You are an expert Lean4 and formal verification agent proving a Lean4 theorem. Your output **must** strictly adhere to the specified format.

### Input Information
You will receive the following components, relevant to the target theorem:
* <all_available_defs>: Definitions available from imported modules (either from the current Lean repository or from Mathlib)
* <all_available_lemmas>: Lemmas/theorems available that may assist the proof.
* <local_ctx>...</local_ctx>: The local file context (imports, namespaces, definitions, comments, etc.) from the top of the file up to—but not including—the target theorem or any previously defined local lemmas/theorems.
* <target_theorem>...</target_theorem>: The target theorem statement, ending with `:=`.

**Notes**
1. Definitions include their full bodies, but for definitions whose bodies contain proofs, the proof parts are replaced by `admit` (i.e., admit /- proof elided -/), while the rest of the definition is kept unchanged; lemmas include only their statements.
2. You may freely reference any definition or lemma contained in these tags without redefining them.
3. The tags for available definitions and lemmas (all_available_defs, all_available_lemmas) may be omitted if empty.

### Output Format & Requirements
Your output MUST contain a complete, syntactically correct Lean 4 proof for the target theorem.

**Strict Output Structure:**
<reasoning> 
...
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
-- each lemma is a full Lean 4 declaration with a complete proof
...
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
-- Lean 4 proof body of the target theorem
...
</lean4_proof>

**Requirements:**
1. <reasoning> and <lean4_invented_lemmas> are OPTIONAL. Include them only if they aid proof construction.
2. <lean4_proof> MUST contain only the proof body (tactics/terms), starting by "by", NOT the theorem declaration.
3. <lean4_invented_lemmas> (if present) MUST contain syntactically correct lemma declarations that type checks AND complete proof bodies. Defining a lemma using `axiom` is NOT allowed.
4. <reasoning> contains high-level proof planning.
5. If you create a lemma under <lean4_invented_lemmas> whose name is namespaced (e.g., X.Y.Z), you MUST always refer to it using its fully qualified name. Do NOT rely on shortened names. For example, write rw [X.Y.Z], not rw [Z] for invented lemmas.
6. All Lean 4 code MUST be syntactically correct. No `sorry`, `admit`, or non-Lean text. Comments allowed using `--` or `/- ... -/`.
7. Follow the tags and structure EXACTLY. No extra text before, between, or after the sections.
8. Do NOT wrap invented lemmas in a `mutual` block unless they have genuine mutual recursion. Declare each lemma independently.

### Examples are provided here (example input are under "User Prompt", and example assistant response are under "Agent Response"):
Example 1 ------------------- 
User Prompt:
<all_available_defs>
structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
  /-- Construct a `BitVec w` from a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  ofFin ::

  /-- Interpret a bitvector as a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  toFin : Fin (hPow 2 w)
</all_available_defs>

<all_available_lemmas>
theorem List.getElem_append_left{α : Type u_1} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {i : Nat} (hn : i < l₁.length) : (l₁ ++ l₂)[i] = l₁[i]
theorem getElem_eq_testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (h : i < w) :
  x[i] = x.toNat.testBit i := rfl
@[simp, grind =] theorem toNat_cons (b : Bool) (x : BitVec w) :
    (cons b x).toNat = (b.toNat <<< w) ||| x.toNat
@[simp, grind =] theorem getLsbD_of_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : w ≤ i) : getLsbD x i = false
theorem testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) : x.toNat.testBit i = x.getLsbD i
</all_available_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Computability.NFA
import Mathlib.Data.FinEnum
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Blase.AutoStructs.ForLean

open Set
open Mathlib
open SetRel

-- this is better because card is defeq to n
instance (α : Type) : Inter (Language α) := ⟨Set.inter⟩
instance (α : Type) : Union (Language α) := ⟨Set.union⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width.
-/
structure BitVecs (n : Nat) where
  w : Nat
  bvs : List.Vector (BitVec w) n

def BitVecs.cast (bvs : BitVecs n) (h : n = n') : BitVecs n' :=
  { w := bvs.w, bvs := h ▸ bvs.bvs }

abbrev BitVecs.empty : BitVecs n := ⟨0, List.Vector.replicate n .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.singleton {w : Nat} (bv : BitVec w) : BitVecs 1 := ⟨w, bv ::ᵥ .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.pair {w : Nat} (bv1 bv2 : BitVec w) : BitVecs 2 := ⟨w, bv1 ::ᵥ bv2 ::ᵥ .nil⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width, encoded as a list of
bit vectors of width `n`. The width of the encoded bit vectors is the length of
the list.
-/
abbrev BitVecs' (n : Nat) := List (BitVec n)

@[simps]
def dec (bvs' : BitVecs' n) : BitVecs n where
  w := bvs'.length
  bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k => BitVec.ofFn fun i => bvs'[i].getLsbD k

@[simp]
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma dec_snoc n (bvs' : BitVecs' n) (a : BitVec n) :
  dec (bvs' ++ [a]) =
    { w := bvs'.length + 1
      bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k =>
        BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k) } :=
</target_theorem>

Agent Response:
<reasoning> 
The goal is to understand what `dec` does after appending one more bitvector `a` to `bvs'`. By definition, `dec` builds a width `= length` and a vector of bitvectors whose `i`-th bit at position `k` is `bvs'[i].getLsbD k`. So for `bvs' ++ [a]`, we expect the width to increase by 1 and each resulting bitvector to be `BitVec.cons` of the new bit coming from `a`.

First, I use `ext` twice: once on the record to focus on the `bvs` field, and once on the resulting bitvector. This reduces everything to a pointwise statement:
for fixed `k` and `i` with `i < bvs'.length + 1`,
the bit `(bvs' ++ [a])[i].getLsbD k` should match the bit at index `i` of `BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k)`.

At this point I need a clean description of indexing into `BitVec.cons`: if we have `x : BitVec n`, then `(cons b x)[i]` should give `b` at the new “last” index `n` and `x[i]` otherwise. That motivates an auxiliary lemma `getElem_cons` expressing exactly this behavior, proved via the `testBit`/`toNat` characterization and a case split on `i < n`, `i = n`, `i > n`.

Using `getElem_cons`, the RHS becomes an `if` on whether `i = bvs'.length`. So I split into cases:
- If `i = bvs'.length`, then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i]` is the appended `a`, so both sides reduce to `a.getLsbD k`.
- If `i ≠ bvs'.length`, the bound `i < bvs'.length + 1` forces `i < bvs'.length`. Then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i] = bvs'[i]` by `List.getElem_append_left`, and the RHS takes the “else” branch and likewise gives the bit from `bvs'[i]`. In both subcases, `simp` (plus the definition of `dec`) finishes.

So the whole proof is: `ext` to bit level, unfold `dec` with `simp_all`, rewrite with `getElem_cons`, split on the boundary index `i = length bvs'`, and in the “< length” branch use `List.getElem_append_left` and bounds to line up both sides.
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
@[grind =]
theorem getElem_cons {b : Bool} {n} {x : BitVec n} {i : Nat} (h : i < n + 1) :
    (cons b x)[i] = if h : i = n then b else x[i] := by
  simp only [BitVec.getElem_eq_testBit_toNat, BitVec.toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
  rw [Nat.testBit_shiftLeft]
  rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i n with i_lt_n | i_eq_n | n_lt_i
  · have p1 : ¬(n ≤ i) := by omega
    have p2 : i ≠ n := by omega
    simp [p1, p2]
  · simp only [i_eq_n, ge_iff_le, Nat.le_refl, decide_true, Nat.sub_self, Nat.testBit_zero,
    Bool.true_and, BitVec.testBit_toNat, BitVec.getLsbD_of_ge, Bool.or_false]
    cases b <;> trivial
  · have p1 : i ≠ n := by omega
    have p2 : i - n ≠ 0 := by omega
    simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_toNat]
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
by
  ext k i hi <;> simp_all
  rw [getElem_cons]
  split
  next heq => simp_all
  next h =>
    have hlt : i < List.length bvs' := by simp at hi; omega
    rw [List.getElem_append_left hlt]
    simp
</lean4_proof>

### Your task:
<all_available_defs>
def hProp := heap -> Prop

abbrev himpl (H1 H2 : hProp) : Prop :=
  forall h, H1 h -> H2 h

def qimpl {A} (Q1 Q2 : A → hProp) : Prop :=
  forall (v:A), Q1 v ==> Q2 v

class HStar (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   
  hStar : α → β → γ

abbrev loc := Nat

abbrev var := String

abbrev Heap.heap (val : Type) := Finmap (λ _ : loc ↦ val)

inductive prim where
  
  | val_get : prim
  | val_set : prim
  
  | val_neg : prim
  | val_opp : prim
  | val_eq : prim
  | val_add : prim
  | val_neq : prim
  | val_sub : prim
  | val_mul : prim
  | val_div : prim
  | val_mod : prim
  
  | val_le : prim
  | val_lt : prim
  | val_ge : prim
  | val_gt : prim
  | val_ptr_add : prim

inductive val : Type where
    | val_unit   : val
    | val_bool   : Bool → val
    | val_int    : Int → val
    | val_real   : ℝ → val
    | val_loc    : loc → val
    | val_prim   : prim → val
    | val_fun    : var -> trm -> val
    | val_fix    : var -> var -> trm -> val
    | val_uninit : val
    | val_error : val

inductive trm : Type where
    | trm_val   : val -> trm
    | trm_var   : var -> trm
    | trm_fun   : var -> trm -> trm
    | trm_fix   : var -> var -> trm -> trm
    | trm_app   : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_seq   : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_let   : var -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_if    : trm -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_for   : var -> trm -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_while : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_ref   : var → trm → trm → trm
    | trm_alloc : var → trm → trm → trm

abbrev state := Finmap (λ _ : loc ↦ val)

abbrev heap := Heap.heap val

def read_state (p : loc) (h : state) :=
  match Finmap.lookup p h with
  | some v => v
  | none   => default

def purepostin (s : state) (P : val → Prop) (Q : val → state → Prop) : Prop :=
  
  forall v, P v → Q v s

inductive eval : state → trm → (val → state → Prop) -> Prop where
  | eval_val : forall s v Q,
      Q v s ->
      eval s (trm_val v) Q
  | eval_fun : forall s x t1 Q,
      Q (val_fun x t1) s ->
      eval s (trm_fun x t1) Q
  | eval_fix : forall s f x t1 Q,
      Q (val_fix f x t1) s ->
      eval s (trm_fix f x t1) Q
  | eval_app_arg1 : forall s1 t1 t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t1 ->
      eval s1 t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 t2) Q) ->
      eval s1 (trm_app t1 t2) Q
  | eval_app_arg2 : forall s1 (v1 : val) t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t2 ->
      eval s1 t2 Q1 ->
      (forall v2 s2, Q1 v2 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 v2) Q) ->
      eval s1 (trm_app v1 t2) Q
  | eval_app_fun : forall s1 v1 (v2 :val) x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fun x t1 ->
      eval s1 (subst x v2 t1) Q ->
      eval s1 (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | eval_app_fix : forall s (v1 v2 : val) f x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fix f x t1 ->
      eval s (subst x v2 (subst f v1 t1)) Q ->
      eval s (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | eval_seq : forall Q1 s t1 t2 Q,
      eval s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 t2 Q) ->
      eval s (trm_seq t1 t2) Q
  | eval_let : forall Q1 s x t1 t2 Q,
      eval s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (subst x v1 t2) Q) ->
      eval s (trm_let x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_if : forall s (b : Bool) t1 t2 Q,
      eval s (if b then t1 else t2) Q ->
      eval s (trm_if (val_bool b) t1 t2) Q
  | eval_unop : forall op s v1 P Q,
      evalunop op v1 P ->
      purepostin s P Q ->
      eval s (trm_app op v1) Q
  | eval_binop : forall op s (v1 v2 : val) P Q,
      evalbinop op v1 v2 P ->
      purepostin s P Q ->
      eval s (trm_app (trm_app op v1) v2) Q
  | eval_ref : forall s x t1 t2 (Q Q₁ : val → state → Prop),
    eval s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v1 s1, Q₁ v1 s1 → ∀ p ∉ s1,
     eval (s1.insert p v1) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s.erase p)) →
    eval s (trm_ref x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_get : forall s p Q,
      p ∈ s ->
      Q (read_state p s) s ->
      eval s (trm_app val_get (val_loc p)) Q
  | eval_set : forall s p v Q,
      v = trm_val v' ->
      p ∈ s ->
      Q val_unit (Finmap.insert p v' s) ->
      eval s (trm_app (trm_app val_set (val_loc p)) v) Q
  | eval_alloc_arg : forall s Q₁ Q,
    ¬ trm_is_val t1 →
    eval s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v' s', Q₁ v' s' → eval s' (trm_alloc x v' t2) Q) →
    eval s (trm_alloc x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_alloc : forall (sa : state) (n : ℤ) Q,
    n ≥ 0 →
    (∀ (p : loc) (sb : state),
      sb = conseq (make_list n.natAbs val_uninit) p →
      p ≠ null →
      Finmap.Disjoint sa sb →
      eval (sb ∪ sa) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s \ sb)) →
    eval sa (trm_alloc x n t2) Q
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  | eval_for (n₁ n₂ : Int) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    eval s (if (n₁ < n₂) then
               (trm_seq (subst x n₁ t₁) (trm_for x (val_int (n₁ + 1)) n₂ t₁))
            else val_unit) Q ->
    eval s (trm_for x n₁ n₂ t₁) Q
  | eval_while (t₁ t₂ : trm) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    eval s t₁ Q₁ ->
    (∀ s v, Q₁ v s -> eval s (trm_if v (trm_seq t₂ (trm_while t₁ t₂)) val_unit) Q) ->
    eval s (trm_while t₁ t₂) Q

inductive evalExact : state → trm → (val → state → Prop) -> Prop where
  | val : forall s v,
      evalExact s (trm_val v) (fun v' s' ↦ v' = v ∧ s' = s)
  | fun : forall s x t1,
      evalExact s (trm_fun x t1) (fun v' s' ↦ v' = val_fun x t1 ∧ s' = s)
  | fix : forall s f x t1,
      evalExact s (trm_fix f x t1) (fun v' s' ↦ v' = val_fix f x t1 ∧ s' = s)
  | app_arg1 : forall s1 t1 t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t1 ->
      evalExact s1 t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> evalExact s2 (trm_app v1 t2) Q) ->
      evalExact s1 (trm_app t1 t2) Q
  | app_arg2 : forall s1 (v1 : val) t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t2 ->
      evalExact s1 t2 Q1 ->
      (forall v2 s2, Q1 v2 s2 -> evalExact s2 (trm_app v1 v2) Q) ->
      evalExact s1 (trm_app v1 t2) Q
  | app_fun : forall s1 v1 (v2 :val) x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fun x t1 ->
      evalExact s1 (subst x v2 t1) Q ->
      evalExact s1 (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | app_fix : forall s (v1 v2 : val) f x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fix f x t1 ->
      evalExact s (subst x v2 (subst f v1 t1)) Q ->
      evalExact s (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | seq : forall Q1 s t1 t2 Q,
      evalExact s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> evalExact s2 t2 Q) ->
      evalExact s (trm_seq t1 t2) Q
  | let : forall Q1 s x t1 t2 Q,
      evalExact s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> evalExact s2 (subst x v1 t2) Q) ->
      evalExact s (trm_let x t1 t2) Q
  | if : forall s (b : Bool) t1 t2 Q,
      evalExact s (if b then t1 else t2) Q ->
      evalExact s (trm_if (val_bool b) t1 t2) Q
  | unop : forall op s v1 P,
      evalunop op v1 P ->
      evalExact s (trm_app op v1) (purepost s P)
  | binop : forall op s (v1 v2 : val) P,
      evalbinop op v1 v2 P ->
      evalExact s (trm_app (trm_app op v1) v2) (purepost s P)
  | ref : forall s x t1 t2 Q Q₁,
    evalExact s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v1 s1, Q₁ v1 s1 → ∀ p ∉ s1,
     evalExact (s1.insert p v1) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s.erase p)) →
      evalExact s (trm_ref x t1 t2) Q
  | get : forall s p,
      p ∈ s ->
      evalExact s (trm_app val_get (val_loc p))
        (fun v' s' ↦ v' = read_state p s ∧ s' = s)
  | set : forall s p v,
      v = trm_val v' ->
      p ∈ s ->
      evalExact s (trm_app (trm_app val_set (val_loc p)) v)
        (fun v'' s' ↦ v'' = val_unit ∧ s' = s.insert p v')
  | alloc_arg : forall s Q₁ Q,
    ¬ trm_is_val t1 →
    evalExact s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v' s', Q₁ v' s' → evalExact s' (trm_alloc x v' t2) Q) →
    evalExact s (trm_alloc x t1 t2) Q
  | alloc : forall (sa : state) (n : ℤ) Q,
    n ≥ 0 →
    (∀ (p : loc) (sb : state),
      sb = conseq (make_list n.natAbs val_uninit) p →
      p ≠ null →
      Finmap.Disjoint sa sb →
      evalExact (sb ∪ sa) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s \ sb)) →
    evalExact sa (trm_alloc x n t2) Q
  
  
  
  
  
  
  | for (n₁ n₂ : Int) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    evalExact s (if (n₁ < n₂) then
               (trm_seq (subst x n₁ t₁) (trm_for x (val_int (n₁ + 1)) n₂ t₁))
            else val_unit) Q ->
    evalExact s (trm_for x n₁ n₂ t₁) Q
  | while (t₁ t₂ : trm) (Q Q₁ : val -> state -> Prop) :
    evalExact s t₁ Q₁ ->
    (∀ s v, Q₁ v s -> evalExact s (trm_if v (trm_seq t₂ (trm_while t₁ t₂)) val_unit) Q) ->
    evalExact s (trm_while t₁ t₂) Q

@[app_unexpander hforall] def unexpandHForall : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) fun $x:ident => h∀ $xs:binderIdent*, $b) => `(h∀ $x:ident $xs:binderIdent*, $b)
  | `($(_) fun $x:ident => $b)                     => `(h∀ $x:ident, $b)
  | `($(_) fun ($x:ident : $t) => $b)              => `(h∀ ($x:ident : $t), $b)
  | t                                              => pure t

Finmap.lookup in Mathlib.Data.Finmap

Lean.Syntax in Init.Prelude

List.kerase in Mathlib.Data.List.Sigma

def val_array_fill : val := [lang|
  fix f p i n v =>
    let b := n > 0 in
    if b then
      ((val_array_set p) i) v ;
      let m := n - 1 in
      let j := i + 1 in
      f p j m v
    end ]

Finmap.liftOn₂ in Mathlib.Data.Finmap

Option in Init.Prelude

Lean.PrettyPrinter.delab in Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator.Basic

abbrev XAppExtState := RBMap Name Name Name.cmp

example (L : List val) (i : Int) (_ : i.natAbs < L.length) :
  L[i.natAbs]! = L[i]! :=

Finset.Ico in Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs

partial def xsimp_step_r (xsimp : XSimpR) : TacticM Unit := do
  trace[xsimp] "RHS step"
  trace[xsimp] "hrt: {xsimp.hrt}"
  match xsimp.hlw, xsimp.hlt, xsimp.hrt with
  | `(hempty), `(hempty), `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ $h $_) =>
     
    try
      trace[xsimp] "xsimp_r deals with: {h}"
      match h with
      | `(hempty) => {| apply xsimp_r_hempty |}
      | `(hpure $_) => {| apply xsimp_r_hpure |}
      | `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ $h1 $h2) =>
        {| erw [@hstar_assoc $h1 $h2];
           simpNums |} 
                       
          
        xsimp_step_r (<- XSimpRIni)
      | `(@HWand.hWand hProp hProp $_ $_ $h1 $_) =>
        match h1 with
        | `(hpure $_) => {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
        | _ => {| apply xsimp_r_hwand_same |}
      | `(htop) =>
        match xsimp.hrg with
        | `(hempty) =>
          {| apply xsimpl_r_hgc_or_htop |}
          repeat'' do
            xsimp_pick_same h xsimp.hla
            {| apply xsimp_lr_cancel_same |}
        | `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ htop hempty) => {| apply xsimpl_r_htop_drop |}
        | _ => throwError "xsimp_step_r: @ unreachable"
      | `(@hexists $_ fun ($x:ident : $_) => $_) => xsimp_r_hexists_apply_hints x
      | `(protect $_) => {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
      | `(hsingle $x $_) =>
        
        if x.isMVarStx then
          {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
        else
          xsimp_pick_same_pointer x xsimp.hla
          
          
          {| apply xsimpl_lr_cancel_same_hsingle <;>
             xsimp_hsingle_discharge |}
      | _ =>
        if h.isMVarStx then
          {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
        else
        xsimp_pick_same h xsimp.hla
        {| apply xsimp_lr_cancel_same |}
    catch ex =>
      trace[xsimp] ex.toMessageData
      {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
  | _, _, _ => throwError "not implemented"

def wpgen_seq (F1 F2 : formula) : formula :=
  fun Q ↦ F1 (fun _ ↦ F2 Q)

partial def getNestedApp (t :Expr) : Expr :=
  let_expr trm_app t _ := t | getVal t
  getNestedApp t

def default_set : val := [lang|
  fun p i v =>
      let i := val_abs i in
      let L := val_array_length p in
      let b := i < L in
      if b then
        val_array_set p i v
      else
        () ]

Finmap.singleton in Mathlib.Data.Finmap

Nat in Init.Prelude

def hadd [PartialCommMonoid val] (H₁ H₂ : hProp) : hProp :=
  fun h => exists h1 h2, H₁ h1 ∧ H₂ h2 ∧ h1 ⊥ʰ h2 ∧ h = h1 +ʰ h2

def getGoalProp : Lean.Elab.Tactic.TacticM Q(Prop) := do
  let goal ← Lean.Elab.Tactic.getMainTarget
  match ← castToProp goal with
  | some qType => return qType
  | none => throwError "goal is not a proposition"

def test1 : Finmap (fun _ : ℕ ↦ ℕ) := Finmap.singleton 0 1

def hstars_simp_post :=
  {| hsimp ; try apply himpl_refl |}

macro "∃ʰ" xs:Lean.explicitBinders ", " b:term : term => Lean.expandExplicitBinders ``hexists xs b

AddCommMonoid in Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs

def hstar (H1 H2 : hProp) : hProp :=
  fun h => exists h1 h2,
    H1 h1 ∧ H2 h2 ∧ Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 ∧ h = h1 ∪ h2

noncomputable def AList.merge (h₁ h₂ : AList (fun _ : loc => val)) :  AList (fun _ : loc => val) :=
  ⟨kmerge h₁.entries h₂.entries, by admit /- proof elided -/
    ⟩

| step_neg : forall s b,
      step s (trm_app val_neg (val_bool b)) s (val_bool (¬ b))
  | step_opp : forall s n,
      step s (trm_app val_opp (val_int n)) s (val_int (- n))

scoped instance inst : PartialCommMonoidWRT val add valid where
  validE := by admit /- proof elided -/

def hcell (v : val) (p : loc) (i : Int) : hProp :=
  ((p + 1 + (Int.natAbs i)) ~~> v) ∗ ⌜i >= 0⌝

| step_eq : forall s v1 v2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_eq v1) v2) s (val_bool (is_true (v1 = v2)))
  | step_neq : forall s v1 v2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_neq v1) v2) s (val_bool (is_true (v1 ≠ v2)))
  | step_add : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_add (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_int (n1 + n2))
  | step_sub : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_sub (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_int (n1 - n2))
  | step_mul : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_mul (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_int (n1 * n2))
  | step_div : forall s n1 n2,
      n2 ≠ 0 →
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_div (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (n1 / n2)
  | step_mod : forall s n1 n2,
      n2 ≠ 0 →
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_mod (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (n1 % n2)
  | step_le : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_le (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_bool (n1 <= n2))
  | step_lt : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_lt (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_bool (n1 < n2))
  | step_ge : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_ge (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_bool (n1 >= n2))
  | step_gt : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_gt (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_bool (n1 > n2))
  | step_ptr_add : forall s p1 p2 n,
      (p2:ℤ) = (p1:loc) + n →
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_ptr_add (val_loc p1)) (val_int n)) s
        (val_loc (Int.toNat p2))

def evalExact_ref_nonpositive s x t1 t2 (Q : val → state → Prop) :=
  ∃ Q₁, evalExact s t1 Q₁ ∧
  (∀ v1 s1, Q₁ v1 s1 → ∀ p ∉ s1,
    (evalExact (s1.insert p v1) (subst x p t2) (fun v s ↦ Q v (s.erase p))))

def hstar_pick_lemma (i : Nat) (pickLast : Bool) : Ident :=
  if pickLast then
    mkIdent s!"hstar_pick_last_{i}".toName
  else
    mkIdent s!"hstar_pick_{i}".toName

@[app_unexpander triple] def unexpandTriple : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) [lang| $t] $P fun $v ↦ $Q) => `({ $P }[$t:lang]{$v, $Q})
  | _ => throw ( )

class AddCommMonoidWRT (α : Type) (add' : semiOutParam $ α -> α -> α) extends AddCommMonoid α where
  addE : (· + ·) = add'

Lean.Name in Init.Prelude

abbrev triple (t : trm) (H : hProp) (Q : val → hProp) : Prop :=
  forall s, H s → eval s t Q

class PartialCommMonoid (α : Type) extends AddCommSemigroup α where
  valid : α -> Prop
  valid_add : ∀ x, valid (x + y) -> valid x
  add_valid : ∀ x y, valid x -> valid y -> valid (x + y)

def xsimp_pick_applied (h hla : Term) : TacticM Unit := do
  let h <- Term.elabTerm h  none
  hstar_search hla fun i h' last? => do
    let h' <- Term.elabTerm h' none
    let numArgs + 1 := h'.getAppNumArgs' | throwError "not equal"
    let h' := h'.consumeMData.getAppPrefix numArgs
    let .true <-
      withAssignableSyntheticOpaque <| isDefEq h h' | throwError "not equal"
    xsimp_pick i last?

@[app_unexpander trm_fun] def unexpandTFun : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) $x:str [lang| fun $xs* => $t]) =>
    let str := x.getString
    let name := Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkSimple str
    `([lang| fun $name $xs* => $t])
  | `($(_) $x:str [lang| $t]) =>
    let str := x.getString
    let name := Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkSimple str
    `([lang| fun $name => $t])
  | _ => throw ( )

Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander in Init.Prelude

@[app_unexpander trm_fixs] def unexpandTFixs : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) $f:str [ $xs:str,* ] [lang| $t]) =>
    let xs := xs.getElems.map (Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkSimple ·.getString)
    let f := Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkSimple f.getString
    `([lang| fix $f $xs* => $t])
  | _ => throw ( )

Lean.throwError in Lean.Exception

WellFounded in Init.WF

def val_array_length : val := [lang|
  fun p => !p ]

Lean.Meta.unhygienic in Batteries.Lean.Meta.Basic

Lean.Meta.withAssignableSyntheticOpaque in Lean.Meta.Basic

def intersect (s1 s2 : state) := s1 \ (s1 \ s2)

def xsimp_flip_acc_lr (hla hra : Term) : TacticM Unit :=
  {| xsimp_flip_acc_l $hla ; xsimp_flip_acc_r $hra |}

def hsingle (p : loc) (v : val) : hProp :=
  fun h => (h = Finmap.singleton p v)

Lean.mkIdent in Init.Meta.Defs

Finmap.sdiff in Mathlib.Data.Finmap

def xsimp_pick (i : Nat) (last? : Bool) : TacticM Unit :=
   {| apply xsimp_pick_lemma
      · apply $(hstar_pick_lemma i last?) |}

Int.ofNat in Init.Data.Int.Basic

@[app_unexpander trm_var] def unexpandVar : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) $x:str) =>
    let str := x.getString
    let name := Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkSimple str
    `([lang| $name:ident])
  | _ => throw ( )

Int in Init.Data.Int.Basic

Finmap in Mathlib.Data.Finmap

def getVal (t :Expr) : Expr :=
  let_expr trm_val v := t | t
  getPrim v

Lean.unbracketedExplicitBinders in Init.NotationExtra

List.Perm in Init.Data.List.Basic

instance (A : Type) : HStar (A → hProp) hProp (A → hProp) where
  hStar := qstar

instance : Coe loc val where
  coe l := val.val_loc l

nsmulRec in Init.Data.Zero

@[simp]
abbrev var_funs (xs:List var) (n:Nat) : Prop :=
     xs.Nodup
  /\ xs.length = n
  /\ xs != []

| step_fun : forall s x t1,
      step s (trm_fun x t1) s (val_fun x t1)
  | step_fix : forall s f x t1,
      step s (trm_fix f x t1) s (val_fix f x t1)
  | step_app_fun : forall s v1 v2 x t1,
      v1 = val_fun x t1 →
      v2 = trm_val v2' →
      step s (trm_app v1 v2) s (subst x v2' t1)
  | step_app_fix : forall s v1 v2 f x t1,
      v1 = val_fix f x t1 →
      v2 = trm_val v2' →
      step s (trm_app v1 v2) s (subst x v2' (subst f v1 t1))
  | step_if : forall s b t1 t2,
      step s (trm_if (val_bool b) t1 t2) s (if b then t1 else t2)
  | step_seq : forall s t2 v1,
      step s (trm_seq v1 t2) s t2
  | step_let : forall s x t2 v1,
      v1 = trm_val v1' →
      step s (trm_let x v1 t2) s (subst x v1' t2)

ident in Ssreflect.IntroPats

local instance : HAdd ℕ ℤ val := ⟨fun x y => ((x : Int) + y)⟩

def XSimpRIni : TacticM XSimpR := withMainContext do
  (<- getMainGoal).setTag `xsimp_goal
  let goal <- getGoalStxNN
  let `(XSimp $hl $hr) := goal | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  let `(@Prod.mk hProp $_ $hla $hlwt) := hl | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  let `(@Prod.mk hProp hProp $hlw $hlt) := hlwt | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  let `(@Prod.mk hProp $_ $hra $hrgt) := hr | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  let `(@Prod.mk hProp hProp $hrg $hrt) := hrgt | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  return { hla := hla, hlw := hlw, hlt := hlt, hra := hra, hrg := hrg, hrt := hrt }

@[app_unexpander wp] def unexpandWP : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) [lang| $t] fun $v ↦ $Q) => `(WP[$t:lang]{$v, $Q})
  | _ => throw ( )

def mkstruct (F : formula) :=
  fun (Q : val -> hProp) ↦ ∃ʰ Q', F Q' ∗ (Q' -∗ Q)

def trm_funs (xs:List var) (t:trm) : trm :=
  match xs with
  | [] => t
  | x1::xs' => trm_fun x1 (trm_funs xs' t)

scoped instance (priority := low) : AddCommSemigroup val where
  add := add
  add_assoc := by admit /- proof elided -/

local instance : HWand (hProp) (heap → Prop) hProp where
  hWand := hwand

def hstars_simp_step : TacticM Unit := withMainContext do
  let goal <- getGoalStxNN
  match goal with
    | `(himpl $Hl $Hr) =>
        match Hr with
          | `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ $_ $hs) =>
              match hs with
              | `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ $H $_) =>
                    try
                      xsimp_pick_same H Hl hstars_simp_pick ;
                      {| apply hstars_simp_cancel_lemma |}
                    catch ex =>
                      let s <- ex.toMessageData.toString
                      if s == "not equal" then
                        {| apply hstars_simp_keep_lemma |}
                      else
                        throw ex
              | _ => throwError "cannot simplify"
          | _ => throwError "cannot simplify"
    | _ => throwError "cannot simplify"

inductive evalbinop : val → val → val → (val->Prop) → Prop where
  | evalbinop_eq : forall v1 v2,
      evalbinop val_eq v1 v2 (fun v => v = val_bool (is_true (v1 = v2)))
  | evalbinop_neq : forall v1 v2,
      evalbinop val_neq v1 v2 (fun v => v = val_bool (is_true (v1 ≠ v2)))
  | evalbinop_add : forall n1 n2,
      evalbinop val_add (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_int (n1 + n2))
  | evalbinop_addr : forall r₁ r₂,
      evalbinop val_add (val_real r₁) (val_real r₂)
        (fun v => v = val_real (r₁ + r₂))
  | evalbinop_sub : forall n1 n2,
      evalbinop val_sub (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_int (n1 - n2))
  | evalbinop_subr : forall r1 r2,
      evalbinop val_sub (val_real r1) (val_real r2)
        (fun v => v = val_real (r1 - r2))
  | evalbinop_mul : forall n1 n2,
      evalbinop val_mul (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_int (n1 * n2))
  | evalbinop_mulr : forall r1 r2,
      evalbinop val_mul (val_real r1) (val_real r2)
        (fun v => v = val_real (r1 * r2))
  | evalbinop_div : forall n1 n2,
      ¬(n2 = 0) →
      evalbinop val_div (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_int (n1 / n2))
  | evalbinop_divr : forall r1 r2,
      ¬(r2 = 0) →
      evalbinop val_div (val_real r1) (val_real r2)
        (fun v => v = val_real (r1 / r2))
  | evalbinop_mod : forall n1 n2,
      ¬(n2 = 0) →
      evalbinop val_mod (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_int (n1 % n2))
  | evalbinop_le : forall n1 n2,
      evalbinop val_le (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_bool (n1 <= n2))
  | evalbinop_ler : forall r1 r2,
      evalbinop val_le (val_real r1) (val_real r2)
        (fun v => v = val_bool (r1 <= r2))
  | evalbinop_lt : forall n1 n2,
      evalbinop val_lt (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_bool (n1 < n2))
  | evalbinop_ltr : forall r1 r2,
      evalbinop val_lt (val_real r1) (val_real r2)
        (fun v => v = val_bool (r1 < r2))
  | evalbinop_ge : forall n1 n2,
      evalbinop val_ge (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_bool (n1 >= n2))
  | evalbinop_ger : forall r1 r2,
      evalbinop val_ge (val_real r1) (val_real r2)
        (fun v => v = val_bool (r1 >= r2))
  | evalbinop_gt : forall n1 n2,
      evalbinop val_gt (val_int n1) (val_int n2)
        (fun v => v = val_bool (n1 > n2))
  | evalbinop_gtr : forall r1 r2,
      evalbinop val_gt (val_real r1) (val_real r2)
        (fun v => v = val_bool (r1 > r2))

def hwand (H1 H2 : hProp) : hProp :=
  hexists (fun (H0 : hProp) => H0 ∗ hpure ((H1 ∗ H0) ==> H2))

def reducible (s : state) (t : trm) : Prop :=
  exists s' t', step s t s' t'

Finset.sum in Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Defs

Sigma in Init.Core

Lean.binderIdent in Init.Notation

@[simp]
def trms_vals (vs : List var) : List trm :=
  vs.map trm_var

scoped instance (priority := 1) EPCM : PartialCommMonoid val where
  valid := valid
  valid_add := by admit /- proof elided -/

Add in Init.Prelude

@[simp]
abbrev add : val -> val -> val
  | .val_bool i, .val_bool j => val.val_bool (i || j)
  | _, _ => val.val_unit

List.NodupKeys in Mathlib.Data.List.Sigma

Lean.Meta.isDefEq in Lean.Meta.Basic

def qwand {A} (Q1 Q2 : A → hProp) : hProp :=
  hforall (fun (x : A) => hwand (Q1 x) (Q2 x))

Lean.pp.universes in Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator.Options

@[simp]
def trms_to_vals (ts:List trm) : Option (List val) := do
  match ts with
  | [] => return []
  | (trm_val v) :: ts' => v :: (<- trms_to_vals ts')
  | _ => failure

Int.natAbs in Init.Data.Int.Basic

def wpgen_if_trm (F0 F1 F2 : formula) : formula :=
  wpgen_let F0 (fun v ↦ mkstruct (wpgen_if v F1 F2))

def make_list {A} (n : Nat) (v : A) : List A :=
  match n with
  | 0      => []
  | n' + 1 => v :: make_list n' v

tryGoal in Ssreflect.Utils

def trm_fixs (f:var) (xs:List var) (t:trm) : trm :=
  match xs with
  | [] => t
  | x1::xs' => trm_fix f x1 (trm_funs xs' t)

def st2 : state := ((Finmap.singleton 0 2).insert 2 2).insert 1 2

AList.keys in Mathlib.Data.List.AList

Finset.Icc in Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs

Set.InjOn in Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations

Lean.Name.cmp in Lean.Data.Name

macro "h∀" xs:Lean.explicitBinders ", " b:term : term => Lean.expandExplicitBinders ``hforall xs b

allGoal in Ssreflect.Utils

def hforall {A} (J : A → hProp) : hProp :=
  fun h => forall x, J x h

L in Archive.Hairer

abbrev formula := (val → hProp) → hProp

def wpgen_while (F1 F2 : formula) : formula := mkstruct fun Q =>
  h∀ R : formula,
    let F := wpgen_if_trm F1 (wpgen_seq F2 R) (wpgen_val val_unit)
    ⌜structural R ∧ F ===> R⌝ -∗ R Q

instance (α : Type) : HWand (α → hProp) (α → hProp) hProp where
  hWand := qwand

instance (priority := high) : AddCommMonoidWRT hProp hadd where
  addE := by admit /- proof elided -/

def default_get d := [lang|
  fun p i =>
    let n := val_abs i in
    let l := val_array_length p in
    let b := n < l in
    if b then
      val_array_get p n
    else
      d ]

Lean.Elab.Tactic.TacticM in Lean.Elab.Tactic.Basic

def val_funs (xs:List var) (t:trm) : val :=
  match xs with
  | [] => panic! "function with zero argumets!"
  | x1::xs' => val_fun x1 (trm_funs xs' t)

Lean.pp.fullNames in Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator.Options
</all_available_defs>

<all_available_lemmas>
lemma disjoint_update_not_r (h1 h2 : state) (x : loc) (v: val) :
  Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 →
  x ∉ h2 →
  Finmap.Disjoint (Finmap.insert x v h1) h2

lemma in_read_union_l (h1 h2 : state) (x : loc) :
  x ∈ h1 → read_state x (h1 ∪ h2) = read_state x h1

lemma disjoint_insert_l (h1 h2 : state) (x : loc) (v : val) :
  Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 →
  x ∈ h1 →
  Finmap.Disjoint (Finmap.insert x v h1) h2

lemma remove_not_in_r (h1 h2 : state) (p : loc) :
  p ∉ h2 →
  (h1 ∪ h2).erase p = h1.erase p ∪ h2

lemma erase_disjoint (h1 h2 : state) (p : loc) :
  h1.Disjoint h2 →
  (h1.erase p).Disjoint h2

theorem diff_non_mem (h₁ h₂ : state) :
  p ∈ h₂ → p ∉ h₁ \ h₂

lemma disjoint_disjoint_diff (h₁ h₂ h₃ : state) :
  h₁.Disjoint h₂ →
  (h₁ \ h₃).Disjoint h₂

lemma lookup_diff (h₁ h₂ : state) :
  p ∉ h₂ →
  (h₁ \ h₂).lookup p = h₁.lookup p

lemma lookup_diff_none (h₁ h₂ : state) :
  p ∈ h₂ →
  (h₁ \ h₂).lookup p = none

lemma union_diff_disjoint_r (h₁ h₂ h₃ : state) :
  h₂.Disjoint h₃ →
  (h₁ ∪ h₂) \ h₃ = (h₁ \ h₃) ∪ h₂

lemma hrange_of_conseq :
  (hrange L p) (conseq L p)

lemma val_int_congr :
  n1 = n2 →
  val.val_int n1 = val.val_int n2

lemma findIdx_spec' (arr : loc) (f : Int -> ℝ)
  (z n : ℤ) (_ : z <= n) (_ : 0 <= z) (N : ℕ) (_ : n <= N) :
  Set.InjOn f ⟦z, n⟧ ->
  i ∈ ⟦z, n⟧ ->
  { arr(arr, x in N => f x) }
  [ findIdx arr ⟨f i⟩ z n ]
  { v, ⌜ v = i ⌝ ∗ arr(arr, x in N => f x) }

lemma reinsert_erase_union (h1 h2 h3 : state) :
  h3.lookup p = some v →
  p ∉ h2 →
  h3.erase p = h1 ∪ h2 →
  h3 = (h1.insert p v) ∪ h2

lemma wp_seq t1 t2 Q :
  wp t1 (fun _ ↦ wp t2 Q) ==> wp (trm_seq t1 t2) Q

lemma xtriple_lemma t H (Q:val → hProp) :
  H ==> mkstruct (wpgen_app t) Q →
  triple t H Q

lemma int_index_eq {_ : Inhabited α} (L : List α) (i : Int) :
  L[i.natAbs]! = L[i]!

lemma hstar_pick_last_6 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 = h6 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5

lemma getElem!_nil_intint (n : Int) :
  ([] : List Int)[n]! = default

lemma hstar_pick_8 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 ∗ h = h8 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h

lemma trm_apps_app :
  trm_apps t1 (ts ++ ts') = trm_apps (trm_apps t1 ts) ts'

lemma dup_lemma (p : Prop) : p -> p -> p

lemma himpl_wpgen_wp t Q :
  wpgen t Q ==> wp t Q

lemma hstar_hforall A (J : A → hProp) H :
  (hforall J) ∗ H ==> hforall (J ∗ H)

lemma evalExact_sat :
  evalExact s t Q → ∃ v s, Q v s

lemma eval_app_arg1' s1 t1 t2 Q1 Q :
  eval s1 t1 Q1 ->
  (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 t2) Q) ->
  eval s1 (trm_app t1 t2) Q

lemma hforall_specialize A (x : A) (J : A → hProp) :
  (hforall J) ==> (J x)

lemma hstar_pick_2  :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h = h2 ∗ h1 ∗ h

lemma wp_conseq_frame t H (Q1 Q2 : val -> hProp) :
  Q1 ∗ H ===> Q2 →
  (wp t Q1) ∗ H ==> (wp t Q2)

lemma xwhile_inv_basic_lemmaQ (I : Bool -> α -> hProp) R:
  WellFounded R ->
  (H ==> H' ∗ ∃ʰ b a, I b a) ->
  (∀ b X, I b X ==> wp F1 (fun bv => I b X ∗ ⌜bv = b⌝)) ->
  (∀ X, I true X ==> wp F2 (fun _ => ∃ʰ b X', ⌜R X' X⌝ ∗ I b X')) ->
  ((fun _ => H' ∗ ∃ʰ a, I false a) ===> Q) ->
  H ==> wp (trm_while F1 F2) Q

lemma nth_middle (A : Type) (IA : Inhabited A) (n : Nat)
  (l1 l2 : List A) (x : A) :
  n = l1.length → (l1 ++ x :: l2)[n]! = x

lemma evalExact_frame (h1 h2 : state) t (Q : val → hProp) :
  evalExact h1 t (ofhProp Q) →
  Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 →
  evalExact (h1 ∪ h2) t (Q ∗ (tohProp (fun h ↦ h = h2)))

lemma non_mem_diff_helper1 (h₁ : state) (l : @AList loc fun _ ↦ val) :
  a ∉ l →
  p ∈ List.foldl (fun d s ↦ Finmap.erase s.fst d) (Finmap.erase a h₁) l.entries →
  p ≠ a

lemma hProp.disjoint_hstar (H₁ H₂ H₃ : hProp) :
  (H₃.Disjoint H₁ ∧ H₃.Disjoint H₂) -> H₃.Disjoint (H₁ ∗ H₂)

lemma himpl_hwand_r H1 H2 H3 :
  H2 ∗ H1 ==> H3 →
  H1 ==> (H2 -∗ H3)

lemma xpull_protect (h : H1 ==> protect H2) : H1 ==> H2

lemma wp_val v Q :
  Q v ==> wp (trm_val v) Q

lemma natabs_eq (a : Nat) :
  a = (Int.ofNat a).natAbs

lemma triple_array_length L (p : loc) :
  triple (trm_app val_array_length p)
    (harray L p)
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = val_int L.length⌝ ∗ harray L p)

lemma eval_like_trm_fun_val_fun_app_left (x : var) (t1 t2 : trm) :
  eval_like (trm_app (trm_fun x t1) t2) (trm_app (val_fun x t1) t2)

lemma xsimp_flip_acc_r_lemma :
  hra = hra' →
  XSimp (hla, emp, emp) (hra', hrg, emp) →
  XSimp (hla, emp, emp) (hra, hrg, emp)

lemma himpl_hforall_l A (x : A) (J : A → hProp) H :
  (J x ==> H) →
  (hforall J) ==> H

lemma eval_like_val_fun_trm_fun x t : eval_like (val_fun x t) (trm_fun x t)

lemma hstars_simp_keep_lemma :
  H1 ==> (H ∗ Ha) ∗ Ht →
  H1 ==> Ha ∗ H ∗ Ht

lemma xsimp_l_hempty :
  XSimp (hla, hlw, hlt) hr ->
  XSimp (hla, hlw, emp ∗ hlt) hr

lemma insert_same_eq (h1 h2 : state) :
  p ∉ h1 → p ∉ h2 →
  h1.insert p v = h2.insert p v →
  h1 = h2

lemma xfun_spec_lemma (S:val->Prop) H Q Fof :
  (forall (vf : val),
    (forall (vx : val) H' Q', (H' ==> Fof vx Q') → triple (trm_app vf vx) H' Q') →
    S vf) →
  (forall vf, S vf -> (H ==> Q vf)) →
  H ==> wpgen_fun Fof Q

lemma List.kerase_noterased {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [DecidableEq α] (l : List (Sigma β))
  (a a' : α) (hneq : a ≠ a') (b : β a) : ⟨a, b⟩ ∈ l ↔ ⟨a, b⟩ ∈ List.kerase a' l

lemma hstar_pick_5 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h = h5 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h

lemma triple_array_get_hcell (p : loc) (i : Int) (v : val) :
  triple [lang| val_array_get p i]
    (hcell v p i)
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = v⌝ ∗ hcell v p i)

@[ext]
lemma hProp.ext (H1 H2 : hProp) :
  (∀ h, H1 h ↔ H2 h) → H1 = H2

lemma hstar_hpure_r P H h :
  (H ∗ ⌜P⌝) h = (H h ∧ P)

lemma xsimpl_lr_cancel_same_hsingle :
  XSimp (Hla, Hlw, Hlt) (Hra, Hrg, Hrt) →
  v1 = v2 →
  XSimp (p ~~> v1 ∗ Hla, Hlw, Hlt) (Hra, Hrg, p ~~> v2 ∗ Hrt)

lemma hseg_nil p j :
  hseg [] p j = emp

lemma mkstruct_erase Q F :
  F Q ==> mkstruct F Q

lemma ofnat_plusone (n : Nat) :
  Int.ofNat (n + 1) = (Int.ofNat n) + 1

lemma mkstruct_frame F H Q :
  (mkstruct F Q) ∗ H ==> mkstruct F (Q ∗ H)

lemma hstar_htop_htop :
  ⊤ ∗ ⊤ = ⊤

lemma of_nat_nat n :
  OfNat.ofNat n = n

lemma hProp.disjoint_sum (H : hProp) (fs : Finset β) :
  (∀ i ∈ fs, H.Disjoint (H' i)) ->
    H.Disjoint (fs.sum H')

lemma mkstruct_sound t F :
  formula_sound t F →
  formula_sound t (mkstruct F)

lemma hwand_hempty_l H :
  (emp -∗ H) = H

lemma intersect_comm (s2 d : state) (a₁ : loc) (b₁ : val) (a₂ : loc) (b₂ : val) :
  (fun s x _ ↦ if x ∈ s2 then s else Finmap.erase x s)
      ((fun s x _ ↦ if x ∈ s2 then s else Finmap.erase x s) d a₁ b₁) a₂ b₂ =
    (fun s x _ ↦ if x ∈ s2 then s else Finmap.erase x s)
      ((fun s x _ ↦ if x ∈ s2 then s else Finmap.erase x s) d a₂ b₂) a₁ b₁

@[simp]
lemma validLocE : validLoc (val := val) l h = False

lemma sum_Ico_succlr {_ : AddCommMonoid M} (f : Int -> M) (i j : Int) :
  ∑ i in ⟦i, j⟧, f (i+1) = ∑ i in ⟦i+1, j+1⟧, f i

lemma hempty_eq_hpure_true :
  emp = ⌜True⌝

@[heapSimp]
lemma foo' : (@OfNat.ofNat ℤ n _) = (n : ℤ)

lemma intersect_disjoint_cancel (s₁ s₂ s₃ : state) :
  s₁.Disjoint s₃ →
  (s₁ ∪ intersect s₂ s₃) \ s₃ = s₁

lemma kmerge_mem2 (l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma (fun _ : loc => val))) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys) -- necessary
    (a : Sigma (fun _ : loc => val)) : a ∈ (kmerge l₁ l₂) ↔
      if a.1 ∈ l₁.keys
      then (if a.1 ∈ l₂.keys then Option.merge (· + ·) (l₁.dlookup a.1) (l₂.dlookup a.1) = .some a.2 else a ∈ l₁)
      else a ∈ l₂

lemma wp_eval_like t1 t2 Q :
  eval_like t1 t2 →
  wp t1 Q ==> wp t2 Q

lemma eval_app_arg2' : forall s1 (v1 : val) t2 Q1 Q,
  eval s1 t2 Q1 ->
  (forall v2 s2, eval s2 (trm_app v1 v2) Q) ->
  eval s1 (trm_app v1 t2) Q

lemma himpl_hexists_l A H (J : A → hProp) :
  (forall x, J x ==> H) → (hexists J) ==> H

lemma evalExact_frame_get :
  s.Disjoint h2 →
  p ∈ s →
  evalExact (s ∪ h2) t (fun v' s' ↦ v' = read_state p (s ∪ h2) ∧ s' = s ∪ h2 ) →
  evalExact (s ∪ h2) t
    (qstar (fun v' s' ↦ v' = read_state p s ∧ s' = s) (tohProp fun h ↦ h = h2))

@[simp]
lemma Heap.add_mem (h₁ h₂ : heap) : (l ∈  h₁ +ʰ h₂) = (l ∈ h₁ ∨ l ∈ h₂)

lemma triple_of_wpgen t H Q :
  H ==> wpgen t Q →
  triple t H Q

lemma insert_eq_union_single (h : state) :
  p ∉ h →
  h.insert p v = h ∪ (Finmap.singleton p v)

lemma hstars_simp_start_lemma :
  H1 ∗ emp ==> emp ∗ H2 ∗ emp →
  H1 ==> H2

lemma isubst_single x v t : isubst (List.mkAlist [x] [v]) t = subst x v t

lemma sum_disjoint_hstar (H : β -> hProp) (fs : Finset β) [inst : PartialCommMonoid val] :
  (∀ᵉ (i ∈ fs) (j ∈ fs), i ≠ j -> (H i).Disjoint (H j)) ->
  (∑ b in fs, H b) =
  (@Finset.sum β hProp (@instAddCommMonoidHPropOfPartialCommMonoidVal (PartialCommMonoidWRT.toPartialCommMonoid add valid)) fs H)

lemma list_cons_length (A : Type) (x : A) (L : List A) :
  (x :: L).length = 1 + L.length

lemma xsimp_lr_cancel_same :
  XSimp (hla, hlw, hlt) (hra, hrg, hrt) ->
  XSimp (h ∗ hla, hlw, hlt) (hra, hrg, h ∗ hrt)

lemma himpl_hgc_r : forall H,
  haffine H →
  H ==> /GC

@[simp]
lemma Heap.add_empty_l (h : heap) : ∅ +ʰ h = h

lemma haffine_hexists A (J : A → hProp) :
  (forall x, haffine (J x)) →
  haffine (hexists J)

lemma xsimp_l_acc_other :
  XSimp (h ∗ hla, hlw, hlt) hr ->
  XSimp (hla, hlw, h ∗ hlt) hr

lemma hseg_cons v p j L :
  hseg (v :: L) p j = hcell v p j ∗ hseg L p (j + 1)

lemma hstar_hgc_hgc : /GC ∗ /GC = /GC

@[simp]
lemma himpl_refl_resolve  H : (H ==> H) = True

lemma himpl_hempty_hwand_same H :
  emp ==> (H -∗ H)

lemma triple_arrayFun_length (p : loc) :
  triple (trm_app val_array_length p)
    (harrayFun f n p)
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = val_int n⌝ ∗ harrayFun f n p)

@[simp]
lemma Heap.add_lookup (h₁ h₂ : heap) (l : loc) :
  (h₁ +ʰ h₂).lookup l = Option.merge (·+·) (h₁.lookup l) (h₂.lookup l)

lemma xwhile_inv_basic_lemma (I : Bool -> α -> hProp) R
  -- (F1 F2 : formula)
  :
  WellFounded R ->
  -- structural F1 ->
  -- structural F2 ->
  (H ==> H' ∗ ∃ʰ b a, I b a) ->
  (∀ b X, I b X ==> wp F1 (fun bv => I b X ∗ ⌜bv = b⌝)) ->
  (∀ X, I true X ==> wp F2 (fun _ => ∃ʰ b X', ⌜R X' X⌝ ∗ I b X')) ->
  H ==> wp (trm_while F1 F2) (fun _ => H' ∗ ∃ʰ a, I false a)

lemma AList.erase_insert_swap {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [DecidableEq α] (a a' : α) (b : β a) (l : AList β) :
  a ≠ a' → (AList.erase a' (AList.insert a b l)).entries.Perm (AList.insert a b (AList.erase a' l)).entries

lemma validInter_assoc_r (h₁ h₂ h₃ : heap) :
  h₂ ⊥ʰ h₃ -> h₁ ⊥ʰ (h₂ +ʰ h₃) -> (h₁ +ʰ h₂) ⊥ʰ h₃

lemma hstar_flip_7 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ emp =
  h7 ∗ h6 ∗ h5 ∗ h4 ∗ h3 ∗ h2 ∗ h1 ∗ emp

lemma insert_union (h1 h2 : state) (p : loc) (v : val) :
  p ∉ h1 ∪ h2 →
  (h1 ∪ h2).insert p v = (h1.insert p v) ∪ h2

lemma mem_diff_rev_helper (h₁ : state) (l : @AList loc fun _ ↦ val) :
  a ∉ l →
  (p ∈ h₁ ∧ p ∉ l.toFinmap → p ∈ List.foldl (fun d s ↦ Finmap.erase s.fst d) h₁ l.entries) →
  p ∈ h₁ ∧ p ∉ (AList.insert a b l).toFinmap →
  p ∈ List.foldl (fun d s ↦ Finmap.erase s.fst d) (Finmap.erase a h₁) l.entries

@[simp]
lemma Heap.add_union_validInter (h₁ h₂ : Heap.heap val) {h : h₁ ⊥ʰ h₂} :
  h₁ +ʰ h₂ = h₁ ∪ h₂

lemma htop_intro h :
  ⊤ h

lemma xwp_lemma_funs (xs : List _) (vs : List val) :
  t = trm_apps v0 ts ->
  v0 = val_funs xs t1 ->
  trms_to_vals ts = vs ->
  var_funs xs vs.length ->
  H ==> wpgen (isubst (xs.mkAlist vs) t1) Q ->
  triple t H Q

lemma hstar_pick_3 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h = h3 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h

lemma sum_Ico_succl {_ : AddCommMonoid M} (f : Int -> M) (i j : Int) :
  i < j ->
  ∑ i in ⟦i, j⟧, f i = f i + ∑ i in ⟦i+1, j⟧, f i

lemma cons_app {A : Type} (l1 l2 : List A) (x : A) :
  x :: l1 ++ l2 = x :: (l1 ++ l2)

lemma wp_of_wpgen :
  H ==> wpgen t Q →
  H ==> wp t Q

lemma hwandE :
  H1 -∗ H2 = hexists (fun H0 => H0 ∗ hpure ((H1 ∗ H0) ==> H2))

lemma hstar_flip_6 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ emp =
  h6 ∗ h5 ∗ h4 ∗ h3 ∗ h2 ∗ h1 ∗ emp

lemma finite_state' n (s : state) :
  ∃ p, p ≠ null ∧
    Finmap.Disjoint s (conseq (make_list n val_uninit) p)

lemma remove_not_in_l (h1 h2 : state) (p : loc) :
  p ∉ h1 →
  (h1 ∪ h2).erase p = h1 ∪ h2.erase p

lemma wpgen_fun_sound x t1 Fof :
  (forall vx, formula_sound (subst x vx t1) (Fof vx)) →
  formula_sound (trm_fun x t1) (wpgen_fun Fof)

lemma hstar_pick_4 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h = h4 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h

lemma himpl_of_eq H1 H2 : H1 = H2 -> H1 ==> H2

lemma xsimp_pick_lemma :
  hla2 = hla1 ->
  XSimp (hla1, hlw, hlt) hr ->
  XSimp (hla2, hlw, hlt) hr

lemma hexists_intro A (x : A) (J : A → hProp) h :
  J x h → (hexists J) h

lemma xstruct_lemma F H Q :
  H ==> F Q →
  H ==> mkstruct F Q

lemma eval_divr s r1 r2 Q :
  r2 ≠ 0 ->
  Q (val_real (r1 / r2)) s ->
  eval s (trm_app (trm_app val_div (val_real r1)) (val_real r2)) Q

lemma himpl_frame_l H1 H1' H2 :
  H1 ==> H1' →
  (H1 ∗ H2) ==> (H1' ∗ H2)

lemma hpure_inv P h :
  ⌜P⌝ h →
  P ∧ h = ∅

lemma hadd_single (v v' : ℝ) :
  (p ~~> val.val_real v) + (p ~~> val.val_real v') = p ~~> val.val_real (v + v')

lemma eval_like_trm_apps_funs (heqv0 : v0 = trm_funs xs t1) :
  eval_like (isubst (xs.mkAlist vs) t1) (trm_apps (val_funs xs t1) ts)

@[simp]
lemma labSet_mem :
  x ∈ ⟪l, s⟫ ↔ x.lab = l ∧ x.val ∈ s

lemma xsimp_r_keep :
  XSimp hl (h ∗ hra, hrg, hrt) ->
  XSimp hl (hra, hrg, h ∗ hrt)

lemma hstar_pick_6 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h = h6 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h

lemma wp_let x t1 t2 Q :
  wp t1 (fun v ↦ wp (subst x v t2) Q) ==> wp (trm_let x t1 t2) Q

lemma xsimp_l_acc_wand :
  XSimp (hla, h ∗ hlw, hlt) hr ->
  XSimp (hla, hlw, h ∗ hlt) hr

lemma hwand_inv h1 h2 H1 H2 :
  (H1 -∗ H2) h2 →
  H1 h1 →
  Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 →
  H2 (h1 ∪ h2)

lemma wp_app_fun x v1 v2 t1 Q :
  v1 = val_fun x t1 →
  wp (subst x v2 t1) Q ==> wp (trm_app v1 v2) Q

lemma trm_apps2 :
  trm_apps (trm_app t1 t2) ts = trm_apps t1 (t2::ts)

lemma wp_ramified t (Q1 Q2 : val -> hProp) :
  (wp t Q1) ∗ (Q1 -∗ Q2) ==> (wp t Q2)

lemma xsimpl_lr_cancel_htop :
  XSimp (Hla, Hlw, Hlt) (Hra, (⊤ ∗ Hrg), Hrt) ->
  XSimp ((H ∗ Hla), Hlw, Hlt) (Hra, (⊤ ∗ Hrg), Hrt)

lemma mkstruct_ramified Q1 Q2 F :
  (mkstruct F Q1) ∗ (Q1 -∗ Q2) ==> (mkstruct F Q2)

lemma wp_fix f x t Q :
  Q (val_fix f x t) ==> wp (trm_fix f x t) Q

lemma validInter_disjoint (h₁ h₂ : Heap.heap val) :
  h₁ ⊥ʰ h₂ = h₁.Disjoint h₂

lemma validInter_comm (h₁ h₂ : heap) :
  h₁ ⊥ʰ h₂ = h₂ ⊥ʰ h₁

lemma union_singleton_eq_insert (h : state) :
  Finmap.singleton p v ∪ h = h.insert p v

lemma qwandE α (Q1 Q2 : α → hProp) :
  Q1 -∗ Q2 = hforall (fun x => (Q1 x) -∗ (Q2 x))

lemma mem_conseq :
  x ∈ conseq L p → p ≤ x

@[simp]
lemma labSet_diff (l : ℕ) (s s' : Set α) :
   ⟪l, s⟫ \ ⟪l, s'⟫ = ⟪l, s \ s'⟫

lemma isubst_perm {al al'} t (hp : al.entries.Perm al'.entries) :
  isubst al t = isubst al' t

lemma haffine_hstar H1 H2 :
  haffine H1 → haffine H2 → haffine (H1 ∗ H2)

lemma qimpl_refl (Q : α -> hProp) : Q ===> Q

lemma union_monotone_r (s₃ s₁ s₂ : state) :
  s₁ = s₂ →
  s₁ ∪ s₃ = s₂ ∪ s₃

lemma xsimp_flip_acc_l_lemma :
  hla = hla' →
  XSimp (hla', emp, emp) (hra, hrg, emp) →
  XSimp (hla, emp, emp) (hra, hrg, emp)

@[simp]
lemma star_post_empty (Q : α -> hProp) :
  Q ∗ emp = Q

lemma hstar_pick_last_1 :
  h1 = h1

lemma xsimp_l_cancel_hwand_hstar :
  XSimp (Hla, Hlw, (H2 -∗ H3) ∗ Hlt) HR →
  XSimp ((H1 ∗ Hla), (((H1 ∗ H2) -∗ H3) ∗ Hlw), Hlt) HR

@[disjE]
lemma disjoint_label_set :
  Disjoint ⟪l,s⟫ ⟪l',s'⟫ ↔ l ≠ l' ∨ Disjoint s s'

lemma xref_lemma x v t2 H Q :
  H ==> (h∀ p, (p ~~> v) -∗
    protect (wp (subst x p t2) (fun hv ↦ Q hv ∗ ∃ʰ u, p ~~> u))) →
  H ==> wpgen_ref x (trm_val v) t2 Q

lemma hpure_intro P :
  P → ⌜P⌝  ∅

lemma xsimp_l_cancel_qwand α (Q1 Q2 : α -> hProp) x :
  XSimp (emp, Hlw, (Hla ∗ Q2 x ∗ Hlt)) HR ->
  XSimp ((Q1 x ∗ Hla), ((Q1 -∗ Q2) ∗ Hlw), Hlt) HR

@[simp]
theorem mem_diff_iff (h₁ h₂ : state) :
  p ∈ h₁ \ h₂ ↔ p ∈ h₁ ∧ p ∉ h₂

lemma wpgen_alloc_sound x t1 t2 :
  formula_sound (trm_alloc x t1 t2) (wpgen_alloc x t1 t2)

lemma diff_insert_intersect_id (s₁ s₂ : state) :
  (s₁ \ s₂) ∪ (intersect s₁ s₂) = s₁

lemma exact_imp_eval :
  evalExact s t Q → eval s t Q

lemma lookup_intersect (s₁ s₂ : state) :
  p ∈ s₁ ∧ p ∈ s₂ →
  (intersect s₁ s₂).lookup p = s₁.lookup p

lemma hstars_simp_cancel_lemma :
  H1 ==> Ha ∗ Ht →
  H ∗ H1 ==> Ha ∗ H ∗ Ht

lemma hstar_pick_9 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 ∗ h9 ∗ h = h9 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 ∗ h

lemma eval_addr s r1 r2 Q :
  Q (val_real (r1 + r2)) s →
  eval s (trm_app (trm_app val_add (val_real r1)) (val_real r2)) Q

lemma haffine_hforall A {_ : Inhabited A} (J : A → hProp) :
  (forall x, haffine (J x)) →
  haffine (hforall J)

lemma List.mkAlist_snoc_to_cons [DecidableEq α] (xs : List α) (vs : List β)
    (x : α) (v : β) : x ∉ xs → xs.length = vs.length → xs.Nodup →
    ((xs ++ [x]).mkAlist (vs ++ [v])).entries.Perm (((x :: xs).mkAlist (v :: vs)).entries)
</all_available_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Data.Finmap

import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic

import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Nodup

import SPLean.Common.State

import SPLean.Common.Util

import SPLean.Theories.HProp

import SPLean.Theories.XSimp

open trm val prim

notation "funloc" p "↦" H =>
  fun (r : val) ↦ hexists (fun p ↦ ⌜r = val_loc p⌝ ∗ H)

section evalProp

abbrev tohProp (h : heap -> Prop) : hProp := h

abbrev ofhProp (h : val -> hProp) : val -> heap -> Prop := h
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma eval_frame (h1 h2 : state) t (Q : val -> hProp) :
  eval h1 t (ofhProp Q) →
  Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 →
  eval (h1 ∪ h2) t (Q ∗ (tohProp (fun h ↦ h = h2))) :=
</target_theorem>

