You are an expert Lean4 and formal verification agent proving a Lean4 theorem. Your output **must** strictly adhere to the specified format.

### Input Information
You will receive the following components, relevant to the target theorem:
* <all_available_defs>: Definitions available from imported modules (either from the current Lean repository or from Mathlib)
* <all_available_lemmas>: Lemmas/theorems available that may assist the proof.
* <local_ctx>...</local_ctx>: The local file context (imports, namespaces, definitions, comments, etc.) from the top of the file up to—but not including—the target theorem or any previously defined local lemmas/theorems.
* <target_theorem>...</target_theorem>: The target theorem statement, ending with `:=`.

**Notes**
1. Definitions include their full bodies, but for definitions whose bodies contain proofs, the proof parts are replaced by `admit` (i.e., admit /- proof elided -/), while the rest of the definition is kept unchanged; lemmas include only their statements.
2. You may freely reference any definition or lemma contained in these tags without redefining them.
3. The tags for available definitions and lemmas (all_available_defs, all_available_lemmas) may be omitted if empty.

### Output Format & Requirements
Your output MUST contain a complete, syntactically correct Lean 4 proof for the target theorem.

**Strict Output Structure:**
<reasoning> 
...
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
-- each lemma is a full Lean 4 declaration with a complete proof
...
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
-- Lean 4 proof body of the target theorem
...
</lean4_proof>

**Requirements:**
1. <reasoning> and <lean4_invented_lemmas> are OPTIONAL. Include them only if they aid proof construction.
2. <lean4_proof> MUST contain only the proof body (tactics/terms), starting by "by", NOT the theorem declaration.
3. <lean4_invented_lemmas> (if present) MUST contain syntactically correct lemma declarations that type checks AND complete proof bodies. Defining a lemma using `axiom` is NOT allowed.
4. <reasoning> contains high-level proof planning.
5. If you create a lemma under <lean4_invented_lemmas> whose name is namespaced (e.g., X.Y.Z), you MUST always refer to it using its fully qualified name. Do NOT rely on shortened names. For example, write rw [X.Y.Z], not rw [Z] for invented lemmas.
6. All Lean 4 code MUST be syntactically correct. No `sorry`, `admit`, or non-Lean text. Comments allowed using `--` or `/- ... -/`.
7. Follow the tags and structure EXACTLY. No extra text before, between, or after the sections.
8. Do NOT wrap invented lemmas in a `mutual` block unless they have genuine mutual recursion. Declare each lemma independently.

### Examples are provided here (example input are under "User Prompt", and example assistant response are under "Agent Response"):
Example 1 ------------------- 
User Prompt:
<all_available_defs>
structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
  /-- Construct a `BitVec w` from a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  ofFin ::

  /-- Interpret a bitvector as a number less than `2^w`.
  O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
  toFin : Fin (hPow 2 w)
</all_available_defs>

<all_available_lemmas>
theorem List.getElem_append_left{α : Type u_1} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {i : Nat} (hn : i < l₁.length) : (l₁ ++ l₂)[i] = l₁[i]
theorem getElem_eq_testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (h : i < w) :
  x[i] = x.toNat.testBit i := rfl
@[simp, grind =] theorem toNat_cons (b : Bool) (x : BitVec w) :
    (cons b x).toNat = (b.toNat <<< w) ||| x.toNat
@[simp, grind =] theorem getLsbD_of_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : w ≤ i) : getLsbD x i = false
theorem testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) : x.toNat.testBit i = x.getLsbD i
</all_available_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Mathlib.Computability.NFA
import Mathlib.Data.FinEnum
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Blase.AutoStructs.ForLean

open Set
open Mathlib
open SetRel

-- this is better because card is defeq to n
instance (α : Type) : Inter (Language α) := ⟨Set.inter⟩
instance (α : Type) : Union (Language α) := ⟨Set.union⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width.
-/
structure BitVecs (n : Nat) where
  w : Nat
  bvs : List.Vector (BitVec w) n

def BitVecs.cast (bvs : BitVecs n) (h : n = n') : BitVecs n' :=
  { w := bvs.w, bvs := h ▸ bvs.bvs }

abbrev BitVecs.empty : BitVecs n := ⟨0, List.Vector.replicate n .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.singleton {w : Nat} (bv : BitVec w) : BitVecs 1 := ⟨w, bv ::ᵥ .nil⟩
abbrev BitVecs.pair {w : Nat} (bv1 bv2 : BitVec w) : BitVecs 2 := ⟨w, bv1 ::ᵥ bv2 ::ᵥ .nil⟩

/--
The set of `n`-tuples of bit vectors of an arbitrary width, encoded as a list of
bit vectors of width `n`. The width of the encoded bit vectors is the length of
the list.
-/
abbrev BitVecs' (n : Nat) := List (BitVec n)

@[simps]
def dec (bvs' : BitVecs' n) : BitVecs n where
  w := bvs'.length
  bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k => BitVec.ofFn fun i => bvs'[i].getLsbD k

@[simp]
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma dec_snoc n (bvs' : BitVecs' n) (a : BitVec n) :
  dec (bvs' ++ [a]) =
    { w := bvs'.length + 1
      bvs := List.Vector.ofFn fun k =>
        BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k) } :=
</target_theorem>

Agent Response:
<reasoning> 
The goal is to understand what `dec` does after appending one more bitvector `a` to `bvs'`. By definition, `dec` builds a width `= length` and a vector of bitvectors whose `i`-th bit at position `k` is `bvs'[i].getLsbD k`. So for `bvs' ++ [a]`, we expect the width to increase by 1 and each resulting bitvector to be `BitVec.cons` of the new bit coming from `a`.

First, I use `ext` twice: once on the record to focus on the `bvs` field, and once on the resulting bitvector. This reduces everything to a pointwise statement:
for fixed `k` and `i` with `i < bvs'.length + 1`,
the bit `(bvs' ++ [a])[i].getLsbD k` should match the bit at index `i` of `BitVec.cons (a.getLsbD k) ((dec bvs').bvs.get k)`.

At this point I need a clean description of indexing into `BitVec.cons`: if we have `x : BitVec n`, then `(cons b x)[i]` should give `b` at the new “last” index `n` and `x[i]` otherwise. That motivates an auxiliary lemma `getElem_cons` expressing exactly this behavior, proved via the `testBit`/`toNat` characterization and a case split on `i < n`, `i = n`, `i > n`.

Using `getElem_cons`, the RHS becomes an `if` on whether `i = bvs'.length`. So I split into cases:
- If `i = bvs'.length`, then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i]` is the appended `a`, so both sides reduce to `a.getLsbD k`.
- If `i ≠ bvs'.length`, the bound `i < bvs'.length + 1` forces `i < bvs'.length`. Then `(bvs' ++ [a])[i] = bvs'[i]` by `List.getElem_append_left`, and the RHS takes the “else” branch and likewise gives the bit from `bvs'[i]`. In both subcases, `simp` (plus the definition of `dec`) finishes.

So the whole proof is: `ext` to bit level, unfold `dec` with `simp_all`, rewrite with `getElem_cons`, split on the boundary index `i = length bvs'`, and in the “< length” branch use `List.getElem_append_left` and bounds to line up both sides.
</reasoning> 

<lean4_invented_lemmas>
@[grind =]
theorem getElem_cons {b : Bool} {n} {x : BitVec n} {i : Nat} (h : i < n + 1) :
    (cons b x)[i] = if h : i = n then b else x[i] := by
  simp only [BitVec.getElem_eq_testBit_toNat, BitVec.toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
  rw [Nat.testBit_shiftLeft]
  rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i n with i_lt_n | i_eq_n | n_lt_i
  · have p1 : ¬(n ≤ i) := by omega
    have p2 : i ≠ n := by omega
    simp [p1, p2]
  · simp only [i_eq_n, ge_iff_le, Nat.le_refl, decide_true, Nat.sub_self, Nat.testBit_zero,
    Bool.true_and, BitVec.testBit_toNat, BitVec.getLsbD_of_ge, Bool.or_false]
    cases b <;> trivial
  · have p1 : i ≠ n := by omega
    have p2 : i - n ≠ 0 := by omega
    simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_toNat]
</lean4_invented_lemmas>

<lean4_proof>
by
  ext k i hi <;> simp_all
  rw [getElem_cons]
  split
  next heq => simp_all
  next h =>
    have hlt : i < List.length bvs' := by simp at hi; omega
    rw [List.getElem_append_left hlt]
    simp
</lean4_proof>

### Your task:
<all_available_defs>
def hProp := heap -> Prop

abbrev himpl (H1 H2 : hProp) : Prop :=
  forall h, H1 h -> H2 h

def qimpl {A} (Q1 Q2 : A → hProp) : Prop :=
  forall (v:A), Q1 v ==> Q2 v

def hempty : hProp :=
  fun h => (h = ∅)

def hexists {A} (J : A → hProp) : hProp :=
  fun h => exists x, J x h

def hforall {A} (J : A → hProp) : hProp :=
  fun h => forall x, J x h

class HStar (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   
  hStar : α → β → γ

def hpure (P : Prop) : hProp :=
  hexists (fun (_ : P) => emp)

class HWand (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   
  hWand : α → β → γ

abbrev loc := Nat

abbrev var := String

abbrev Heap.heap (val : Type) := Finmap (λ _ : loc ↦ val)

abbrev tohProp (h : heap -> Prop) : hProp := h

abbrev ofhProp (h : val -> hProp) : val -> heap -> Prop := h

inductive prim where
  
  | val_get : prim
  | val_set : prim
  
  | val_neg : prim
  | val_opp : prim
  | val_eq : prim
  | val_add : prim
  | val_neq : prim
  | val_sub : prim
  | val_mul : prim
  | val_div : prim
  | val_mod : prim
  
  | val_le : prim
  | val_lt : prim
  | val_ge : prim
  | val_gt : prim
  | val_ptr_add : prim

inductive val : Type where
    | val_unit   : val
    | val_bool   : Bool → val
    | val_int    : Int → val
    | val_real   : ℝ → val
    | val_loc    : loc → val
    | val_prim   : prim → val
    | val_fun    : var -> trm -> val
    | val_fix    : var -> var -> trm -> val
    | val_uninit : val
    | val_error : val

inductive trm : Type where
    | trm_val   : val -> trm
    | trm_var   : var -> trm
    | trm_fun   : var -> trm -> trm
    | trm_fix   : var -> var -> trm -> trm
    | trm_app   : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_seq   : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_let   : var -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_if    : trm -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_for   : var -> trm -> trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_while : trm -> trm -> trm
    | trm_ref   : var → trm → trm → trm
    | trm_alloc : var → trm → trm → trm

abbrev state := Finmap (λ _ : loc ↦ val)

abbrev heap := Heap.heap val

def subst (y : var) (v' : val) (t : trm) : trm :=
  
  let if_y_eq x t1 t2 := if x = y then t1 else t2
  match t with
  | trm_val v          => trm_val v
  | trm_var x          => if_y_eq x (trm_val v') t
  | trm_fun x t1       => trm_fun x (if_y_eq x t1 (subst y v' t1))
  | trm_fix f x t1     => trm_fix f x (if_y_eq f t1 (if_y_eq x t1 (subst y v' t1)))
  | trm_app t1 t2      => trm_app (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2)
  | trm_seq t1 t2      => trm_seq (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2)
  | trm_let x t1 t2    => trm_let x (subst y v' t1) (if_y_eq x t2 (subst y v' t2))
  | trm_if t0 t1 t2    => trm_if (subst y v' t0) (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2)
  | trm_for x t1 t2 t3 => trm_for x (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2) (if_y_eq x t3 (subst y v' t3))
  | trm_while t1 t2    => trm_while (subst y v' t1) (subst y v' t2)
  | trm_ref x t1 t2    => trm_ref x (subst y v' t1) (if_y_eq x t2 (subst y v' t2))
  | trm_alloc x t1 t2  => trm_alloc x (subst y v' t1) (if_y_eq x t2 (subst y v' t2))

inductive step : state → trm → state → trm → Prop where

| step_seq_ctx : forall s1 s2 t1 t1' t2,
      step s1 t1 s2 t1' →
      step s1 (trm_seq t1 t2) s2 (trm_seq t1' t2)
  | step_let_ctx : forall s1 s2 x t1 t1' t2,
      step s1 t1 s2 t1' →
      step s1 (trm_let x t1 t2) s2 (trm_let x t1' t2)
  | step_app_arg_1 : forall s1 s2 t1 t1' t2,
      step s1 t1 s2 t1' →
      step s1 (trm_app t1 t2) s2 (trm_app t1' t2)
  | step_app_arg2 : forall s1 s2 v1 t2 t2',
      step s1 t2 s2 t2' →
      step s1 (trm_app v1 t2) s2 (trm_app v1 t2')

| step_fun : forall s x t1,
      step s (trm_fun x t1) s (val_fun x t1)
  | step_fix : forall s f x t1,
      step s (trm_fix f x t1) s (val_fix f x t1)
  | step_app_fun : forall s v1 v2 x t1,
      v1 = val_fun x t1 →
      v2 = trm_val v2' →
      step s (trm_app v1 v2) s (subst x v2' t1)
  | step_app_fix : forall s v1 v2 f x t1,
      v1 = val_fix f x t1 →
      v2 = trm_val v2' →
      step s (trm_app v1 v2) s (subst x v2' (subst f v1 t1))
  | step_if : forall s b t1 t2,
      step s (trm_if (val_bool b) t1 t2) s (if b then t1 else t2)
  | step_seq : forall s t2 v1,
      step s (trm_seq v1 t2) s t2
  | step_let : forall s x t2 v1,
      v1 = trm_val v1' →
      step s (trm_let x v1 t2) s (subst x v1' t2)

| step_neg : forall s b,
      step s (trm_app val_neg (val_bool b)) s (val_bool (¬ b))
  | step_opp : forall s n,
      step s (trm_app val_opp (val_int n)) s (val_int (- n))

| step_eq : forall s v1 v2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_eq v1) v2) s (val_bool (is_true (v1 = v2)))
  | step_neq : forall s v1 v2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_neq v1) v2) s (val_bool (is_true (v1 ≠ v2)))
  | step_add : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_add (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_int (n1 + n2))
  | step_sub : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_sub (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_int (n1 - n2))
  | step_mul : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_mul (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_int (n1 * n2))
  | step_div : forall s n1 n2,
      n2 ≠ 0 →
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_div (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (n1 / n2)
  | step_mod : forall s n1 n2,
      n2 ≠ 0 →
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_mod (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (n1 % n2)
  | step_le : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_le (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_bool (n1 <= n2))
  | step_lt : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_lt (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_bool (n1 < n2))
  | step_ge : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_ge (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_bool (n1 >= n2))
  | step_gt : forall s n1 n2,
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_gt (val_int n1)) (val_int n2)) s
        (val_bool (n1 > n2))
  | step_ptr_add : forall s p1 p2 n,
      (p2:ℤ) = (p1:loc) + n →
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_ptr_add (val_loc p1)) (val_int n)) s
        (val_loc (Int.toNat p2))

| step_ref : forall s v p,
      ¬ p ∈ s →
      v = trm_val v' →
      step s (trm_app val_ref v) (Finmap.insert p v' s) (val_loc p)
  | step_get : forall s p,
      p ∈ s →
      step s (trm_app val_get (val_loc p)) s (read_state p s)
  | step_set : forall s p v,
      p ∈ s ->
      v = trm_val v' →
      step s (trm_app (trm_app val_set (val_loc p)) v)
        (Finmap.insert p v' s) val_unit
  | step_free : forall s p,
      p ∈ s →
      step s (trm_app val_free (val_loc p)) (Finmap.erase p s) val_unit

def purepostin (s : state) (P : val → Prop) (Q : val → state → Prop) : Prop :=
  
  forall v, P v → Q v s

inductive eval : state → trm → (val → state → Prop) -> Prop where
  | eval_val : forall s v Q,
      Q v s ->
      eval s (trm_val v) Q
  | eval_fun : forall s x t1 Q,
      Q (val_fun x t1) s ->
      eval s (trm_fun x t1) Q
  | eval_fix : forall s f x t1 Q,
      Q (val_fix f x t1) s ->
      eval s (trm_fix f x t1) Q
  | eval_app_arg1 : forall s1 t1 t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t1 ->
      eval s1 t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 t2) Q) ->
      eval s1 (trm_app t1 t2) Q
  | eval_app_arg2 : forall s1 (v1 : val) t2 Q1 Q,
      ¬ trm_is_val t2 ->
      eval s1 t2 Q1 ->
      (forall v2 s2, Q1 v2 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 v2) Q) ->
      eval s1 (trm_app v1 t2) Q
  | eval_app_fun : forall s1 v1 (v2 :val) x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fun x t1 ->
      eval s1 (subst x v2 t1) Q ->
      eval s1 (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | eval_app_fix : forall s (v1 v2 : val) f x t1 Q,
      v1 = val_fix f x t1 ->
      eval s (subst x v2 (subst f v1 t1)) Q ->
      eval s (trm_app v1 v2) Q
  | eval_seq : forall Q1 s t1 t2 Q,
      eval s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 t2 Q) ->
      eval s (trm_seq t1 t2) Q
  | eval_let : forall Q1 s x t1 t2 Q,
      eval s t1 Q1 ->
      (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (subst x v1 t2) Q) ->
      eval s (trm_let x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_if : forall s (b : Bool) t1 t2 Q,
      eval s (if b then t1 else t2) Q ->
      eval s (trm_if (val_bool b) t1 t2) Q
  | eval_unop : forall op s v1 P Q,
      evalunop op v1 P ->
      purepostin s P Q ->
      eval s (trm_app op v1) Q
  | eval_binop : forall op s (v1 v2 : val) P Q,
      evalbinop op v1 v2 P ->
      purepostin s P Q ->
      eval s (trm_app (trm_app op v1) v2) Q
  | eval_ref : forall s x t1 t2 (Q Q₁ : val → state → Prop),
    eval s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v1 s1, Q₁ v1 s1 → ∀ p ∉ s1,
     eval (s1.insert p v1) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s.erase p)) →
    eval s (trm_ref x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_get : forall s p Q,
      p ∈ s ->
      Q (read_state p s) s ->
      eval s (trm_app val_get (val_loc p)) Q
  | eval_set : forall s p v Q,
      v = trm_val v' ->
      p ∈ s ->
      Q val_unit (Finmap.insert p v' s) ->
      eval s (trm_app (trm_app val_set (val_loc p)) v) Q
  | eval_alloc_arg : forall s Q₁ Q,
    ¬ trm_is_val t1 →
    eval s t1 Q₁ →
    (∀ v' s', Q₁ v' s' → eval s' (trm_alloc x v' t2) Q) →
    eval s (trm_alloc x t1 t2) Q
  | eval_alloc : forall (sa : state) (n : ℤ) Q,
    n ≥ 0 →
    (∀ (p : loc) (sb : state),
      sb = conseq (make_list n.natAbs val_uninit) p →
      p ≠ null →
      Finmap.Disjoint sa sb →
      eval (sb ∪ sa) (subst x p t2) fun v s ↦ Q v (s \ sb)) →
    eval sa (trm_alloc x n t2) Q
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  | eval_for (n₁ n₂ : Int) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    eval s (if (n₁ < n₂) then
               (trm_seq (subst x n₁ t₁) (trm_for x (val_int (n₁ + 1)) n₂ t₁))
            else val_unit) Q ->
    eval s (trm_for x n₁ n₂ t₁) Q
  | eval_while (t₁ t₂ : trm) (Q : val -> state -> Prop) :
    eval s t₁ Q₁ ->
    (∀ s v, Q₁ v s -> eval s (trm_if v (trm_seq t₂ (trm_while t₁ t₂)) val_unit) Q) ->
    eval s (trm_while t₁ t₂) Q

def qwand {A} (Q1 Q2 : A → hProp) : hProp :=
  hforall (fun (x : A) => hwand (Q1 x) (Q2 x))

partial def xsimp_step_r (xsimp : XSimpR) : TacticM Unit := do
  trace[xsimp] "RHS step"
  trace[xsimp] "hrt: {xsimp.hrt}"
  match xsimp.hlw, xsimp.hlt, xsimp.hrt with
  | `(hempty), `(hempty), `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ $h $_) =>
     
    try
      trace[xsimp] "xsimp_r deals with: {h}"
      match h with
      | `(hempty) => {| apply xsimp_r_hempty |}
      | `(hpure $_) => {| apply xsimp_r_hpure |}
      | `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ $h1 $h2) =>
        {| erw [@hstar_assoc $h1 $h2];
           simpNums |} 
                       
          
        xsimp_step_r (<- XSimpRIni)
      | `(@HWand.hWand hProp hProp $_ $_ $h1 $_) =>
        match h1 with
        | `(hpure $_) => {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
        | _ => {| apply xsimp_r_hwand_same |}
      | `(htop) =>
        match xsimp.hrg with
        | `(hempty) =>
          {| apply xsimpl_r_hgc_or_htop |}
          repeat'' do
            xsimp_pick_same h xsimp.hla
            {| apply xsimp_lr_cancel_same |}
        | `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ htop hempty) => {| apply xsimpl_r_htop_drop |}
        | _ => throwError "xsimp_step_r: @ unreachable"
      | `(@hexists $_ fun ($x:ident : $_) => $_) => xsimp_r_hexists_apply_hints x
      | `(protect $_) => {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
      | `(hsingle $x $_) =>
        
        if x.isMVarStx then
          {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
        else
          xsimp_pick_same_pointer x xsimp.hla
          
          
          {| apply xsimpl_lr_cancel_same_hsingle <;>
             xsimp_hsingle_discharge |}
      | _ =>
        if h.isMVarStx then
          {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
        else
        xsimp_pick_same h xsimp.hla
        {| apply xsimp_lr_cancel_same |}
    catch ex =>
      trace[xsimp] ex.toMessageData
      {| apply xsimp_r_keep |}
  | _, _, _ => throwError "not implemented"

abbrev HintExtState := List Syntax

L in Archive.Hairer

class AddCommMonoidWRT (α : Type) (add' : semiOutParam $ α -> α -> α) extends AddCommMonoid α where
  addE : (· + ·) = add'

List.nil in Init.Prelude

local instance : HAdd ℕ ℤ val := ⟨fun x y => ((x : Int) + y)⟩

def formula_sound (t : trm) (F : formula) : Prop :=
  forall Q, F Q ==> wp t Q

Lean.Syntax in Init.Prelude

instance [PartialCommMonoidWRT val add valid] : AddCommMonoidWRT hProp hadd where
  addE := by admit /- proof elided -/

Coe in Init.Coe

def wp (t : trm) (Q : val → hProp) : hProp :=
  fun s ↦ eval s t Q

def hstar (H1 H2 : hProp) : hProp :=
  fun h => exists h1 h2,
    H1 h1 ∧ H2 h2 ∧ Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 ∧ h = h1 ∪ h2

propext in Init.Core

def harray (L : List val) (p : loc) : hProp :=
  hheader (L.length) p ∗ hseg L p 0

GetElem in Init.GetElem

@[app_unexpander hforall] def unexpandHForall : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) fun $x:ident => h∀ $xs:binderIdent*, $b) => `(h∀ $x:ident $xs:binderIdent*, $b)
  | `($(_) fun $x:ident => $b)                     => `(h∀ $x:ident, $b)
  | `($(_) fun ($x:ident : $t) => $b)              => `(h∀ ($x:ident : $t), $b)
  | t                                              => pure t

AList.insert in Mathlib.Data.List.AList

AList.lookup in Mathlib.Data.List.AList

def xcahngeCore (l : Expr) : MVarId -> MetaM (List MVarId) := fun goal => do
  let goal <-
    match_expr <- goal.getType with
    | himpl _ _ => pure goal
    | qimpl _ _ _ => pure (<- goal.intro1P).2
    | _ => throwError "Expected a heap entailment"
  xchangeApply l goal

Finmap in Mathlib.Data.Finmap

List.Perm in Init.Data.List.Basic

optParam in Init.Prelude

Lean.Meta.unhygienic in Batteries.Lean.Meta.Basic

t in Ssreflect.IntroPats

Int.toNat in Init.Data.Int.Basic

abbrev valid : val -> Prop := fun _ => False

@[app_unexpander trm_app] def unexpandApp : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander := fun x => do
  
  match x with
  | `($(_) [uop|$uop] [lang| $t]) => `([lang| $uop:uop$t])
  | `($(_) $app [lang| $t2]) =>
    
    match app with
    | `([bop| $bop].trm_app [lang| $t1]) => `([lang| $t1 $bop $t2])
    | `([lang| $t1]) => `([lang| $t1 $t2])
    | `(val_array_get) => return x
    | `(trm_app val_array_get [lang| $t1]) => `([lang| $t1[$t2] ])
    | `(val_array_set) => return x
    | `(trm_app val_array_set [lang| $_]) => return x
    | `(trm_app $app [lang| $t1]) =>
      match app with
      | `(trm_app val_array_set [lang| $t0]) => `([lang| $t0[$t1] := $t2])
      
      
      
      
      
      | _ => throw ( )
    | _ => throw ( )
  | `($(_) [bop| $bop] [lang| $t1]) => return x
  
  
  
  
  | _ => throw ( )

Lean.Elab.Tactic.TacticM in Lean.Elab.Tactic.Basic

@[app_unexpander trm_seq] def unexpandSeq : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) [lang| $t1] [lang| $t2]) => `([lang| $t1 ; $t2])
  | _ => throw ( )

@[app_unexpander val_int] def unexpandInt : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) $n:num) => `($n:num)
  | `($(_) $n:ident) => `($n:ident)
  | `($(_) $n:term) => `(lang|⟨$n:term⟩)
  | _ => throw ( )

Lean.bracketedExplicitBinders in Init.NotationExtra

def xsimp_flip_acc_lr (hla hra : Term) : TacticM Unit :=
  {| xsimp_flip_acc_l $hla ; xsimp_flip_acc_r $hra |}

Unit in Init.Prelude

def getTripleFun (g : Expr) : MetaM Name := do
  let_expr triple t _ _ := g | throwError "goal is not a triple"
  let_expr trm_app t _ := t | throwError "triple term is not an application"
  let .some n := (getNestedApp t).constName? | throwError "nested application is not a constant"
  return n

Lean.pp.all in Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator.Options

Lean.Meta.inferType in Lean.Meta.Basic

instance : Inhabited val where
  default := val.val_unit

Lean.Name.cmp in Lean.Data.Name

macro "h∀" xs:Lean.explicitBinders ", " b:term : term => Lean.expandExplicitBinders ``hforall xs b

Finmap.liftOn₂ in Mathlib.Data.Finmap

def delabAll :=
  (withOptions (fun _ => KVMap.empty.insert `pp.funBinderTypes true) $ PrettyPrinter.delab ·)

@[app_unexpander trm_val] def unexpandVal : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander := fun x =>
  match x with
  | `($(_) $x:ident) =>
    match x with
    | `(val_array_get) => `($x)
    | `(val_array_set) => `($x)
    | `(val_unit) => `([lang| ()])
    | `(val_array_make) => `([uop| mkarr])
    | _ => `([lang| $x:ident])
  | `($(_) $x) =>
    match x with
    | `($n:num) => `([lang| $n:num])
    | `($n:ident) => `([lang| $n:ident])
    | `(lang|⟨$n:term⟩) => `([lang| ⟨$n⟩])
    | `([lang| $_]) => return x
    | `([uop| $_]) => return x
    | `([bop| $_]) => return x
    | t => `([lang| ⟨$t⟩])
  | _ => throw ( )

@[simp]
def haddE : (· + ·) = (· ∗ ·) :=

List.ofFn in Init.Data.List.OfFn

def eval_like (t1 t2:trm) : Prop :=
  forall s Q, eval s t1 Q -> eval s t2 Q

def haffine (_ : hProp) :=
  True

instance : Coe Bool val where
  coe b := val.val_bool b

def val_array_get : val := [lang|
  fun p i =>
    let p1 := p ++ 1 in
    let q := p1 ++ i in
    !q ]

instOfNat in Init.Data.Int.Basic

@[default_instance]
instance : HStar hProp hProp hProp where
  hStar := hstar

elim in Ssreflect.Elim

srw in Ssreflect.Rewrite

@[app_unexpander trm_var] def unexpandVar : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) $x:str) =>
    let str := x.getString
    let name := Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkSimple str
    `([lang| $name:ident])
  | _ => throw ( )

def xsimp_pick (i : Nat) (last? : Bool) : TacticM Unit :=
   {| apply xsimp_pick_lemma
      · apply $(hstar_pick_lemma i last?) |}

def hstars_simp_post :=
  {| hsimp ; try apply himpl_refl |}

def xsimp_pick_applied (h hla : Term) : TacticM Unit := do
  let h <- Term.elabTerm h  none
  hstar_search hla fun i h' last? => do
    let h' <- Term.elabTerm h' none
    let numArgs + 1 := h'.getAppNumArgs' | throwError "not equal"
    let h' := h'.consumeMData.getAppPrefix numArgs
    let .true <-
      withAssignableSyntheticOpaque <| isDefEq h h' | throwError "not equal"
    xsimp_pick i last?

Lean.pp.universes in Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator.Options

def hProp.Disjoint (H₁ H₂ : hProp) :=
  forall h1 h2, H₁ h1 -> H₂ h2 -> h1.Disjoint h2

def test1 : Finmap (fun _ : ℕ ↦ ℕ) := Finmap.singleton 0 1

Set.InjOn in Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations

Lean.Elab.Tactic.getMainTarget in Lean.Elab.Tactic.Basic

def wpgen_fix (Fof : val → val → formula) : formula :=
  fun Q ↦ h∀ vf, ⌜forall vx Q', Fof vf vx Q' ==>
    wp (trm_app vf vx) Q'⌝ -∗ Q vf

def htop : hProp :=
  hexists (fun (H : hProp) => H)

Option.any in Init.Data.Option.Basic

shave in Ssreflect.Have

tryGoal in Ssreflect.Utils

def hgc := htop

def val_array_set : val := [lang|
  fun p i v =>
    let p1 := p ++ 1 in
    let q := p1 ++ i in
    q := v ]

def test2 : Finmap (fun _ : ℕ ↦ ℕ) := Finmap.singleton 1 2

Lean.explicitBinders in Init.NotationExtra

List in Init.Prelude

@[simp]
abbrev add : val -> val -> val
  | .val_bool i, .val_bool j => val.val_bool (i || j)
  | _, _ => val.val_unit

List.zip in Init.Data.List.Basic

def default_set : val := [lang|
  fun p i v =>
      let i := val_abs i in
      let L := val_array_length p in
      let b := i < L in
      if b then
        val_array_set p i v
      else
        () ]

abbrev default_get' := default_get (val_int 0)

macro "lang_def" n:ident ":=" l:lang : command => do
  `(def $n:ident : val := [lang| $l])

sapply in Ssreflect.ApplyIn

@[app_unexpander val_unit] def unexpandUnitL : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_)) => `([lang| ()])

def xchangeApply (l : Expr) : MVarId -> MetaM (List MVarId) := fun goal => do
  let g :: gs <- goal.applyConst `xchange_lemma | throwError "Expected a heap entailment"
  let gs' <- g.apply $ <- toHimp l
  return gs ++ gs'

def XSimpRIni : TacticM XSimpR := withMainContext do
  (<- getMainGoal).setTag `xsimp_goal
  let goal <- getGoalStxNN
  let `(XSimp $hl $hr) := goal | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  let `(@Prod.mk hProp $_ $hla $hlwt) := hl | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  let `(@Prod.mk hProp hProp $hlw $hlt) := hlwt | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  let `(@Prod.mk hProp $_ $hra $hrgt) := hr | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  let `(@Prod.mk hProp hProp $hrg $hrt) := hrgt | throwError "not a XSimp goal"
  return { hla := hla, hlw := hlw, hlt := hlt, hra := hra, hrg := hrg, hrt := hrt }

def null : loc := 0

Finmap.foldl in Mathlib.Data.Finmap

DecidableEq in Init.Prelude

@[app_unexpander trm_funs] def unexpandTFuns : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
  | `($(_) [ $xs:str,* ] [lang| $f]) =>
    let xs := xs.getElems.map (Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkSimple ·.getString)
    `([lang| fun $xs* => $f])
  | _ => throw ( )

Finset.Ico in Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs

def wpgen_seq (F1 F2 : formula) : formula :=
  fun Q ↦ F1 (fun _ ↦ F2 Q)

Option in Init.Prelude

def harray_int (L : List Int) : loc → hProp :=
  harray (L.map val_int)

def hrange (L : List val) (p : loc) : hProp :=
  match L with
  | []      => emp
  | x :: L' => (p ~~> x) ∗ (hrange L' (p + 1))

def hstars_simp_step : TacticM Unit := withMainContext do
  let goal <- getGoalStxNN
  match goal with
    | `(himpl $Hl $Hr) =>
        match Hr with
          | `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ $_ $hs) =>
              match hs with
              | `(@HStar.hStar hProp hProp $_ $_ $H $_) =>
                    try
                      xsimp_pick_same H Hl hstars_simp_pick ;
                      {| apply hstars_simp_cancel_lemma |}
                    catch ex =>
                      let s <- ex.toMessageData.toString
                      if s == "not equal" then
                        {| apply hstars_simp_keep_lemma |}
                      else
                        throw ex
              | _ => throwError "cannot simplify"
          | _ => throwError "cannot simplify"
    | _ => throwError "cannot simplify"

scase! in Ssreflect.Elim

def val_funs (xs:List var) (t:trm) : val :=
  match xs with
  | [] => panic! "function with zero argumets!"
  | x1::xs' => val_fun x1 (trm_funs xs' t)

@[default_instance]
instance : HWand hProp hProp hProp where
  hWand := hwand

def val.is_loc : val -> Prop
  | val_loc _ => True
  | _ => False

local instance : HAdd ℤ ℤ val := ⟨fun x y => val.val_int (x + y)⟩

ident in Ssreflect.IntroPats

partial def getList! (xs : Syntax) : (List Syntax) :=
  match xs with
  | `(List.nil) => []
  | `(List.cons $x $xs) => x::getList! xs
  | _ => panic! "getList!: {xs} is not a list"

List.keys in Mathlib.Data.List.Sigma
</all_available_defs>

<all_available_lemmas>
lemma himpl_trans H2 H1 H3 :
  (H1 ==> H2) → (H2 ==> H3) → (H1 ==> H3)

lemma himpl_trans_r H2 H1 H3:
  H2 ==> H3 → H1 ==> H2 → H1 ==> H3

lemma himpl_antisym H1 H2:
  (H1 ==> H2) → (H2 ==> H1) → (H1 = H2)

lemma hprop_op_comm (op : hProp → hProp → hProp) :
  (forall H1 H2, op H1 H2 ==> op H2 H1) →
  (forall H1 H2, op H1 H2 = op H2 H1)

lemma hempty_inv h :
  emp h → h = ∅

lemma hstar_inv (H1 H2 : hProp) h:
  (H1 ∗ H2) h →
  exists h1 h2, H1 h1 ∧ H2 h2 ∧ Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 ∧ h = h1 ∪ h2

lemma hstar_comm H1 H2 :
  H1 ∗ H2 = H2 ∗ H1

lemma hstar_assoc H1 H2 H3 :
  (H1 ∗ H2) ∗ H3 = H1 ∗ (H2 ∗ H3)

lemma hstar_hempty_l H :
  emp ∗ H = H

lemma hstar_hempty_r H :
  H ∗ emp = H

lemma hstar_hexists A (J : A → hProp) H :
  (hexists J) ∗ H = hexists (fun x => (J x) ∗ H)

lemma hstar_hforall A (J : A → hProp) H :
  (hforall J) ∗ H ==> hforall (J ∗ H)

lemma himpl_frame_r H1 H2 H2' :
  H2 ==> H2' →
  (H1 ∗ H2) ==> (H1 ∗ H2')

lemma himpl_hstar_trans_l H1 H2 H3 H4 :
  H1 ==> H2 →
  H2 ∗ H3 ==> H4 →
  H1 ∗ H3 ==> H4

lemma hstar_hpure_l P H h :
  (⌜P⌝ ∗ H) h = (P ∧ H h)

lemma himpl_hempty_hpure P :
  P → emp ==> ⌜P⌝

lemma himpl_hstar_hpure_l P H H' :
  (P → H ==> H') →
  (⌜P⌝ ∗ H) ==> H'

lemma himpl_hexists_l A H (J : A → hProp) :
  (forall x, J x ==> H) → (hexists J) ==> H

lemma himpl_hexists_r A (x : A) H (J : A → hProp) :
  (H ==> J x) →
  H ==> (hexists J)

lemma himpl_hforall_r A (J : A → hProp) H :
  (forall x, H ==> J x) →
  H ==> (hforall J)

lemma himpl_hforall_l A (x : A) (J : A → hProp) H :
  (J x ==> H) →
  (hforall J) ==> H

lemma hwandE :
  H1 -∗ H2 = hexists (fun H0 => H0 ∗ hpure ((H1 ∗ H0) ==> H2))

lemma hwand_equiv H0 H1 H2 :
  (H0 ==> H1 -∗ H2) ↔ (H1 ∗ H0 ==> H2)

lemma himpl_hwand_r_inv H1 H2 H3 :
  H1 ==> (H2 -∗ H3) →
  H2 ∗ H1 ==> H3

lemma hwand_cancel H1 H2 :
  H1 ∗ (H1 -∗ H2) ==> H2

lemma qwandE α (Q1 Q2 : α → hProp) :
  Q1 -∗ Q2 = hforall (fun x => (Q1 x) -∗ (Q2 x))

lemma qstarE α (Q1 : α → hProp)  (H : hProp):
  Q1 ∗ H = fun x => Q1 x ∗ H

lemma qwand_equiv H A (Q1 Q2 : A → hProp) :
  H ==> (Q1 -∗ Q2) ↔ (Q1 ∗ H) ===> Q2

lemma qwand_cancel A (Q1 Q2 : A → hProp) :
  Q1 ∗ (Q1 -∗ Q2) ===> Q2

lemma eval_conseq s t Q1 Q2 :
  eval s t Q1 →
  Q1 ===> Q2 →
  eval s t Q2

lemma eval_frame (h1 h2 : state) t (Q : val -> hProp) :
  eval h1 t (ofhProp Q) →
  Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 →
  eval (h1 ∪ h2) t (Q ∗ (tohProp (fun h ↦ h = h2)))

lemma nth_middle (A : Type) (IA : Inhabited A) (n : Nat)
  (l1 l2 : List A) (x : A) :
  n = l1.length → (l1 ++ x :: l2)[n]! = x

lemma AList.erase_noop {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (l : AList β) :
    a ∉ l → (AList.erase a l).entries.Perm l.entries

lemma isubst_perm {al al'} t (hp : al.entries.Perm al'.entries) :
  isubst al t = isubst al' t

theorem Perm.kmerge {l₁ l₂ l₃ l₄ : List (Sigma (fun _ : loc => val))} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) /- nd₁ is necessary -/ (nd₃ : l₃.NodupKeys)
    (p₁₂ : l₁.Perm l₂) (p₃₄ : l₃.Perm l₄) : (kmerge l₁ l₃).Perm $ kmerge l₂ l₄

lemma hpure_intro_hempty P h :
  emp h → P → ⌜P⌝ h

lemma hind_any h : ⊤⊤ h

@[simp]
lemma AList.merge_empty_r (h : AList (fun _ : loc => val)) : AList.merge h ∅ = h

lemma sP_strongest :
  eval h t Q -> sP h t ===> Q

@[simp]
lemma labSet_mem :
  x ∈ ⟪l, s⟫ ↔ x.lab = l ∧ x.val ∈ s

lemma val_loc_congr :
  n1 = n2 →
  val.val_loc n1 = val.val_loc n2

lemma hstar_pick_last_8 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 = h8 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7

lemma triple_subr r1 r2 :
  triple (trm_app val_sub (val_real r1) (val_real r2))
    emp
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = val_real (r1 - r2)⌝)

lemma himpl_lr_htop :
  XSimp (emp, emp, emp) (emp, Hrg, emp) ->
  XSimp (Hla, emp, emp) (emp, (⊤ ∗ Hrg), emp)

lemma triple_if (b : Bool) t1 t2 H Q :
  triple (if b then t1 else t2) H Q →
  triple (trm_if b t1 t2) H Q

lemma hstar_flip_0 :
  emp = emp

lemma hstar_hgc_hgc : /GC ∗ /GC = /GC

lemma wp_app_fun x v1 v2 t1 Q :
  v1 = val_fun x t1 →
  wp (subst x v2 t1) Q ==> wp (trm_app v1 v2) Q

lemma haffine_hexists A (J : A → hProp) :
  (forall x, haffine (J x)) →
  haffine (hexists J)

lemma triple_array_length_hheader (n : Int) (p : loc) :
  triple (trm_app val_array_length p)
    (hheader n p)
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = n⌝ ∗ hheader n p)

@[simp]
lemma labSet_diff (l : ℕ) (s s' : Set α) :
   ⟪l, s⟫ \ ⟪l, s'⟫ = ⟪l, s \ s'⟫

lemma qimpl_refl (Q : α -> hProp) : Q ===> Q

lemma hpure_inv_hempty P h :
  ⌜P⌝ h →
  P ∧ emp h

lemma kmerge_comm_perm (l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma (fun _ : loc => val))) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys) :
  (kmerge l₁ l₂).Perm $ (kmerge l₂ l₁)

lemma wp_let x t1 t2 Q :
  wp t1 (fun v ↦ wp (subst x v t2) Q) ==> wp (trm_let x t1 t2) Q

lemma union_same_keys (h₁ h₂ h₃ : state) :
  h₁.Disjoint h₃ → h₂.Disjoint h₃ →
  (h₁ ∪ h₃).keys = (h₂ ∪ h₃).keys →
  h₁.keys = h₂.keys

lemma intersect_disjoint_cancel (s₁ s₂ s₃ : state) :
  s₁.Disjoint s₃ →
  (s₁ ∪ intersect s₂ s₃) \ s₃ = s₁

lemma wpgen_fail_sound t :
  formula_sound t wpgen_fail

lemma xsimpl_lr_cancel_htop :
  XSimp (Hla, Hlw, Hlt) (Hra, (⊤ ∗ Hrg), Hrt) ->
  XSimp ((H ∗ Hla), Hlw, Hlt) (Hra, (⊤ ∗ Hrg), Hrt)

@[simp]
lemma disjoint_add_eq (h₁ h₂ h₃ : heap) :
  (h₁ +ʰ h₂).Disjoint h₃ = (h₁.Disjoint h₃ ∧ h₂.Disjoint h₃)

lemma triple_array_set_hseg L (p : loc) (i j : Int) (v : val) :
  0 <= i - j ∧ i - j < L.length →
  triple (trm_app val_array_set p i v)
    (hseg L p j)
    (fun _ ↦ hseg (L.set (Int.natAbs (i - j)) v) p j)

lemma xfun_spec_lemma (S:val->Prop) H Q Fof :
  (forall (vf : val),
    (forall (vx : val) H' Q', (H' ==> Fof vx Q') → triple (trm_app vf vx) H' Q') →
    S vf) →
  (forall vf, S vf -> (H ==> Q vf)) →
  H ==> wpgen_fun Fof Q

lemma Heap.add_assoc (h₁ h₂ h₃ : heap) : (h₁ +ʰ h₂) +ʰ h₃ = h₁ +ʰ h₂ +ʰ h₃

lemma triple_alloc_arg :
  ¬trm_is_val t1 →
  triple t1 H Q1 →
  (∀ v, triple (trm_alloc x (trm_val v) t2) (Q1 v) Q ) →
  triple (trm_alloc x t1 t2) H Q

lemma evalExact_post :
  eval s t Q → evalExact s t Q' → Q' ===> Q

lemma add_Int.natAbs i j :
  0 <= i - j → j + Int.natAbs (i - j) = i

lemma wp_ref x v t Q :
  (h∀ p, (p ~~> v) -∗ wp (subst x p t) (Q ∗ ∃ʰ v', (p ~~> v'))) ==>
  wp (trm_ref x v t) Q

lemma finite_state' n (s : state) :
  ∃ p, p ≠ null ∧
    Finmap.Disjoint s (conseq (make_list n val_uninit) p)

lemma AList_erase_entries (l : @AList loc (fun _ ↦ val)) :
  (l.erase p).entries = (l.entries).kerase p

lemma xsimp_l_hpure :
  (p -> XSimp (hla, hlw, hlt) hr) ->
  XSimp (hla, hlw, ⌜p⌝ ∗ hlt) hr

@[trans]
lemma eval_like_trans {t1 t2 t3 : trm} : eval_like t1 t2 → eval_like t2 t3 → eval_like t1 t3

lemma sP'_strongest :
  eval h t Q → sP' h t ===> Q

lemma triple_seq t1 t2 H Q H1 :
  triple t1 H (fun _ ↦ H1) →
  triple t2 H1 Q →
  triple (trm_seq t1 t2) H Q

lemma triple_app_fix v1 v2 f x t1 H Q :
  v1 = val_fix f x t1 →
  triple (subst x v2 (subst f v1 t1)) H Q →
  triple (trm_app v1 v2) H Q

lemma haffine_hempty : haffine emp

lemma hseg_start_eq L p j1 j2 :
  j1 = j2 →
  hseg L p j1 ==> hseg L p j2

lemma wp_seq t1 t2 Q :
  wp t1 (fun _ ↦ wp t2 Q) ==> wp (trm_seq t1 t2) Q

lemma natabs_nonneg (p : Nat) (n : Int) :
  n ≥ 0 → (p + n).natAbs = p + n.natAbs

lemma steps_trans s1 s2 s3 t1 t2 t3 :
  steps s1 t1 s2 t2 →
  steps s2 t2 s3 t3 →
  steps s1 t1 s3 t3

lemma harray_eq p L :
  harray L p = ∃ʰ n, ⌜n = L.length⌝ ∗ hheader n p ∗ hseg L p 0

lemma set_nth_same (A : Type) (IA : Inhabited A) (n : Nat) (l : List A) :
  n < l.length → l.set n l[n]! = l

lemma hstar_pick_last_4 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 = h4 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3

lemma xfor_inv_lemma (I : Int -> hProp) (a b : Int)
  (F : val -> formula)
  (Q : val -> hProp) :
  structural_pred F ->
  a <= b ->
    (∃ H',
      H ==> I a ∗ H' ∧
      (∀ i, a <= i ∧ i < b -> I i ==> F i fun _ => I (i + 1)) ∧
      (fun _ => I b ∗ H') ===> Q) ->
    H ==> wpgen_for a b F Q

lemma insert_mem_keys (s : state) :
  p ∈ s →
  (s.insert p v).keys = s.keys

lemma triple_mul n1 n2 :
  triple (trm_app val_mul (val_int n1) (val_int n2))
    emp
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = val_int (n1 * n2)⌝)

lemma validInter_empty_r (h : heap) : h ⊥ʰ ∅

lemma xwhile_inv_basic_lemmaQ (I : Bool -> α -> hProp) R:
  WellFounded R ->
  (H ==> H' ∗ ∃ʰ b a, I b a) ->
  (∀ b X, I b X ==> wp F1 (fun bv => I b X ∗ ⌜bv = b⌝)) ->
  (∀ X, I true X ==> wp F2 (fun _ => ∃ʰ b X', ⌜R X' X⌝ ∗ I b X')) ->
  ((fun _ => H' ∗ ∃ʰ a, I false a) ===> Q) ->
  H ==> wp (trm_while F1 F2) Q

lemma hstar_pick_last_5 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 = h5 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4

lemma triple_alloc (n : Int) :
  n ≥ 0 →
  (∀ (p : loc), triple (subst x p t)
    (H ∗ ⌜p ≠ null⌝ ∗ hrange (make_list n.natAbs val_uninit) p)
    (Q ∗ ⌜p ≠ null⌝  ∗ ∃ʰ L, ⌜L.length = n⌝ ∗ hrange L p) ) →
  triple (trm_alloc x n t) H Q

lemma hsingle_intro p v :
  (p ~~> v) (Finmap.singleton p v)

lemma hstars_simp_cancel_lemma :
  H1 ==> Ha ∗ Ht →
  H ∗ H1 ==> Ha ∗ H ∗ Ht

lemma val_int_congr :
  n1 = n2 →
  val.val_int n1 = val.val_int n2

lemma hstar_flip_10 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 ∗ h9 ∗ h10 ∗ emp =
  h10 ∗ h9 ∗ h8 ∗ h7 ∗ h6 ∗ h5 ∗ h4 ∗ h3 ∗ h2 ∗ h1 ∗ emp

lemma getElem!_nil_intval (n : Int) :
  ([] : List val)[n]! = default

lemma triple_hwand_hpure_l t (P : Prop) H Q :
  P →
  triple t H Q →
  triple t (⌜P⌝ -∗ H) Q

@[simp]
theorem mem_diff_iff (h₁ h₂ : state) :
  p ∈ h₁ \ h₂ ↔ p ∈ h₁ ∧ p ∉ h₂

lemma kmerge_dlookup (l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma (fun _ : loc => val))) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
    (a : loc) : (kmerge l₁ l₂).dlookup a = Option.merge (· + ·) (l₁.dlookup a) (l₂.dlookup a)

lemma state_eq_not_mem (p : loc) (h1 h2 : state) :
  h1 = h2 →
  p ∉ h1 →
  p ∉ h2

lemma triple_array_get_hseg L (p : loc) (i j : Int) (_ : 0 <= i - j ∧ i - j < L.length) :
  triple [lang| val_array_get p i]
    (hseg L p j)
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = L[(i - j).natAbs]!⌝ ∗ hseg L p j)

lemma eval_like_trm_apps_funs (heqv0 : v0 = trm_funs xs t1) :
  eval_like (isubst (xs.mkAlist vs) t1) (trm_apps (val_funs xs t1) ts)

lemma insert_frame :
  s.Disjoint h2 →
  p ∈ s →
  fun v'' s' ↦ v'' = val_unit ∧ s' = Finmap.insert p v' (s ∪ h2) =
  (qstar (fun v'' s' ↦ v'' = val_unit ∧ s' = Finmap.insert p v' s) (tohProp fun h ↦ h = h2))

@[heapSimp]
lemma foo'' : (@OfNat.ofNat val n _) = val.val_int (n : ℤ)

lemma triple_neq v1 v2 :
  triple (trm_app val_neq (trm_val v1) (trm_val v2))
    emp
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = is_true (v1 ≠ v2)⌝)

lemma xsimp_flip_acc_r_lemma :
  hra = hra' →
  XSimp (hla, emp, emp) (hra', hrg, emp) →
  XSimp (hla, emp, emp) (hra, hrg, emp)

lemma hadd_single_gen (v v' : val) [PartialCommMonoid val] :
  PartialCommMonoid.valid v ->
  PartialCommMonoid.valid v' ->
  (p ~~> v) + (p ~~> v') = p ~~> (v + v')

lemma xsimp_lr_cancel_same :
  XSimp (hla, hlw, hlt) (hra, hrg, hrt) ->
  XSimp (h ∗ hla, hlw, hlt) (hra, hrg, h ∗ hrt)

lemma union_monotone_r (s₃ s₁ s₂ : state) :
  s₁ = s₂ →
  s₁ ∪ s₃ = s₂ ∪ s₃

lemma hrange_eq_conseq (L : List val) (n : ℤ) (p : loc) (s : state) :
  L.length = n →
  hrange L p s →
  s.keys = (conseq (make_list n.natAbs val_uninit) p).keys

lemma xwp_lemma_funs (xs : List _) (vs : List val) :
  t = trm_apps v0 ts ->
  v0 = val_funs xs t1 ->
  trms_to_vals ts = vs ->
  var_funs xs vs.length ->
  H ==> wpgen (isubst (xs.mkAlist vs) t1) Q ->
  triple t H Q

lemma val_funs_snoc (xs : List var) (x : var) (h : xs ≠ []) (t : trm) :
  val_funs (xs ++ [x]) t = val_funs xs (trm_fun x t)

lemma wp_val v Q :
  Q v ==> wp (trm_val v) Q

lemma triple_let x t1 t2 Q1 H Q :
  triple t1 H Q1 →
  (forall v1, triple (subst x v1 t2) (Q1 v1) Q) →
  triple (trm_let x t1 t2) H Q

@[simp]
lemma kmerge_empty_r (l : List (Sigma (fun _ : loc => val))) : kmerge l [] = l

@[simp]
lemma star_post_empty (Q : α -> hProp) :
  Q ∗ emp = Q

lemma lookup_intersect (s₁ s₂ : state) :
  p ∈ s₁ ∧ p ∈ s₂ →
  (intersect s₁ s₂).lookup p = s₁.lookup p

lemma mkstruct_monotone F1 F2 Q :
  (forall Q, F1 Q ==> F2 Q) →
  mkstruct F1 Q ==> mkstruct F2 Q

lemma non_mem_diff_helper1 (h₁ : state) (l : @AList loc fun _ ↦ val) :
  a ∉ l →
  p ∈ List.foldl (fun d s ↦ Finmap.erase s.fst d) (Finmap.erase a h₁) l.entries →
  p ≠ a

lemma set_out_of_bounds (L : List val) i v :
  i < 0 ∨ i ≥ L.length →
  L.set i v = L

lemma hstar_pick_7 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h = h7 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h

lemma xsimp_l_cancel_hwand_hstar :
  XSimp (Hla, Hlw, (H2 -∗ H3) ∗ Hlt) HR →
  XSimp ((H1 ∗ Hla), (((H1 ∗ H2) -∗ H3) ∗ Hlw), Hlt) HR

lemma triple_mod n1 n2 :
  n2 ≠ 0 →
  triple (trm_app val_mod (val_int n1) (val_int n2))
    emp
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = val_int (n1 % n2)⌝)

lemma evalExact_frame_val (v : val) (s h2 : state) :
  s.Disjoint h2 →
  evalExact (s ∪ h2) t (fun v' s' ↦ v' = v ∧ s' = s ∪ h2) →
  evalExact (s ∪ h2) t
    (qstar (fun v' s' ↦ v' = v ∧ s' = s) (tohProp (fun h ↦ h = h2)))

lemma validInter_hop_distr_l (h₁ h₂ h₃ : heap) :
  (h₁ +ʰ h₂) ⊥ʰ h₃ -> (h₁ ⊥ʰ h₃ ∧ h₂ ⊥ʰ h₃)

lemma haffine_hpure P :
  haffine ⌜P⌝

lemma qimpl_wp_of_triple t F :
  (forall Q, triple t (F Q) Q) →
  F ===> wp t

lemma insert_neq_of_non_mem (h : state) :
  x ∉ h →
  x ≠ p →
  x ∉ h.insert p v

@[simp]
lemma Heap.add_single (v v' : val) [PartialCommMonoid val] :
  (Finmap.singleton p v) +ʰ (Finmap.singleton p v') = (Finmap.singleton p (v + v'))

lemma himpl_lr_qwand_unify (Q : α -> hProp):
  XSimp (Hla, emp, emp) ((Q -∗ (Q ∗ Hla)) ∗ emp, emp, emp)

lemma sum_Ico_succlr {_ : AddCommMonoid M} (f : Int -> M) (i j : Int) :
  ∑ i in ⟦i, j⟧, f (i+1) = ∑ i in ⟦i+1, j+1⟧, f i

lemma hcell_nonneg v p i :
  hcell v p i ==> hcell v p i ∗ ⌜i >= 0⌝

lemma remove_not_in_r (h1 h2 : state) (p : loc) :
  p ∉ h2 →
  (h1 ∪ h2).erase p = h1.erase p ∪ h2

lemma triple_ptr_add_nat p (f : ℕ) :
  triple (trm_app val_ptr_add (val_loc p) (val_int (Int.ofNat f)))
    emp
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = val_loc (p + f)⌝)

lemma xsimpl_r_hgc_or_htop :
  XSimp HL (Hra, (H ∗ Hrg), Hrt) ->
  XSimp HL (Hra, Hrg, (H ∗ Hrt))

lemma hstars_simp_start_lemma :
  H1 ∗ emp ==> emp ∗ H2 ∗ emp →
  H1 ==> H2

lemma hstar_pick_last_10 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 ∗ h9 ∗ h10 = h10 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 ∗ h9

lemma haffine_hstar H1 H2 :
  haffine H1 → haffine H2 → haffine (H1 ∗ H2)

lemma htop_eq :
  ⊤ = ∃ʰ H, H

lemma remove_not_in_l (h1 h2 : state) (p : loc) :
  p ∉ h1 →
  (h1 ∪ h2).erase p = h1 ∪ h2.erase p

lemma himpl_hempty_hwand_same H :
  emp ==> (H -∗ H)

lemma xpull_protect (h : H1 ==> protect H2) : H1 ==> H2

lemma wp_structural : structural (wp t)

lemma disjoint_single_same_inv {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v}
  (p : α) (v1 v2 : β p) :
  Finmap.Disjoint (Finmap.singleton p v1) (Finmap.singleton p v2) →
  False

lemma harray_focus_read i L p :
  0 <= i ∧ i < L.length →
  harray L p ==>
  hcell L[Int.natAbs i]! p i ∗ (hcell L[Int.natAbs i]! p i -∗ harray L p)

lemma isubst_empty t : isubst ∅ t = t

lemma diff_disjoint (h₁ h₂ : state) :
  h₂.Disjoint (h₁ \ h₂)

lemma hstar_pick_9 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 ∗ h9 ∗ h = h9 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h6 ∗ h7 ∗ h8 ∗ h

lemma mem_diff_helper (h₁ : state) (l : @AList loc fun _ ↦ val) :
  a ∉ l →
  (p ∈ List.foldl (fun d s ↦ Finmap.erase s.fst d) h₁ l.entries → p ∈ h₁) →
  p ∈ List.foldl (fun d s ↦ Finmap.erase s.fst d) (Finmap.erase a h₁) l.entries →
  p ∈ h₁

lemma triple_set w p (v : val) :
  triple (trm_app val_set (val_loc p) v)
    (p ~~> w)
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = val_unit⌝ ∗ (p ~~> v))

lemma xwhile_inv_measure_lemma_up (Xtop : Int) (I : Bool -> Int -> hProp) :
  (H ==> H' ∗ ∃ʰ b a, I b a) ->
  (∀ b X, I b X ==> wp F1 (fun bv => I b X ∗ ⌜bv = b⌝)) ->
  (∀ X, I true X ==> wp F2 (fun _ => ∃ʰ b X', ⌜X < X' ∧ X' <= Xtop⌝ ∗ I b X')) ->
  ((fun _ => H' ∗ ∃ʰ a, I false a) ===> Q) ->
  H ==> wp (trm_while F1 F2) Q

lemma xsimp_r_keep :
  XSimp hl (h ∗ hra, hrg, hrt) ->
  XSimp hl (hra, hrg, h ∗ hrt)

lemma eval_divr s r1 r2 Q :
  r2 ≠ 0 ->
  Q (val_real (r1 / r2)) s ->
  eval s (trm_app (trm_app val_div (val_real r1)) (val_real r2)) Q

lemma triple_hforall t A (x : A) (J : A → hProp) Q:
  triple t (J x) Q →
  triple t (hforall J) Q

lemma disjoint_single (h : state) :
  p ∉ h →
  h.Disjoint (Finmap.singleton p v)

lemma triple_array_get L (p : loc) (i : Int) : --(v : 0 <= i ∧ i < L.length) :
   0 <= i ∧ i < L.length →
   triple (trm_app val_array_get p i)
    (harray L p)
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = L[i.natAbs]!⌝ ∗ harray L p)

lemma update_app_r {A : Type} (l1 l2 : List A) n v :
  n ≥ l1.length →
  (l1 ++ l2).set n v = l1 ++ l2.set (n - l1.length) v

lemma hpure_intro P :
  P → ⌜P⌝  ∅

lemma hwand_hpure_l P H :
  P → (⌜P⌝ -∗ H) = H

lemma eval_app_arg1' s1 t1 t2 Q1 Q :
  eval s1 t1 Q1 ->
  (forall v1 s2, Q1 v1 s2 -> eval s2 (trm_app v1 t2) Q) ->
  eval s1 (trm_app t1 t2) Q

lemma himpl_lr_refl :
  XSimp (hla, emp, emp) (hla, emp, emp)

lemma hstar_comm_assoc (H1 H2 H3 : hProp) :
  H1 ∗ H2 ∗ H3 = H2 ∗ H1 ∗ H3

lemma hstar_intro (H1 H2 : hProp) h1 h2 :
  H1 h1 →
  H2 h2 →
  Finmap.Disjoint h1 h2 →
  (H1 ∗ H2) (h1 ∪ h2)

@[simp]
lemma Heap.add_lookup (h₁ h₂ : heap) (l : loc) :
  (h₁ +ʰ h₂).lookup l = Option.merge (·+·) (h₁.lookup l) (h₂.lookup l)

lemma wp_ramified_trans t H Q1 Q2 :
  H ==> (wp t Q1) ∗ (Q1 -∗ Q2) →
  H ==> (wp t Q2)

lemma hstar_pick_5 :
  h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h5 ∗ h = h5 ∗ h1 ∗ h2 ∗ h3 ∗ h4 ∗ h

lemma hadd_single (v v' : ℝ) :
  (p ~~> val.val_real v) + (p ~~> val.val_real v') = p ~~> val.val_real (v + v')

lemma xwhile_inv_basic_lemma (I : Bool -> α -> hProp) R
  -- (F1 F2 : formula)
  :
  WellFounded R ->
  -- structural F1 ->
  -- structural F2 ->
  (H ==> H' ∗ ∃ʰ b a, I b a) ->
  (∀ b X, I b X ==> wp F1 (fun bv => I b X ∗ ⌜bv = b⌝)) ->
  (∀ X, I true X ==> wp F2 (fun _ => ∃ʰ b X', ⌜R X' X⌝ ∗ I b X')) ->
  H ==> wp (trm_while F1 F2) (fun _ => H' ∗ ∃ʰ a, I false a)

lemma xsimp_l_acc_wand :
  XSimp (hla, h ∗ hlw, hlt) hr ->
  XSimp (hla, hlw, h ∗ hlt) hr

lemma wpgen_sound t :
  formula_sound t (wpgen t)

lemma wp_if_case (b : Bool) t1 t2 Q :
  (if b then wp t1 Q else wp t2 Q) ==> wp (trm_if b t1 t2) Q

lemma hpure_inv P h :
  ⌜P⌝ h →
  P ∧ h = ∅

lemma hforall_intro A (J : A → hProp) h :
  (forall x, J x h) → (hforall J) h

lemma xsimpl_lr_qwand α (Q1 Q2 : α -> hProp) :
  (forall x, XSimp (emp, emp, (Q1 x ∗ Hla)) (emp, emp, (Q2 x ∗ emp))) ->
  XSimp (Hla, emp, emp) (((Q1 -∗ Q2) ∗ emp), emp, emp)

lemma evalExact_frame_set :
  s.Disjoint h2 →
  p ∈ s →
  evalExact (s ∪ h2) t
    (fun v'' s' ↦ v'' = val_unit ∧ s' = Finmap.insert p v' (s ∪ h2)) →
  evalExact (s ∪ h2) t
    (qstar (fun v'' s' ↦ v'' = val_unit ∧ s' = Finmap.insert p v' s) (tohProp fun h ↦ h = h2))

lemma xsimp_l_hwand_reorder :
  h1 = h1' ->
  XSimp (hla, ((h1' -∗ h2) ∗ hlw), hlt) hr ->
  XSimp (hla, (h1 -∗ h2) ∗ hlw, hlt) hr

lemma triple_ler r1 r2 :
  triple (trm_app val_le (val_real r1) (val_real r2))
    emp
    (fun r ↦ ⌜r = val_bool (r1 <= r2)⌝)

@[simp]
lemma Heap.add_empty_l (h : heap) : ∅ +ʰ h = h

lemma insert_same (h1 h2 : state) :
  p ∉ h1 → p ∉ h2 →
  (h1.insert p v).keys = (h2.insert p v').keys →
  h1.keys = h2.keys

lemma eval_like_trm_app_left t1 t1' t2 (hsat : ∃ s Q, eval s t1 Q) : eval_like t1 t1' → eval_like (trm_app t1 t2) (trm_app t1' t2)

lemma eval_like_trm_apps_funs_pre (heqv0 : v0 = trm_funs xs t1) :
  eval_like t (trm_apps (val_funs xs t1) ts) ∧  -- NOTE: this part do not require `xs.Nodup`, but anyway
  eval_like (isubst (xs.mkAlist vs) t1) t

lemma Int.Ico_insert_succ_left (h : i < j) : insert i ⟦i+1, j⟧ = ⟦i, j⟧

lemma hstar_pick_last_2 :
  h1 ∗ h2 = h2 ∗ h1

lemma Heap.add_comm (h₁ h₂ : heap) : h₁ +ʰ h₂ = h₂ +ʰ h₁
</all_available_lemmas>

<local_ctx>
import Lean

import Mathlib.Data.Finmap

import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes

import SPLean.Common.State

import SPLean.Common.Util

import SPLean.Theories.HProp

import SPLean.Theories.XSimp

import SPLean.Theories.XChange

import SPLean.Theories.SepLog

import SPLean.Theories.WPUtil

open trm val prim

namespace Theories

def wp (t : trm) (Q : val → hProp) : hProp :=
  fun s ↦ eval s t Q

section tactics

open Lean Elab Tactic

section xapp

end xapp

end tactics

open AList

section funs_fixs_eval_like

variable (xs : List var) (vs : List val) (t : trm) (v0 : trm)
  (heqt : t = trm_apps v0 ts)
  (hconv : trms_to_vals ts = vs)
  (hform : var_funs xs vs.length)   -- NOTE: can be relaxed to `vs.length ≤ xs.length`

variable (f : var) (hf : f ∉ xs)

end funs_fixs_eval_like

end Theories

open Theories

open Lean.Elab.Tactic in
</local_ctx>

<target_theorem>
lemma xfor_lemma (z n : ℤ) (x : var) (I : ℤ -> hProp) :
  z <= n ->
  (H ==> H' ∗ I z) ->
  (∀ i, z <= i -> i < n -> I i ==> wp (subst x i F1) (fun _ => I (i + 1))) ->
  ((fun _ => I n ∗ H') ===> Q) ->
  H ==> wp (trm_for x z n F1) Q :=
</target_theorem>

