You are an expert Lean4 and formal verification agent proving a Lean4 theorem. Your output **must** strictly adhere to the specified format.

### Input Information
You will receive the following components, relevant to the target theorem:
* <used_lib_defs>...</used_lib_defs>: Imported library definitions directly used by the theorem.
* <used_repo_defs>...</used_repo_defs>: Definitions from the local project (but outside the current file), directly or transitively used by the theorem.
* <lib_lemmas>...</lib_lemmas>: Imported library lemmas/theorems that may assist the proof.
* <repo_lemmas>...</repo_lemmas>: Lemmas/theorems defined in the local project outside this file.
* <local_ctx>...</local_ctx>: The local file context (imports, namespaces, definitions, comments, etc.) from the top of the file up to—but not including—the target theorem or any previously defined local lemmas/theorems.
* <target_theorem>...</target_theorem>: The target theorem statement, ending with `:=`.

**Notes**
1. Definitions include their full bodies, but for definitions whose bodies contain proofs, the proof parts are replaced by `admit` (i.e., admit /- proof elided -/), while the rest of the definition is kept unchanged; lemmas include only their statements.
2. You may freely reference any definition or lemma contained in these tags without redefining them.
3. The tags for used definitions and helpful lemmas (used_lib_defs, used_repo_defs, lib_lemmas, repo_lemmas) may be omitted if empty.

### Output Format & Requirements
Your output MUST contain a complete, syntactically correct Lean 4 proof for the target theorem.

**Strict Output Structure:**
<reasoning> 
...
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
-- each lemma is a full Lean 4 declaration with a complete proof
...
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
-- Lean 4 proof body of the target theorem
...
</lean4_proof>

**Requirements:**
1. <reasoning> and <lean4_invented_lemmas> are OPTIONAL. Include them only if they aid proof construction.
2. <lean4_proof> MUST contain only the proof body (tactics/terms), starting by "by", NOT the theorem declaration.
3. <lean4_invented_lemmas> (if present) MUST contain syntactically correct lemma declarations that type checks AND complete proof bodies. Defining a lemma using `axiom` is NOT allowed.
4. <reasoning> contains high-level proof planning.
5. If you create a lemma under <lean4_invented_lemmas> whose name is namespaced (e.g., X.Y.Z), you MUST always refer to it using its fully qualified name. Do NOT rely on shortened names. For example, write rw [X.Y.Z], not rw [Z] for invented lemmas.
6. All Lean 4 code MUST be syntactically correct. No `sorry`, `admit`, or non-Lean text. Comments allowed using `--` or `/- ... -/`.
7. Follow the tags and structure EXACTLY. No extra text before, between, or after the sections.
8. Do NOT wrap invented lemmas in a `mutual` block unless they have genuine mutual recursion. Declare each lemma independently.

### Examples are provided here (example input are under "User Prompt", and example assistant response are under "Agent Response"):
Example 1 ------------------- 
User Prompt:
<used_lib_defs>
structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
  /-- Construct a `BitVec w` from a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  ofFin ::

  /-- Interpret a bitvector as a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  toFin : Fin (hPow 2 w)
</used_lib_defs>

<repo_lemmas>
theorem List.getElem_append_left{α : Type u_1} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {i : Nat} (hn : i < l₁.length) :\n(l₁ ++ l₂)[i] = l₁[i]
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Computability.NFA
import Mathlib.Data.FinEnum
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Blase.AutoStructs.ForLean

open Set
open Mathlib
open SetRel

-- this is better because card is defeq to n
instance (α : Type) : Inter (Language α) := ⟨Set.inter⟩
instance (α : Type) : Union (Language α) := ⟨Set.union⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width.
-/
structure BitVecs (n : Nat) where
  w : Nat
  bvs : List.Vector (BitVec w) n

def BitVecs.cast (bvs : BitVecs n) (h : n = n') : BitVecs n' :=
  { w := bvs.w, bvs := h ▸ bvs.bvs }

abbrev BitVecs.empty : BitVecs n := ⟨0, List.Vector.replicate n .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.singleton {w : Nat} (bv : BitVec w) : BitVecs 1 := ⟨w, bv ::ᵥ .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.pair {w : Nat} (bv1 bv2 : BitVec w) : BitVecs 2 := ⟨w, bv1 ::ᵥ bv2 ::ᵥ .nil⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width, encoded as a list of
bit vectors of width `n`. The width of the encoded bit vectors is the length of
the list.
-/
abbrev BitVecs' (n : Nat) := List (BitVec n)

@[simps]
def dec (bvs' : BitVecs' n) : BitVecs n where
  w := bvs'.length
  bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k => BitVec.ofFn fun i => bvs'[i].getLsbD k

@[simp]
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma dec_snoc n (bvs' : BitVecs' n) (a : BitVec n) :
  dec (bvs' ++ [a]) =
    { w := bvs'.length + 1
      bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k =>
        BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k) } :=
</target_theorem>

Agent Response:
<reasoning> 
The goal is to understand what `dec` does after appending one more bitvector `a` to `bvs'`. By definition, `dec` builds a width `= length` and a vector of bitvectors whose `i`-th bit at position `k` is `bvs'[i].getLsbD k`. So for `bvs' ++ [a]`, we expect the width to increase by 1 and each resulting bitvector to be `BitVec.cons` of the new bit coming from `a`.

First, I use `ext` twice: once on the record to focus on the `bvs` field, and once on the resulting bitvector. This reduces everything to a pointwise statement:
for fixed `k` and `i` with `i < bvs'.length + 1`,
the bit `(bvs' ++ [a])[i].getLsbD k` should match the bit at index `i` of `BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k)`.

At this point I need a clean description of indexing into `BitVec.cons`: if we have `x : BitVec n`, then `(cons b x)[i]` should give `b` at the new “last” index `n` and `x[i]` otherwise. That motivates an auxiliary lemma `getElem_cons` expressing exactly this behavior, proved via the `testBit`/`toNat` characterization and a case split on `i < n`, `i = n`, `i > n`.

Using `getElem_cons`, the RHS becomes an `if` on whether `i = bvs'.length`. So I split into cases:
- If `i = bvs'.length`, then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i]` is the appended `a`, so both sides reduce to `a.getLsbD k`.
- If `i ≠ bvs'.length`, the bound `i < bvs'.length + 1` forces `i < bvs'.length`. Then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i] = bvs'[i]` by `List.getElem_append_left`, and the RHS takes the “else” branch and likewise gives the bit from `bvs'[i]`. In both subcases, `simp` (plus the definition of `dec`) finishes.

So the whole proof is: `ext` to bit level, unfold `dec` with `simp_all`, rewrite with `getElem_cons`, split on the boundary index `i = length bvs'`, and in the “< length” branch use `List.getElem_append_left` and bounds to line up both sides.
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
@[grind =]
theorem getElem_cons {b : Bool} {n} {x : BitVec n} {i : Nat} (h : i < n + 1) :
    (cons b x)[i] = if h : i = n then b else x[i] := by
  simp only [BitVec.getElem_eq_testBit_toNat, BitVec.toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
  rw [Nat.testBit_shiftLeft]
  rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i n with i_lt_n | i_eq_n | n_lt_i
  · have p1 : ¬(n ≤ i) := by omega
    have p2 : i ≠ n := by omega
    simp [p1, p2]
  · simp only [i_eq_n, ge_iff_le, Nat.le_refl, decide_true, Nat.sub_self, Nat.testBit_zero,
    Bool.true_and, BitVec.testBit_toNat, BitVec.getLsbD_of_ge, Bool.or_false]
    cases b <;> trivial
  · have p1 : i ≠ n := by omega
    have p2 : i - n ≠ 0 := by omega
    simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_toNat]
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
by
  ext k i hi <;> simp_all
  rw [getElem_cons]
  split
  next heq => simp_all
  next h =>
    have hlt : i < List.length bvs' := by simp at hi; omega
    rw [List.getElem_append_left hlt]
    simp
</lean4_proof>

### Your task:
<used_lib_defs>
String in Init.Prelude
Nat in Init.Prelude
Bool in Init.Prelude
Int in Init.Data.Int.Basic
Finmap in Mathlib.Data.Finmap
BEq in Init.Prelude
List in Init.Prelude
Repr in Init.Data.Repr
Vector in Init.Data.Vector.Basic
bool in Init.Control.Basic
ite in Init.Prelude
Computation in Mathlib.Data.Seq.Computation
Option in Init.Prelude
Max in Init.Prelude
Max.max in Init.Prelude
WellFounded in Init.WF
move in Ssreflect.Basic
sapply in Ssreflect.ApplyIn
srw in Ssreflect.Rewrite
t in Ssreflect.IntroPats
sby in Ssreflect.Done
Finmap.Disjoint in Mathlib.Data.Finmap
</used_lib_defs>

<used_repo_defs>
notation:max "emp" => hempty

syntax "fun" ident+ " => " lang : lang

syntax "⟨" term "⟩" : lang

syntax "⟨" term ":" term "⟩" : lang

macro "xsimp" : tactic =>
  `(tactic| (
    xsimp_start
    repeat xsimp_step
    try rev_pure
    try hide_mvars
    try hsimp
    rotate_left

  ))

macro "xif" : tactic => do
  `(tactic|
  (xseq_xlet_if_needed; xstruct_if_needed; apply xif_lemma))

macro "xif" : tactic => `(tactic| (xwp; xif))

syntax " := " : bop

macro "xstruct" : tactic => do
  `(tactic| apply xstruct_lemma)

macro "xval" : tactic => do
  `(tactic| (xstruct_if_needed; apply xval_lemma))

macro "xval" : tactic => `(tactic| (xwp; xval))

macro "xapp" : tactic =>
  `(tactic|
    (xapp_nosubst;
     try xapp_try_subst
     first
       | done
       | all_goals try srw wp_equiv
         all_goals try subst_vars))

notation:max "⌜" P "⌝" => hpure P

macro "xwp" : tactic =>
  `(tactic|
    (intros
     first | apply xwp_lemma_fix; rfl
           | apply xwp_lemma_fun; rfl))

macro "xwp" : tactic =>
  `(tactic|
    (intros
     try srw trm_apps1
     srw ?trm_apps2
     first
           
           | (apply xwp_lemma_funs; rfl; rfl; rfl; sdone)=> //
           | apply wp_of_wpgen
     all_goals try simp [wpgen, subst, isubst, subst, trm_apps, AList.lookup, List.dlookup]))

macro "xseq" : tactic => do
  `(tactic| (xstruct_if_needed; apply xseq_lemma))

macro "xchange" l:term : tactic =>
  `(tactic| (xchange_core $l; xsimp))

macro "∃ʰ" xs:Lean.explicitBinders ", " b:term : term => Lean.expandExplicitBinders ``hexists xs b

macro "xpull" : tactic =>
  `(tactic| (
    xpull_start
    repeat' xsimp_step
    try rev_pure
    hsimp
  ))

macro_rules
  | `([lang| ()])                       => `(trm_val (val_unit))
  | `([lang| $n:num])                   => `(trm_val (val_int $n))
  | `([lang| $t1 $t2])                  => `(trm_app [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| if $t1 then $t2 else $t3]) => `(trm_if [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2] [lang| $t3])
  | `([lang| if $t1 then $t2 end])      => `(trm_if [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2] (trm_val val_unit))
  | `([lang| let $x := $t1:lang in $t2:lang])     =>
    `(trm_let $(%x) [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| ref $x := $t1:lang in $t2:lang])     =>
    `(trm_ref $(%x) [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| alloc $t1:lang as $x in $t2:lang])   =>
    `(trm_alloc $(%x) [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 ; $t2])                => `(trm_seq [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| fun_ $xs* => $t])             => do
    let xs <- xs.mapM fun x => `(term| $(%x))
    `(trm_funs [ $xs,* ] [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| fun $xs* => $t])             => do
    let xs <- xs.mapM fun x => `(term| $(%x))
    `(val_funs [ $xs,* ] [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| fix_ $f $xs* => $t])    => do
      let xs <- xs.mapM fun x => `(term| $(%x))
      `(trm_fixs $(%f) [ $xs,* ] [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| fix $f $xs* => $t])    => do
      let xs <- xs.mapM fun x => `(term| $(%x))
      `(val_fixs $(%f) [ $xs,* ] [lang| $t])
  
  | `([lang| free $t])                  => `(trm_val (val_prim val_free) [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| not $t])                   => `(trm_val (val_prim val_not) [lang| $t])
  
  | `([lang| !$t])                      => `(trm_val val_get [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| $t1 := $t2])               => `(trm_val val_set [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 + $t2])                => `(trm_val val_add [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 * $t2])                => `(trm_val val_mul [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 - $t2])                => `(trm_val val_sub [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 / $t2])                => `(trm_val val_div [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 < $t2])                => `(trm_val val_lt [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 > $t2])                => `(trm_val val_gt [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 <= $t2])               => `(trm_val val_le [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 >= $t2])               => `(trm_val val_ge [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| -$t])                      => `(trm_val val_opp [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| $t1 = $t2])                => `(trm_val val_eq [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 != $t2])               => `(trm_val val_neq [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 mod $t2])              => `(trm_val val_mod [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| $t1 ++ $t2])               => `(trm_val val_ptr_add [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2])
  | `([lang| ($t)]) => `([lang| $t])
  | `([lang| ⟨$t : $tp⟩]) => `(trm_val (($t : $tp)))
  | `([lang| for $x in [$n1 : $n2] { $t } ]) =>
    `(trm_for $(%x) [lang| $n1] [lang| $n2] [lang| $t])
  | `([lang| while $c:lang { $t:lang } ]) =>
     `(trm_while [lang| $c] [lang| $t] )

macro_rules
  | `([lang| len $p])                => `(trm_val val_array_length [lang| $p])
  | `([lang| $arr[$i] ])              => `(trm_val val_array_get [lang| $arr] [lang| $i])
  
  | `([lang| $arr[$i] := $v])        => `(trm_app val_array_set [lang| $arr] [lang| $i] [lang| $v])
  | `([lang| mkarr $n:lang $v:lang]) => `(trm_val val_array_make [lang| $n] [lang| $v])

macro_rules
  | `({ $P }[$t:lang]{$v, $Q}) => `(triple [lang| $t] $P (fun $v => $Q))
  | `({ $P }[$t:lang]{$Q})     => `(triple [lang| $t] $P (fun _ => $Q))
  | `(WP[$t:lang]{$v, $Q})     => `(wp [lang| $t] (fun $v => $Q))
  | `(WP[$t:lang]{$Q})         => `(wp [lang| $t] (fun _ => $Q))

macro_rules
  | `(tactic| xstep $(t)? ) => `(tactic| (xwp; xapp $(t)?))

macro_rules | `($x ∗ $y)   => `(binop% HStar.hStar $x $y)

  inductive trm : Type where
    | trm_val   : val -> trm
    | trm_var   : var -> trm
    | trm_fun   : var -> trm -> trm
    | trm_fix   : var -> var -> trm -> trm
    | trm_app   : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_seq   : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_let   : var -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_if    : trm -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_for   : var -> trm -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_while : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_ref   : var → trm → trm → trm
    | trm_alloc : var → trm → trm → trm

  inductive val : Type where
    | val_unit   : val
    | val_bool   : Bool → val
    | val_int    : Int → val
    | val_real   : ℝ → val
    | val_loc    : loc → val
    | val_prim   : prim → val
    | val_fun    : var -> trm -> val
    | val_fix    : var -> var -> trm -> val
    | val_uninit : val
    | val_error : val

inductive prim where
  
  | val_get : prim
  | val_set : prim
  
  | val_neg : prim
  | val_opp : prim
  | val_eq : prim
  | val_add : prim
  | val_neq : prim
  | val_sub : prim
  | val_mul : prim
  | val_div : prim
  | val_mod : prim
  
  | val_le : prim
  | val_lt : prim
  | val_ge : prim
  | val_gt : prim
  | val_ptr_add : prim

abbrev var := String

abbrev loc := Nat

def hProp := heap -> Prop

abbrev heap := Heap.heap val

abbrev Heap.heap (val : Type) := Finmap (λ _ : loc ↦ val)

inductive eval : state → trm → (val → state → Prop) -> Prop where
  | eval_val : forall s v Q,
      Q v s ->
      eval s (trm_val v) Q
  | eval_fun : forall s x t1 Q,
      Q (val_fun x t1) s ->
      eval s (trm_fun x t1) Q
  | eval_fix : forall s f x t1 Q,
      Q (val_fix f x t1) s ->
      eval s (trm_fix f x t1) Q
  | eval_app_arg1 : forall s1 t1 t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t1 ->
      eval s1 t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 t2) Q) ->
      eval s1 (trm_app t1 t2) Q
  | eval_app_arg2 : forall s1 (v1 : val) t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t2 ->
      eval s1 t2 Q1 ->
      (forall v2 s2, Q1 v2 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 v2) Q) ->
      eval s1 (trm_app v1 t2) Q
  | eval_app_fun : forall s1 v1 (v2 :val) x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fun x t1 ->
      eval s1 (subst x v2 t1) Q ->
      eval s1 (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | eval_app_fix : forall s (v1 v2 : val) f x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fix f x t1 ->
      eval s (subst x v2 (subst f v1 t1)) Q ->
      eval s (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | eval_seq : forall Q1 s t1 t2 Q,
      eval s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 t2 Q) ->
      eval s (trm_seq t1 t2) Q
  | eval_let : forall Q1 s x t1 t2 Q,
      eval s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (subst x v1 t2) Q) ->
      eval s (trm_let x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_if : forall s (b : Bool) t1 t2 Q,
      eval s (if b then t1 else t2) Q ->
      eval s (trm_if (val_bool b) t1 t2) Q
  | eval_unop : forall op s v1 P Q,
      evalunop op v1 P ->
      purepostin s P Q ->
      eval s (trm_app op v1) Q
  | eval_binop : forall op s (v1 v2 : val) P Q,
      evalbinop op v1 v2 P ->
      purepostin s P Q ->
      eval s (trm_app (trm_app op v1) v2) Q
  | eval_ref : forall s x t1 t2 (Q Q₁ : val → state → Prop),
    eval s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v1 s1, Q₁ v1 s1 → ∀ p ∉ s1,
     eval (s1.insert p v1) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s.erase p)) →
    eval s (trm_ref x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_get : forall s p Q,
      p ∈ s ->
      Q (read_state p s) s ->
      eval s (trm_app val_get (val_loc p)) Q
  | eval_set : forall s p v Q,
      v = trm_val v' ->
      p ∈ s ->
      Q val_unit (Finmap.insert p v' s) ->
      eval s (trm_app (trm_app val_set (val_loc p)) v) Q
  | eval_alloc_arg : forall s Q₁ Q,
    ¬ trm_is_val t1 →
    eval s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v' s', Q₁ v' s' → eval s' (trm_alloc x v' t2) Q) →
    eval s (trm_alloc x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_alloc : forall (sa : state) (n : ℤ) Q,
    n ≥ 0 →
    (∀ (p : loc) (sb : state),
      sb = conseq (make_list n.natAbs val_uninit) p →
      p ≠ null →
      Finmap.Disjoint sa sb →
      eval (sb ∪ sa) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s \ sb)) →
    eval sa (trm_alloc x n t2) Q
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  | eval_for (n₁ n₂ : Int) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    eval s (if (n₁ < n₂) then
               (trm_seq (subst x n₁ t₁) (trm_for x (val_int (n₁ + 1)) n₂ t₁))
            else val_unit) Q ->
    eval s (trm_for x n₁ n₂ t₁) Q
  | eval_while (t₁ t₂ : trm) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    eval s t₁ Q₁ ->
    (∀ s v, Q₁ v s -> eval s (trm_if v (trm_seq t₂ (trm_while t₁ t₂)) val_unit) Q) ->
    eval s (trm_while t₁ t₂) Q

class HStar (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   
  hStar : α → β → γ

def hpure (P : Prop) : hProp :=
  hexists (fun (_ : P) => emp)

def hexists {A} (J : A → hProp) : hProp :=
  fun h => exists x, J x h

def hempty : hProp :=
  fun h => (h = ∅)

abbrev himpl (H1 H2 : hProp) : Prop :=
  forall h, H1 h -> H2 h

def qimpl {A} (Q1 Q2 : A → hProp) : Prop :=
  forall (v:A), Q1 v ==> Q2 v

def purepostin (s : state) (P : val → Prop) (Q : val → state → Prop) : Prop :=
  
  forall v, P v → Q v s

abbrev state := Finmap (λ _ : loc ↦ val)

abbrev tohProp (h : heap -> Prop) : hProp := h

abbrev ofhProp (h : val -> hProp) : val -> heap -> Prop := h

infixr:51 " ==> " => himpl

infixr:51 " ===> " => qimpl

notation:max "emp" => hempty

infixr:55 " ∗ " => HStar.hStar

notation:max "⌜" P "⌝" => hpure P

notation "funloc" p "↦" H =>
  fun (r : val) ↦ hexists (fun p ↦ ⌜r = val_loc p⌝ ∗ H)
</used_repo_defs>

<repo_lemmas>
lemma eval_conseq s t Q1 Q2 :
  eval s t Q1 →
  Q1 ===> Q2 →
  eval s t Q2

lemma qstarE α (Q1 : α → hProp)  (H : hProp):
  Q1 ∗ H = fun x => Q1 x ∗ H

lemma eval_frame (h1 h2 : state) t (Q : val -> hProp) :
  eval h1 t (ofhProp Q) →
  Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 →
  eval (h1 ∪ h2) t (Q ∗ (tohProp (fun h ↦ h = h2)))

lemma hstar_comm H1 H2 :
  H1 ∗ H2 = H2 ∗ H1

lemma hprop_op_comm (op : hProp → hProp → hProp) :
  (forall H1 H2, op H1 H2 ==> op H2 H1) →
  (forall H1 H2, op H1 H2 = op H2 H1)

lemma himpl_antisym H1 H2:
  (H1 ==> H2) → (H2 ==> H1) → (H1 = H2)

lemma hstar_inv (H1 H2 : hProp) h:
  (H1 ∗ H2) h →
  exists h1 h2, H1 h1 ∧ H2 h2 ∧ Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 ∧ h = h1 ∪ h2

lemma himpl_trans H2 H1 H3 :
  (H1 ==> H2) → (H2 ==> H3) → (H1 ==> H3)
</repo_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Lean

import Mathlib.Data.Finmap

import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes

import SPLean.Common.State

import SPLean.Common.Util

import SPLean.Theories.HProp

import SPLean.Theories.XSimp

import SPLean.Theories.XChange

import SPLean.Theories.SepLog

import SPLean.Theories.WPUtil

open trm val prim

namespace Theories

def wp (t : trm) (Q : val → hProp) : hProp :=
  fun s ↦ eval s t Q

section tactics

open Lean Elab Tactic

section xapp

end xapp

end tactics

open AList

section funs_fixs_eval_like

variable (xs : List var) (vs : List val) (t : trm) (v0 : trm)
  (heqt : t = trm_apps v0 ts)
  (hconv : trms_to_vals ts = vs)
  (hform : var_funs xs vs.length)   -- NOTE: can be relaxed to `vs.length ≤ xs.length`

variable (f : var) (hf : f ∉ xs)

end funs_fixs_eval_like

end Theories

open Theories

open Lean.Elab.Tactic in
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma xwhile_inv_basic_lemma (I : Bool -> α -> hProp) R
  -- (F1 F2 : formula)
  :
  WellFounded R ->
  -- structural F1 ->
  -- structural F2 ->
  (H ==> H' ∗ ∃ʰ b a, I b a) ->
  (∀ b X, I b X ==> wp F1 (fun bv => I b X ∗ ⌜bv = b⌝)) ->
  (∀ X, I true X ==> wp F2 (fun _ => ∃ʰ b X', ⌜R X' X⌝ ∗ I b X')) ->
  H ==> wp (trm_while F1 F2) (fun _ => H' ∗ ∃ʰ a, I false a) :=
</target_theorem>

