n₁ < n₂) then
               (trm_seq (subst x n₁ t₁) (trm_for x (val_int (n₁ + 1)) n₂ t₁))
            else val_unit) Q ->
    eval s (trm_for x n₁ n₂ t₁) Q
  | eval_while (t₁ t₂ : trm) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    eval s t₁ Q₁ ->
    (∀ s v, Q₁ v s -> eval s (trm_if v (trm_seq t₂ (trm_while t₁ t₂)) val_unit) Q) ->
    eval s (trm_while t₁ t₂) Q

class HStar (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   
  hStar : α → β → γ

def hsingle (p : loc) (v : val) : hProp :=
  fun h => (h = Finmap.singleton p v)

inductive evalExact : state → trm → (val → state → Prop) -> Prop where
  | val : forall s v,
      evalExact s (trm_val v) (fun v' s' ↦ v' = v ∧ s' = s)
  | fun : forall s x t1,
      evalExact s (trm_fun x t1) (fun v' s' ↦ v' = val_fun x t1 ∧ s' = s)
  | fix : forall s f x t1,
      evalExact s (trm_fix f x t1) (fun v' s' ↦ v' = val_fix f x t1 ∧ s' = s)
  | app_arg1 : forall s1 t1 t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t1 ->
      evalExact s1 t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> evalExact s2 (trm_app v1 t2) Q) ->
      evalExact s1 (trm_app t1 t2) Q
  | app_arg2 : forall s1 (v1 : val) t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t2 ->
      evalExact s1 t2 Q1 ->
      (forall v2 s2, Q1 v2 s2 -> evalExact s2 (trm_app v1 v2) Q) ->
      evalExact s1 (trm_app v1 t2) Q
  | app_fun : forall s1 v1 (v2 :val) x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fun x t1 ->
      evalExact s1 (subst x v2 t1) Q ->
      evalExact s1 (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | app_fix : forall s (v1 v2 : val) f x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fix f x t1 ->
      evalExact s (subst x v2 (subst f v1 t1)) Q ->
      evalExact s (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | seq : forall Q1 s t1 t2 Q,
      evalExact s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> evalExact s2 t2 Q) ->
      evalExact s (trm_seq t1 t2) Q
  | let : forall Q1 s x t1 t2 Q,
      evalExact s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> evalExact s2 (subst x v1 t2) Q) ->
      evalExact s (trm_let x t1 t2) Q
  | if : forall s (b : Bool) t1 t2 Q,
      evalExact s (if b then t1 else t2) Q ->
      evalExact s (trm_if (val_bool b) t1 t2) Q
  | unop : forall op s v1 P,
      evalunop op v1 P ->
      evalExact s (trm_app op v1) (purepost s P)
  | binop : forall op s (v1 v2 : val) P,
      evalbinop op v1 v2 P ->
      evalExact s (trm_app (trm_app op v1) v2) (purepost s P)
  | ref : forall s x t1 t2 Q Q₁,
    evalExact s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v1 s1, Q₁ v1 s1 → ∀ p ∉ s1,
     evalExact (s1.insert p v1) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s.erase p)) →
      evalExact s (trm_ref x t1 t2) Q
  | get : forall s p,
      p ∈ s ->
      evalExact s (trm_app val_get (val_loc p))
        (fun v' s' ↦ v' = read_state p s ∧ s' = s)
  | set : forall s p v,
      v = trm_val v' ->
      p ∈ s ->
      evalExact s (trm_app (trm_app val_set (val_loc p)) v)
        (fun v'' s' ↦ v'' = val_unit ∧ s' = s.insert p v')
  | alloc_arg : forall s Q₁ Q,
    ¬ trm_is_val t1 →
    evalExact s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v' s', Q₁ v' s' → evalExact s' (trm_alloc x v' t2) Q) →
    evalExact s (trm_alloc x t1 t2) Q
  | alloc : forall (sa : state) (n : ℤ) Q,
    n ≥ 0 →
    (∀ (p : loc) (sb : state),
      sb = conseq (make_list n.natAbs val_uninit) p →
      p ≠ null →
      Finmap.Disjoint sa sb →
      evalExact (sb ∪ sa) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s \ sb)) →
    evalExact sa (trm_alloc x n t2) Q
  
  
  
  
  
  
  | for (n₁ n₂ : Int) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    evalExact s (if (n₁ < n₂) then
               (trm_seq (subst x n₁ t₁) (trm_for x (val_int (n₁ + 1)) n₂ t₁))
            else val_unit) Q ->
    evalExact s (trm_for x n₁ n₂ t₁) Q
  | while (t₁ t₂ : trm) (Q Q₁ : val -> state -> Prop) :
    evalExact s t₁ Q₁ ->
    (∀ s v, Q₁ v s -> evalExact s (trm_if v (trm_seq t₂ (trm_while t₁ t₂)) val_unit) Q) ->
    evalExact s (trm_while t₁ t₂) Q

def subst (y : var) (v' : val) (t : trm) : trm :=
  
  let if_y_eq x t1 t2 := if x = y then t1 else t2
  match t with
  | trm_val v          => trm_val v
  | trm_var x          => if_y_eq x (trm_val v') t
  | trm_fun x t1       => trm_fun x (if_y_eq x t1 (subst y v' t1))
  | trm_fix f x t1     => trm_fix f x (if_y_eq f t1 (if_y_eq x t1 (subst y v' t1)))
  | trm_app t1 t2      => trm_app (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2)
  | trm_seq t1 t2      => trm_seq (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2)
  | trm_let x t1 t2    => trm_let x (subst y v' t1) (if_y_eq x t2 (subst y v' t2))
  | trm_if t0 t1 t2    => trm_if (subst y v' t0) (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2)
  | trm_for x t1 t2 t3 => trm_for x (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2) (if_y_eq x t3 (subst y v' t3))
  | trm_while t1 t2    => trm_while (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2)
  | trm_ref x t1 t2    => trm_ref x (subst y v' t1) (if_y_eq x t2 (subst y v' t2))
  | trm_alloc x t1 t2  => trm_alloc x (subst y v' t1) (if_y_eq x t2 (subst y v' t2))

def qimpl {A} (Q1 Q2 : A → hProp) : Prop :=
  forall (v:A), Q1 v ==> Q2 v

abbrev himpl (H1 H2 : hProp) : Prop :=
  forall h, H1 h -> H2 h

def purepostin (s : state) (P : val → Prop) (Q : val → state → Prop) : Prop :=
  
  forall v, P v → Q v s

abbrev state := Finmap (λ _ : loc ↦ val)

def hexists {A} (J : A → hProp) : hProp :=
  fun h => exists x, J x h

infixr:51 " ==> " => himpl

infixr:51 " ===> " => qimpl

infixr:60 " ~~> " => hsingle

infixr:55 " ∗ " => HStar.hStar
</used_repo_defs>

<repo_lemmas>
lemma disjoint_single (h : state) :
  p ∉ h →
  h.Disjoint (Finmap.singleton p v)

lemma hsingl_inv p v h :
  (p ~~> v) h →
  h = Finmap.singleton p v

lemma union_singleton_eq_erase (h h' : state) :
  h.Disjoint (Finmap.singleton p v) →
  h' = h ∪ Finmap.singleton p v →
  h = h'.erase p

lemma hexists_inv A (J : A → hProp) h :
  (hexists J) h → exists x, J x h

lemma hsingle_intro p v :
  (p ~~> v) (Finmap.singleton p v)

lemma insert_eq_union_single (h : state) :
  p ∉ h →
  h.insert p v = h ∪ (Finmap.singleton p v)
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Data.Finmap

import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic

import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Nodup

import SPLean.Common.State

import SPLean.Common.Util

import SPLean.Theories.HProp

import SPLean.Theories.XSimp

open trm val prim

abbrev triple (t : trm) (H : hProp) (Q : val → hProp) : Prop :=
  forall s, H s → eval s t Q

notation "funloc" p "↦" H =>
  fun (r : val) ↦ hexists (fun p ↦ ⌜r = val_loc p⌝ ∗ H)

section evalProp

end evalProp
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma triple_ref (v : val) :
  (forall (p : loc), triple (subst x p t2) (H ∗ (p ~~> v)) (Q ∗ ∃ʰ v, p ~~> v)) →
  triple (trm_ref x (trm_val v) t2) H Q :=
</target_theorem>

